It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
I would agree with you if Israel had boarded the ships in Israel waters. They did not. That's why I disagree.
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
actually , events of 1982 demonstrate that NATO is not compelled to be " forced into war "
Originally posted by ken10
Wouldn't a precedent for this be the "Lusitania" incident, Which must have been declared an act of war, which brought the US into WW1 ?
Originally posted by harryhaller
This is a minefield. NATO obligations have always been taking seriously, in fact it's NATO that averted the USSR from doing anything rash. Isreal is HARDLY as influential or powerful as the USSR ever was.
The Irish Government has asked Israel to ensure that the Irish-flagged ship ‘complete its journey unimpeded and discharge its humanitarian cargo in Gaza’. The Irish prime minister, Brian Cowen, has warned Israel that it will face
‘the most serious consequences’
in the event that any harm comes to Irish citizens on board the humanitarian relief vessel.
[]
the Rachel Corrie should reach the Gaza Exclusion Zone some time between Friday night (4th June) and Saturday morning (5th June).
Originally posted by harryhaller
reply to post by intrepid
Fast becoming a choice between Israel and everyone else. And from what we're seeing, it's going to be Israel.
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by paraphi
is gaza in europe ? by any stretch of the imagination ???????