It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Israeli Navy: Next time we will use more force

page: 3
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in


posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 03:36 PM

Originally posted by CanadianDream420
Does it matter? Not to be rude..

I realize KILLING someone is a total atrocity, but the IDF members weapons were taken and they were being tackled and beaten. Killing 16 people is uncalled for, I agree, though.. there must be have been an alternative.

of course it matters, everyone has their reasons for supporting a group,
i hate anyone thats religous and i dont hide the fact that i am against Israel and its acts against its neigbours,

so you must have a reason to support these acts.

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 03:39 PM
reply to post by CanadianDream420

The blockade is ilegal and Gazza is not iserail and an attack in international waters is an act of war regardless of what the UN says because zionist money can bribe most the attendance.

I stood up for myself in the playground and anyone that wanted to charge me 1p for taking a piss in the bogs soon go taught a lesson.

too be honest i'm not a fan in anyway of the muslims but iserail, it's banksters and it's partner, the USA are playing a double act that needs to be stopped before more kids are starved to death or denied medical treatment in the open prison called Gazza.

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 04:02 PM
reply to post by Doc Holiday

I mean no offense here because you seem like a real straight shooter but I think you're a little off base here. Think of it this way, your neighbor has been killing your animals, has been slowly taking over your land, destroying the crops in your fields, etc for years. You've been fighting back but your .22 is nothing compared to his AR-15. His acreage almost completely surrounds your land and the only realistic way in is a lake. He doesn't let anything come into your property without his permission.

Now is it really in his authority to control what you get to bring onto your property through the lake? Does he have the authority to inspect the cargo in those ships that are going to your property?

That's just the way I see it.

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 04:15 PM
How about using more BRAINS next time? I mean, we can surely nuke those ships. That will be more force. But it will sink us too, right?
If someone plans to stop those ships too (highly probably) i hope that they do not plan another Hollywood movie with helicopter and commandos but to safely land police with non-lethal weapons and riot shields. This might be more force then paint ball guns, but surely less force then live bullets and 9-15 dead.

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 04:43 PM

Originally posted by Shadowfoot
reply to post by A por uvas

Here here thats the right response...."what WOULD Ghandi do?"

Gandhi would have kept trying to reach the port again and again untill he suceeded.

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 05:53 PM
Here's an Idea for the next ship challenges the Naval Blockade. After all attempts to caution them to change course instruct them that they will be blown out of the water if they do not change course.

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 05:58 PM

Originally posted by Shadowfoot
reply to post by A por uvas

Here here thats the right response...."what WOULD Ghandi do?"

he would have left the food to go to the palestinians

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 06:01 PM
reply to post by mike_trivisonno

Umm, there were 3 Palestinians on board. 3.

There were several European politicians and a Jewish woman who survived the Holocaust. She is fighting jihad for the Muslims?

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 06:10 PM
Fortunately we do not have to worry about how bad Israel is going to hurt anyone else...They, along with Egypt, have relaxed the blockade. I have a thread created with the news from the AP, check it out:

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 06:20 PM
4 turkish vessels headed for the eastern med. sea...
Turkish fleet will sail to the eastern Mediterranean m_content%26task%3Dview%26id%3D12445%26Itemid%3D139&sl=el&tl=en

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 06:33 PM
Fools and idiots.. The madness continues.. I wonder how many more lives will be lost to the bloodlust of isreal.. Humanity will never learn..

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 06:36 PM

Originally posted by SWCCFAN
Here's an Idea for the next ship challenges the Naval Blockade. After all attempts to caution them to change course instruct them that they will be blown out of the water if they do not change course.

What makes you think they didn't try that this time.

They blocked all the phones so few of the pictures could get out and will seize all pictures and will only show ones that paint a picture iserail wants shown to the world.

Media might be under zionost control but the internet is not so that forces the media to show some that are on the edge and to then offer bias reporting.

Anyway i've had a stock tip to invest in a paintball manufacture so i'll be rich

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 06:40 PM
I would love to see every developed country send one (1) humanitarian ship into Gaza in an International Flotilla.

What would you do then Israel ?? Would you dare attempt to attack ??

I do not think so. That is all it would take to break your ILLEGAL blockade.

Sickened by your murderous act. Disgusted by your defiance.


posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 06:42 PM
Stop press

News just in that iserail is easing the blockade and the next post is Turkey is sending in military suport ships.

Yes who's fighting on the back foot now

Stuff the easing that will get twisted to mean any number of things so lets go for the total lifting of the ilegal blockade so we all know what we are talking about.

I'm booking my holiday in Turkey as we speak, well done and iserail you can save it this time.

[edit on 1-6-2010 by LieBuster]

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 07:08 PM
This event was Israels Tiananmen square.

Had Israel of been China in 89, they would of bull dozed that lone protestor then argued he posed a threat to the tanks.

A turning point I believe.

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 07:19 PM
What gives them the right to inspect anything when they won't allow themselves to be inspected? They have undeclared WMDs and refuse to sign the NPT or allow inspections. I am wondering how much of the relief items that they have deemed acceptable are actually reaching the people they are intended for. Who is holding them accountable for the items and are their warehouses being inspected and an actual tally of the relief being kept? What is deemed as "acceptable" by them. I was reading on here that construction materials that were shipped were deemed as unacceptable and wouldn't be forwarded to the intended recipients. I'd like to see an escort made up of U.N. member or NATO member navies. Let's see Israel try and bully them.

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 07:23 PM

Originally posted by Doc Holiday
reply to post by heineken

I am not going to voice my opinion about this...just give an example, take it as you will.

Reverse this, if the aid ships were coming to a port in NY and refused to let inspectors see the cargo...I think the USA would do the same.

I think this has been an ongoing problem there, this is by no means the 1st time an aid ship[ refused inspectors...and they have in past times been loaded with firearms and weapons...rather than the food they claimed was on board.

But I do not follow this or keep tabs on this, it is not an interest of in short I am just wasting o2 in saying what I did...
peace...I hope this does not get more killed...maybe the aid/protesters, will allow an inspection now..

ETA I spellls badd

[edit on 1-6-2010 by Doc Holiday]

Because holocaust survivors and members of european parliment are known to smuggle guns, right?

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 07:43 PM
Though Israel has the right to use force to get hold of those "activists", I hope they will be better prepared and choose a more peacful solution.

They could disable the engines of the ships and just tow it to the nearest port. These so called activists aren't worth more negative PR for Israel. If they really wanted to help Gaza, they would unload the aid in Ashdod and go peacefully.

There is already enough hatred in the midde east without some selfrighteous jackasses provoking further agression.

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 09:59 PM
There are already ways to get aid into Gaza. Why did these folks choose a method they knew was prohibited? Seems to me that if they truly wanted this "HUMANITARIAN AID" to get in then they would have done so another way.

This had nothing to do with aid...they were using "HUMANITARIAN AID" as a cover to try to break a blockade that everyone already knew was being enforced.

posted on Jun, 1 2010 @ 10:04 PM
reply to post by princeofpeace

Correct sir, and I don't remember any "flotilla's" dispatched to any other countries in need of humanitarian aid recently, although an air drop would seem much more efficient, kinda hard to damage concrete if dropped by plane..... In time, all in good time....

new topics

<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in