No Sissy Boys Allowed.

Originally posted by 197rosemont
hahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahah

Well that was worth posting.

Gender roles are a social construct. What defines a man is the functional chemistry of his body and the content of his character. Though I do admit, this is an amusing article and I wouldn't mind seeing a little more care given to the way we raise our young. In general, I think this is a good thing. So long as it isn't pushed to extremes, I say go for it.

Really stupid. People don't even know what masculinity is. It's simply GENDER.

The whole "men are violent, aggressive and evil while women are pussy are passive" is just retarded. This usually only applies to the sexual ACT (not necessarily the act of getting sex either) where the male has to insert penis in vagina but sometimes the women will be the one doing the action rather than the male.. And when the case is that the female is physically weaker and the male is physically stronger. Otherwise, all this "it's manly to be inherently aggressive and violent and evil" trend of thought is really stupid.

In the animal kingdom there are many times when the female is stronger, or that the male does things a human female would do. But they don't have the pride like we do. It doesn't matter they are still male/females.

A man can be anything they want. Both men AND women should be strong. Only time we really even have to be violent is when we are defending ourselves, and in that we should only be offensive/defensive. Not unnecessarily starting fights, and ACTUALLY decreasing our chances as a species/individual of survival.

Bloody masochists and fiends.

And it's wrong for women to simply reject a male because he's "not aggressive" or "violent" like her perception of males. This is perhaps the one biggest problem as to why things in the domestic scene are so effed up. Males grow up thinking they have to act bad and brutal and pick on others just to secure a woman and that's how # starts. Or that they have to be unnecessarily competitive and aggressive while the women have to be weak and passive, unable to do things by herself.

I hope this Chinese school doesn't teach their kids to be like violent and unnecessarily aggressive and stuff. That's actually weakening. if they know what yin and yang is, and yin and yang is usually also a social construct as well. Both complementary opposites choose to be the way they are (in the long run).

[edit on 2-6-2010 by The Quiet Storm]

[edit on 2-6-2010 by The Quiet Storm]

Interesting. I actually do agree that for the most part, people in general are alot 'softer' than they used to be. But then again we watch these tv shows that show the strict housewife and the coward husband. Media in general is whats doing it. I also agree with the whole bullying thing. It's just part of growing up. Beating your children was also a very common thing ..now it's frowned apon.

I dont agree with the metrosexual thing though... well to a point. No reason why I cant be a 'real man' and still look damn good while doing it. I'm not saying I'm gonna dress up in a skirt and put make up on, but I have my occasional trips to the tanning salon?

Some cold, hard facts supporting the Chinese school curriculum.

Homosexuality results in numerous health problems to those who practice it, including increases in AIDS, other STDs, colon and rectal cancer, and hepatitis. According to the Center for Disease Control, more than 82% of all known sexually-transmitted AIDS cases in 2006 were the result of male-to-male sexual contact. Moreover, gay and bisexual men account for more than 60% of all syphilis cases.

Homosexuality shortens the life span of homosexuals, on average from 8 to 20 years. Smoking, on average, reduces life span by 7 years. Since we discourage smoking, why would we entertain the idea of endorsing homosexuality?

Homosexuality spreads disease to innocent people who never engage in homosexual sex. A prominent example is Ryan White, the teenage boy who died of AIDS after a blood transfusion. There are thousands of Ryan Whites according to the CDC. Nearly 10,000 known cases of innocent people in the United States who have contracted AIDS the same way. Moreover, there are thousands of innocent heterosexuals (many are spouses) who have contracted STDs via sexual contact with bisexuals.

Homosexuality costs Americans millions in higher health insurance premiums because increased health costs from homosexual behavior are reflected in those premiums. In fact, the homosexual lobby has induced some states to prevent insurers from asking potential consumers any medical questions, including if they are HIV positive! As a result, every consumer is paying a higher premium because insurance companies are prevented from identifying clients who engage in high-risk sexual behavior.

“We cannot deny that HIV is a gay disease. We have to own up to that and face up to that.” - National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Leader, Matt Foreman.

In an ironic twist, a group of Canadian "queers," to use the gay media's term, have filed a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission, charging the nation's entire health care system with homophobia. In what may wind up in the "What were they thinking?" file, they've dug a deep hole for themselves by demanding that more attention be given to "the many health issues that are endemic to our community."

What would those "endemic" issues be? Well, here is their list, not mine: lower life expectancy, higher rates of substance abuse, depression, HIV/AIDS, anal cancer, suicide, and higher rates of breast cancer and cervical cancer among lesbians.

Homosexual couples also have higher rates of domestic violence than do heterosexual couples, especially among lesbians. Susan Holt, coordinator of the domestic violence unit of the L.A. Gay Lesbian Center, said that "domestic violence is the third largest health problem facing the gay and lesbian community today and trails only behind AIDS and substance abuse in terms of sheer numbers and lethality.

Homosexuality is not genetic, nor an inherited trait. If it were, it could not be altered by mere choice. You cannot choose to be Caucasian, blonde, tall, or attractive. But homosexuals can choose to alter their behavior.

"Homosexuals have been known to change." - International Journal of Psychiatry.

"There is no DNA or medical test to determine if someone is homosexual. Sexual orientation is a matter of self-affirmation and public declaration." - Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays (PFOX)

If you are a homosexual, give this information some serious thought. Don’t let someone else keep you enslaved to a dangerous lifestyle when you could enjoy a much more abundant life.

"Facts are stubborn things, and whatever may be our wishes, our inclination, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." - John Adams, patriot leader of the Revolutionary War and 2nd President of the USA.

Thanks acrux for the encouraging post. Finally some opposition in the schools to the deviants who have hijacked much of our educational system. Some examples are:

1. Horror stories in your schools - Mass Resistance
2. Gay Porn as Required Reading in Ill. High School - News Busters
3. Sex education program sparks outcry- Toronto Sun

I don't give a rat's ass what people want to do in the confines of their closets, but I'll be damned if I let them try and convince a schoolroom full of impressionable kids that sodomy, rimming and and fisting are normal and healthy activities.

The Chinese have got the right idea and the aforementioned facts evidence that.

reply to post by truthlieshere


That's the most ignorant thing I've read in a long time.

You are making huge sweeping statements agianst people that are all different.

Maybe since the vast majority of pedophiles are straight males, maybe we should ban all striaght males from gong anywhere near children.

The vast majority of rapes are commited by straight males, therefore should we castrate all straight men once they reach purerty and keep their sperm in a sperm bank so they can have kids in the future.

The vast majority of murders are commited by straight males, maybe we should stick a chip in their heads and at the first sign of any aggresion send in the police.

Well I dunno who these hoards of metrosexual guys are, but they ain't round my area. Maybe they all got wiped out by the local populace, it's kinda fight or flight around these parts (they're probably in "that London", in the wussy south ).

Personally, I'm a good old fashioned scruffy blokey bloke, jeans and a metallica T-shirt. Short, cropped hair and a couple of days facial growth and I generally don't give a damn about what other people think. It's just the way I feel comfortable.

As long as you look after your body and your health and keep your personal hygeine to a high level, everything else is just vanity. I think the same about women too, most are far too vain. A minimum of make-up (if you want to) and nice hair is all you need ladies, not a £100 hairstyle and half the stockroom of Avon!

BTW, I'm 28, so I'm still young enough to be "in the loop" when it comes to fashion. I just don't give a damn!

Originally posted by truthlieshere
t sodomy, rimming and and fisting are normal and healthy activities.

You seem to know so much about gay sex.

Sadly, I don't know where you've been getting that information from but let me tell you something that may shock you.

Not all gay men do that.

Some straight men like to do those things too with their lady.

One of my straight mates tells me he keeps trying to "accidentaly" slip it up his girlfriends wrong hole mid sex all the time, as his new girlfriend won't let him do it. He's a persistant bugger, I kind of feel for his girl.

Originally posted by Tykonos
One of my straight mates tells me he keeps trying to "accidentaly" slip it up his girlfriends wrong hole mid sex all the time, as his new girlfriend won't let him do it. He's a persistant *bugger*

Was this meant to be a pun?

What you're saying is true. I have gay friends and from what I've been told, many never actually have penatrative sex at all!

Buy hey, let's just start generalising shall we

[edit on 3-6-2010 by nik1halo]

[edit on 3-6-2010 by nik1halo]

Originally posted by nik1halo

Originally posted by Tykonos
One of my straight mates tells me he keeps trying to "accidentaly" slip it up his girlfriends wrong hole mid sex all the time, as his new girlfriend won't let him do it. He's a persistant *bugger*

Was this meant to be a pun?

[edit on 3-6-2010 by nik1halo]

[edit on 3-6-2010 by nik1halo]

I didn't notice, I'm not that clever

Perhaps one of the number one causes of "sissyness" in men is loneliness, ie lack of sex, or a woman in their life. Those guys who were left virgin at the end of high school and even up to the later years in college... They never became men. They were but not a "biological male". They were left alone, while other males got all the women, and most of them were evil men. In this case the women were like initiates, making men of boys, but in america at the age of adolescence (or even before). Virgin males are probably are many times more like men than the other males. But society shuns them, thus they are forced to live immature lives. Socially and sexually immature, inexperienced, and weakened by their loneliness and dispolarity. That's not to say that monks can't be celibate, but they have an environment and practices that lets them withstand it. Plus they're not asocial within their community. Besides it's much better to practice sacred sex, tantra, brahmacharya and karezza. But this form of sex is much outcast in American society because it implies male "sissyness" which it most certainly is not, that's just a misunderstanding.

What do you see nowadays? Bisexuality is becoming a trend. It is being engineered.

I'm not gay, nor a sissy but I know what's going on. People are lonely as hell and they are being brainwashed by the mass media. Women have been brainwashed to like only evil men, and to be infidel to their partners as if it's normal and 'natural'. The evil men too support this too, women can also just leave those evil men alone and encourage the good men and their good deeds. Oh right, but those evil men will just come back and fear women into being their slaves? The media also plays into this too. They portray good men as weak and evil men as strong, therefore no man can be inbetween. If he's good he's seen as weak, if he's evil, he's seen as strong. So then where are the good strong men? apparently there are none. The ones who come close, who are "good" but aren't even that strong because they end up being too cocky and prideful jackasses and are arrogant, and greedy with all the females like they're self righteous, so that makes them a little evil. But women like the arrogance and the cockiness because they've been brainwashed to think they like it.

Not enough good strong men in the world you say? Or good women? You all breed this. You all created it. Neither men or women are excluded.

It's the depopulation of good males, of all good, male or female, in America and in other parts of the world.

And hopefully this school doesn't just bully men into being stronger. That isn't the way (obviously). The real way is to be a true teacher, and to help out your fellow men if he's weak, not do him more harm by bullying him. That'll harden his heart unfortunately, and make him stiff, cold and breakable..

[edit on 3-6-2010 by The Quiet Storm]

Originally posted by Tykonos

Originally posted by 197rosemont
hahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahah

Well that was worth posting.

Well that was worth posting as well.

sorry

[edit on 3-6-2010 by acrux]

reply to post by andy1033


Truly, if you desire respect.. stop calling all females hoes. How are your comments to be construed as passive? You seem very aggressive to me.

Long time reader but first post from the middle kingdom.

Only thing to say really is....... Most Shanghai men were taught to cook by their mums and most Shanghai girls can't cook at all..... Many Shanghai women can't find a "real" Shanghai man..... all sissy boys..... lol.

Good to see the teacher noticed there are too many pansies and wants to teach them to be real men. What they learn at school disappears by the time they get home though.....

Zhengzhou isn't that far from Shanghai. Anything within 2 provinces of the ocean is considered the middle of China.

[edit on 3-6-2010 by lifeiswhatitis]

[edit on 3-6-2010 by lifeiswhatitis]

Though i do not agree with the views of homosexuals in this OP, i do agree that males throughout the past years are becoming increasingly '**SNIP**'..

Link to a thread awhile back about this: www.abovetopsecret.com...

I've always, since i was of age, dated men older than me.. not once have i gone with anyone my own age or younger because they were little boy-like regardless of their actual age in numbers. and over the past years have often wondered where REAL men are going? its quite a scary realization that this is happening, even worse now than it was when i was growing up..the mentality of teachers and authoritive figures today of not fighting back, not defending ones own self, family, home etc..but to run to the teacher or the police and cry about it, doesnt help the situation any..
Boys/males have become and are becoming wussy push overs while the women are becoming un naturally dominant. scary indeed.

edited for spelling

[edit on 3-6-2010 by Full_Vision]

[edit on 3-6-2010 by Crakeur]

reminder: www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 3-6-2010 by Crakeur]

i dont think it's that men are really even being pussified. For a long time men have been picking on each other and calling each other wimps, "not real men", bullying etc. this is not new. Do you really think the difference between men and 'sissy' is that one bullies and another is not?

It's really the main way men compete with each other for sex and domination, with fear and degrading the other men in other people's eyes, ESPECIALLY women. And they fall for it, because "oh he's not a 'REAL' man" because, I am brave enough to do evil and he's not, or brave enough to commit vile acts, etc. And the women eat it up because feminists are always telling her to 'pick the man with BALLS (as if there are men that don't have any). I mean really the "pussification" is not new. It's only perceived as new because people are throwing around the word "pussification" a lot more often, and it all started with the PUA community.

Men just find it hard to approach the opposite sex for sex well because we've been taught it's perverted, or "immature" or whatever else. It's taboo. The only ones who do are those guys who are brutes. But women don't ever want to change that or help, they want guys to do all the work, all the time, and stick their noses up at any other man who wants to respect them, or be careful with them because well, sex is taboo, and it's against their principle to demean women, and call them hoes, and bitches like the brutes do.

I mean, really the whole idea of the pussification of men really only came about when the whole PUA culture came out, and started calling every other 'non PUA community cultured man' pussies, and 'not real man'. They invented the word metrosexuals. They are the ones who call any man who actually wants a REAL relationship, fidelity, mutually exclusive bonds and a thing called "love", 'weak' and 'pussified'.


DAvid DeAngelo. One of the pioneers if not the biggest pioneer of the PUA (Pickup artist). He coined the term "Cocky and Funny" a technique to get laid. Revolutionary yeah, I know.
Gary Brodsky came out with a PUA book called "BLACK OP AND PSY-OP CIA TACTICS TO GET WOMEN".

I wouldn't doubt the PUA culture has been used by the "emasculation/dehumanization/depopulation" agenda.

No joke.
That and coupled with feminist culture, which was also lead by the CIA, gives us an impression of a REAL dehumanization emasculation of males conspiracy, and it's way more complicated than "men are being pussified".

it's more like men are being brainwashed to accept untruths and false principles, and the women as well have been corrupted, ever since the feminist movement.

[edit on 3-6-2010 by The Quiet Storm]

reply to post by acrux

Originally posted by acrux

Originally posted by Tykonos

Originally posted by 197rosemont
hahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahah

Well that was worth posting.

Well that was worth posting as well.

Well so was that.

[edit on 3-6-2010 by YissakharMelech]