reply to post by Allar
I know that they are against freedom of speech ..particularly on this topic by the manner in which they treated her in the media. This is an indicator
of how they censor people who do not go along with their views. They immediately dug up whatever they could on her to post and paste it across the
nation. This is called intimidation techniques for speaking out on a topic or view in a manner in which they disapprove. It is called censorship.
Another word for this in reference to jfj123's post is that they "Judged" her. Obviously they approve of judging again ..in censorship..in only one
direction. They are not as tolerant as they expect from others.
Someone asked her opinion on a topic...and when they did not give an approved answer....they censored her. They deliberately activated a whole machine
to go after her. One definition of censor/censorship...is a formal reprimand...to be formally reprimanded.
This is what a whole media did.
I found this to be in extremely bad taste, method, and motive. It is a form of intimidation..coercion...particularly when this contestant did not ask
the question. This method is very telling when you see it used over and over and over...to attempt to control/censor other peoples and realize that
the media and body politic is in on it.
They are not in favor of this kind of free speech. That is obvious to people who can think for themselves. We are going to see more of this kind of
censorship/reprimand...lack of free speech. Buckle up.
you posted ..
Freedom of speech. It may be annoying but if you curtail freedom of speech for one group, it'll happen for others.
Agree here...this is already happening in the case of the homosexual groups. They do not tolerate freedom of speech by those who oppose them...and
particularly anyone in the public. They have organized a whole machine to go after them and dig up any kind of dirt on them in order to
censor/reprimand them in the media...or press. And the press goes along with it. And the media in this country is a shill for the body politic. I
call this a default setting...like this computer..it is allowed to play through...unquestioned ..unchallenged by opposing views.
This is to thinking people...what is on the outside..not on the inside. I should not have to tell you this. I am not interested in the
sexuality of others in this manner..hetero or homo and don't find it at all enlightening.
to which you replied..
You must not like black people for the same reason then.
It is you back on your earlier post, page 8, who stated people should be judged by what is on the inside...not on the outside. Remember that??
Here is your quote??
Might I suggest finding a deep, dark cave and move in then. People are finally becoming enlightened enough to judge people based on who they
are on the inside instead of who they are on the outside. This is what is called ENLIGHTENMENT.
The concept of what I am speaking ..is obviously very difficult for you to fathom in your emotive state.
Sexuality is a personal and private matter. Once you come out in the open with it and attempt to glorify yourself by your sexuality..you become
open..on the outside ..not inside. And when you are ignorant enough to use your sexuality as the total/sole claim to fame and entitlement..you are now
on the outside..showing your ignorance.
Only public education/entitlement beliefs can dumb and stupid a person down so far that they think this is a standard of excellence in anything.
When you are dumb enough to believe in this entitlement enough to go after people who disagree with you and voice their opinions ..you are showing
your motives and entitlement beliefs.
I am not speaking here against sexuality..I am speaking against ignorance. This concept seems to escape you in your emotive state.
What this group of which I am speaking has done is moved from inside/internal characteristics and traits to outside/external traits and then boast of
it as excellence and demand the right to be passed/play through as excellence...to be accepted based on their sexuality.
I don't agree. I don't think it is smart, enlightened, or intelligent.
And now here in drama you attempt to broaden out your Hitler technique by implying I am a racist and don't like black people. You are scrapping the
bottom of the barrel in attempting your own method to do what this person Perez Hilton did to the contestant. I finally look up the name.
It does not work on me. You need to get out more. To practice real enlightenment, intelligence, and tolerance.
Could you post an example with source showing "them" attempting to censor someone?
I am astonished that you should even ask this question after how this group and the media shilling for them treated this woman. It should be obvious
how they reprimanded/censored this contestant for speaking her mind..after it was Perez who asked her the question. Shame on him and this movement.
They obviously have no shame..no honor..only entitlement motives...ie...expediency.
And entitlement motives is becoming the modus operandi for many groups today.
I posted ..
What I am against is such cheap drama techniques in order to censor her or anyone else who disagrees with a position.
to which you replied..
You must really hate Christians, Republicans, FOX NEWS, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbough, and Hannity then.
Good point here you have made. I particularly don't like Sean Hannity because of a technique he uses in cutting off his guests, when they make their
point or positions, in order to get his/Hannity's points across. I call this bullying. It is exactly what the Homosexual groups and the media do and
did to this contestant in the pageant..in reprimand/censorship/bullying.
The other person of whom I also dislike and disagree is this Chris Matthews. Chris does exactly what Hannity does and I don't like or approve of it
from either. In each case it is a type of rudeness and bullying/censorship.
That's what it sounds like to me. I'm just reading what you're writing
You are indeed reading what I am writing. But it is obvious by your posts that you are very emotive...combined with a heavy dose of drama/entitlement.
No problem with me here ..I merely make note of it for the readers out here.
And you're using the same technique to try and smear me I love IRONY
Once again I am not the one using the Hitler/Nazi smear techniques. In your emotive and entitled state this seems to escape you. Once again..I point
OOPS who knew that would come back to haunt you so quickly
Sorry jfj123. But when you resort to this kind of mockery..it comes across as desperation and trying to get in the last word. Very feminine and also
insecure. No problem by me. It does not work on me ..just like the Hitler techniques.
We all partially define ourselves based on our sexuality.
Notice I said "partially" ? And yes we do. It's in our genes.
Yes you did say "partially." The problem here with this group and the media using/misusing it to deceive us, is that this group ...exclusively uses
sexuality to define themselves. I called this ...method..stupid.
It is a deceptive technique you use in trying to put everyone out here in the same box as this group which uses its sexuality to demand acceptance.
Not very smart of you. Partially is not the same as what this group is doing.
And also ...partially is not publicly or exclusively. I should not have to tell you this difference.
Yes I do It just shows you're not very tolerant of people with different views then yourself.
This is exactly my point about this group and the media and politicians shilling for them.
And we also have groups who's total claim to fame is being christian, muslim, black, mexican, italian, etc...
Your losing me here..apples and oranges..
And yet another attempt at drama
Of course I'm not stating that. If this is a problem, remove religion and add African American or Italian American, etc....
I am not the one going off on all these tangents in order to support my emotions and drama.
You have a very heavy affinity for the flesh and fleshly examples. No problem by me. I merely make note of the difference in motives and methods of
operation between you and myself.
You are very much willing to go on different tangents to justify your belief system. Your religion if you like because you are obviously very devout
and zealous in it.
Not everyone out here is of the flesh. I think you have great difficulty with this concept and must attempt to drag others in to the flesh...where you
are and your faith is. You are not accustomed to dealing with people not in this venue of yours for which you take for granted as being normal and
The rest of your post is just mockery so I wont bother replying to it.
I think with practice and thinking that you can do better than you currently are capable.
Hope you one day are able to figure life out....outside the flesh...internal concepts verses what you are currently doing...external.
I would offer you this suggestion to help you in your posting. Leave the scattered drama techniques at home...try some history, real knowledge and
backbone when making your posts. I say this because the drama techniques cover up alot of insecurity...in lieu of real worthy points.
With so many posters out here today...emotions are what passes for excellence and the moral ethical high ground today. I don't happen to think so.