It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SparKzzz
Yeah, take it easy.
Just show me the little bit of proof needed to convince me that what you say is true. I don't demand specific details like you try to put it.
All I'm asking is a proof that will show me that there was a casualty before Israeli troops landed. Or anything else that will say Israelies shot at the ships from a-far.
I have so far provided proof for my claim. The soldiers didn't shoot a single bullet before landing on the ship and meeting heavy hostility and violence. One got thrown off of the top floor of the ship to it's bottom.
When you are hitting an armed force expect the armed force to retaliate. Soldiers went aboard the other ships aswell, was there any casualty in ANY of them? No, there wasn't. Why? Because there was not a violent uproar in any of them.
Don't try to make things complicated and say I'm asking for difficult things. You guys said you KNOW people have died before the IDF has landed on top of the ships, so please support the proof.
I present the videos once again and STILL demand proof for the lies you spread:
Please privode the damned proof and get it over with.
...I'm assuming you'll avoid it once again and claim I'm asking for too much.
Anyway this was indeed a succesful flotila that has achieved what it wanted - A headline.
[edit on 31-5-2010 by SparKzzz]
Originally posted by Counttrarian
Originally posted by SparKzzz
Yeah, take it easy.
Just show me the little bit of proof needed to convince me that what you say is true. I don't demand specific details like you try to put it.
All I'm asking is a proof that will show me that there was a casualty before Israeli troops landed. Or anything else that will say Israelies shot at the ships from a-far.
I have so far provided proof for my claim. The soldiers didn't shoot a single bullet before landing on the ship and meeting heavy hostility and violence. One got thrown off of the top floor of the ship to it's bottom.
When you are hitting an armed force expect the armed force to retaliate. Soldiers went aboard the other ships aswell, was there any casualty in ANY of them? No, there wasn't. Why? Because there was not a violent uproar in any of them.
Don't try to make things complicated and say I'm asking for difficult things. You guys said you KNOW people have died before the IDF has landed on top of the ships, so please support the proof.
I present the videos once again and STILL demand proof for the lies you spread:
Please privode the damned proof and get it over with.
...I'm assuming you'll avoid it once again and claim I'm asking for too much.
Anyway this was indeed a succesful flotila that has achieved what it wanted - A headline.
[edit on 31-5-2010 by SparKzzz]
Since you claim I am avoiding something or the other, can you please point out 1 instance on this or any other board where I said that there was a casualty BEFORE the troops landed?
You are trying to obfuscate the discussion, a tactic used when your narrative isn't supported by the facts.
While some may applaud your subtle deceptive rhetoric, please refrain from spreading untruths about anything I have posted.
Originally posted by AquaTim84
reply to post by SparKzzz
No in that perspective it's not hard to comprehend. But I don't think it's as simple as that.
They had to do something to aid those people. No matter what, they would still be blocked by a blockade on the sea or a dock. They would not have let any cargo through. If that's all they needed to do than they would have took the order to let them check for suspicious cargo. I don't think that there that ignorant and at the same time are trying to help people.
Keep in mind that these people do more for others then for themselves. Risk taking is part of trying to change a situation with good intentions.
Now if israel was scared because maybe they wanted to bring weapons to fight for "freedom" in Gaza than that's something else.
Originally posted by rationaluser
Are you telling me that the "superior" Israeli offense force couldn't draw up a plan to land on the ship and controll the situation i didn't see any riot shields on that ship i didn't see any flashbangs or cs gas to disperse crowds and i see the fail that is dropping commando's in BY CHOPPER who was the strategic retard that drew up this plan.
Originally posted by TheOracle
For all the Israel apologists
The Gaza blockade is illegal, I repeat ILLEGAL
The ships were in international waters
Palestine may not be a sovereign state but its waters are RECOGNIZED
The peace activists specifically chose not to use Israel's channels for the reasons stated above. I will repeat it once again, the blockade is ILLEGAL.
And it is clear that:
The convoy contained no weapons for Hamas
Commandos have plenty of non lethal ways to stop the activists
(rubber bullets, cs gas, tasers, flashbangs ...) But no they had to KILL peaceful people.
There is not a single argument to defend Israel.
Originally posted by icepack
are you kidding me ? you really want to image the seizing of the ship like a bunch of monsters, bloodthirsty, just entered the ships to kill people and that because they have fun doing it.
you are painting a picture that cant be real.
Originally posted by clay2 baraka
Originally posted by rationaluser
Are you telling me that the "superior" Israeli offense force couldn't draw up a plan to land on the ship and controll the situation i didn't see any riot shields on that ship i didn't see any flashbangs or cs gas to disperse crowds and i see the fail that is dropping commando's in BY CHOPPER who was the strategic retard that drew up this plan.
In all fairness, when I was watching the live feed, I saw the the commandos storm in equipped with sub-machine guns (contrary to the pistol/paintball gun disinformation in a previous post) and grenade launchers loaded with CS gas which they did employ.
[edit on 5/31/2010 by clay2 baraka]
Originally posted by Gorman91
It's a blockade. You try to pass it, you get shot. This was stupid.
Also I love how everyone is like "BAH, ISRAEL TRUE COLORS", "BAH, ISRAEL WILL PAY".
No. No one will pay. If any of you had any training in international affairs, you would know exactly what is going to happen. Who ever sent the convoy is going to be pissed, bah humbugs back and forth, and then it will be forgotten about within a few weeks. And I guarantee most of you won't even recall this a year later.
Stop getting all up in arms. All this shows is that Israel is serious business and not bending to anyone trying to push it. Which for all intensive purposes, it's pretty cool.
In every war there have been blockades. And blockades do what blockades do. If you don't know what they do, then don't act like this is some kind of war crime or evil act.
This is Business as usual. No change. No war.
Originally posted by SparKzzz
UGH I'm sick and tired of the international waters arguement.
What if they stormed the ships 5 minutes later on, in Israeli waters, would it be OK to you? No, don't be a hypocrite, you'd find something else to whine about.
International waters or not, they were headed to Gaza shores, a place that not so long ago ships were unloading missiles and rockets at. I'm repeating myself so much and people aren't getting anything.
Who in their sane minds is going to let a ship dock in it's shoreline? WHO? Name one country that will allow an unrecognized ship to dock wherever it wants without going onboard to inspect it, and I'LL HEAD THERE RIGHT NOW.
IDF didn't wake up today and said YEAH LET'S GO GET SOME PEACE ACTIVISTS!
It's purpose in this operation was to lead the ships to Ashdod peacefully and have the cargos examined.
How else was Israel supposed to convince them not to go DIRECTLY, UNEXAMINED into Gaza to unload unchecked materials? By just asking?
Do yourself a favor.
Anyway,
STILL waiting for the proof. ATS credibility going downhill FAST.
Originally posted by seagull
reply to post by SparKzzz
Unauthorized area? Since when are international waters an unauthorized area...?
A showdown with the Israeli navy appeared inevitable. Israel's deputy foreign minister, Danny Ayalon, reiterated Saturday that the ships would be intercepted, denouncing the sea convoy as a provocation and violation of maritime laws. Israel and Egypt imposed a blockade on Gaza after the Islamic militant Hamas seized the territory by force three years ago.
In Israeli waters? Since they weren't, the point you are attempting to make is fallacious. Hypocrite? Really? Point out where, sir... You'll find, if you bother to look, which I doubt...being easier to call names, that I'm one of the more vocal supporters of Israel. Just not blind to the fact that they screwed this up six ways from Sunday...
International waters are open to everyone. Not just those we deem to be harmless.
You track the vessel. You wait until it's in waters you, or an ally, control by international standards, then, and only then, do you board. That's the way it's supposed to work. You don't just arbitrarily, willy nilly, board it. That is, again, by the strict definition of the term, piracy...
No. Probably not. Their timing was, at the least, suspect however... Had they just waited until the boat/flotilla was in their own waters, half this outrage wouldn't be voiced.
I'm as aware of that as you are. The essence of the plan was fine. It's the execution (pardon the pun) that leaves much to be desired...