It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

N.Korea rejects warship sinking evidence

page: 1
3
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 29 2010 @ 02:56 AM
link   

N.Korea rejects warship sinking evidence


www.sbs.com.au

it torpedoed a South Korean warship with the loss of 46 lives, saying it does not own a midget submarine allegedly used for the March attack.

North Korea threatens to attack South
Korean tensions close to boiling point
South Korea flexes muscles as tensions rise
The North's powerful National Defence Commission (NDC), chaired by leader Kim Jong-Il, held a rare media conference on Friday and denied Pyongyang's involvement, according to official North Korean media.

Major General Pak Rim Su, director of the policy department of the NDC, said the North does not have a 130-tonne "Salmon-
(visit the link for the full news article)




posted on May, 29 2010 @ 02:56 AM
link   
No surprises here.Looks like the North are right onto this false flag incident or are they?Could they be playing on this to make it seem they aren't the aggressors.Its all very confusing, one minute they say they will destroy everything with nukes and the next they say we didn't sink your ship.They do come up with some good points on why they didn't sink it and if they did why not admit it ?Are we getting the full story here?I think not

www.sbs.com.au
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:05 AM
link   
reply to post by 12voltz
 


America wanted to keep the base in Japan, America kept the base in Japan, 2 weeks later you won't even here of the incident.

They got what they wanted through any means necessary.



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:06 AM
link   
They found parts of the exploded torpedo and it had an intact NK serial number on it. NK ALWAYS lies.



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:08 AM
link   
The Chinese now believe it definitely WAS a false flag operation, and North Korea were not involved.

There is also a theory now circling the internet that the US might have been responsible for this false flag attack.

As we all know the Japanese people want the large US air base located on Okinawa removed.
But the US definitely does not want to lose that base.
So the theory is, that the US ran a black operation to try to start up a war in Korea by blowing up the warship of an ally.

The US then points out to the Japanese how important a heavy US military presence in Japan is for security in the region.

It is a very powerful AND plausible motive, given recent events.



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
They found parts of the exploded torpedo and it had an intact NK serial number on it. NK ALWAYS lies.


You're living in the 20th century, how hard is it to setup a serial number?

Normal people create Key Generators for computer products, now look to another realm, imagine what the governments are capable of.



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:12 AM
link   
reply to post by Silver Shadow
 


Would they go to that much trouble to keep that airbase?They have other bases in the area ,Why is Okinawa so important that they start a war over it?

www.globalsecurity.org...



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by 12voltz
reply to post by Silver Shadow
 


Would they go to that much trouble to keep that airbase?They have other bases in the area ,Why is Okinawa so important that they start a war over it?

www.globalsecurity.org...

Its not a base, its a colony. Japan wants to become independent.

Japan is part of the US, the US invaded Japan remember? WWII? Two atom bombs?

People forget too fast.



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by 12voltz

Would they go to that much trouble to keep that airbase?They have other bases in the area ,Why is Okinawa so important that they start a war over it?


Would they go to all that trouble ?
How much trouble is it to buy a foreign torpedo on the black market and fire it at an ally from a US submarine ? No trouble at all.

The US does not like giving up large foreign military bases, no matter where they are located.
But that is now going to happen anyway, as nation after nation bit by bit slowly expels the US military around the world.





[edit on 29/5/2010 by Silver Shadow]



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:27 AM
link   
reply to post by LittleSecret
 



What you talkin bout Willis.I think Little boy and Fat man were delivered so they didn't have to invade japan .A living test site and to save soldiers from a land invasion which would have left many casulties



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by 12voltz
reply to post by LittleSecret
 



What you talkin bout Willis.I think Little boy and Fat man were delivered so they didn't have to invade japan .A living test site and to save soldiers from a land invasion which would have left many casulties

Who surrendered?

Don't waste my time..

If you are not willing to see the American empire, you don't have to, most of your fellow citizens are not seeing it as well.

So go join the club, you're not alone.



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:45 AM
link   
If North Korea sank that ship, you better believe the full force of South Korea, aka, America, would have came to kick some ass, and it sure wouldn't take 2 months.

This is nothing but a CIA false flag, like 9/11, Gulf of Tonkin, ect. to start a war.

However this fuse was a dud, and now they are trying to explain a friendly ship at the bottom of the sea.



[edit on 29-5-2010 by breakingdradles]



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:48 AM
link   
It makes a lot more sense DPRK did order the torpedo shot, than it being a false flag operation. Not everything is a conspiracy.



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by breakingdradles
If North Korea sank that ship, you better believe the full force of South Korea, aka, America, would have came to kick some ass, and it sure wouldn't take 2 months.

This is nothing but a CIA false flag, like 9/11, Gulf of Tonkin, ect. to start a war.

[edit on 29-5-2010 by breakingdradles]


Your logic just doesn't seem right. If the CIA wanted to start a war why has it not happened? Nearly everyone that matters believes NK did it so why has the US and SK not "kicked some ass"?



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
They found parts of the exploded torpedo and it had an intact NK serial number on it. NK ALWAYS lies.


Keep up!

www.reuters.com...

They all changed their story when the UN decided to send in a team to inspect the torpedo and investigate. It then became a German made torpedo... but NK still gets the blame.


The official line has more holes than a Swis cheese.


[edit on 29-5-2010 by Britguy]



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:54 AM
link   
reply to post by jonny2410
 


Did you read?


reply to post by Silver Shadow
 


They are still in Japan?



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:58 AM
link   
reply to post by LittleSecret
 


Well yes i did read actually thanks but i am responding to the idea that the goal of US is to start a war.

If the idea is, yes as predictable as ever..., that the US wants to start a war in the Korean Peninsula then simply answer the question - Why has it not happened?

Secondly and even more obviously, if the US or SK 'wants' war then why did they not just retaliate against the 'attack' on the ship back in March? They would have had every right to do so if they believed it was NK yet no military action has or is being taken. That does not seem like the actions of two countries desperate to set up a war..

[edit on 5/29/2010 by jonny2410]

[edit on 5/29/2010 by jonny2410]



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by Britguy

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
They found parts of the exploded torpedo and it had an intact NK serial number on it. NK ALWAYS lies.


Keep up!

www.reuters.com...

They all changed their story when the UN decided to send in a team to inspect the torpedo and investigate. It then became a German made torpedo... but NK still gets the blame.


The official line has more holes than a Swis cheese.


[edit on 29-5-2010 by Britguy]


LOL, The Germans are now supplying North Korea with torpedos?

Isn't that against sanctions?



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 03:59 AM
link   
even south koreans are divided on this issue i personaly dont belive it was the north, on of their torpedos yes but it wasnt them that fired it. i eagerly await to see what russias inspection reveals or dosnt. i can see why people mite think it is america due to the okinawa base thing and i find it plauseble. or maybe just regime change. i also think if attacked the north will put up more of a fight than people asume they will, "its so suvere what the hopeless will do"



posted on May, 29 2010 @ 04:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by Britguy

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
They found parts of the exploded torpedo and it had an intact NK serial number on it. NK ALWAYS lies.


Keep up!

www.reuters.com...

They all changed their story when the UN decided to send in a team to inspect the torpedo and investigate. It then became a German made torpedo... but NK still gets the blame.


The official line has more holes than a Swis cheese.


[edit on 29-5-2010 by Britguy]



german torpedo im pretty sure this was america now. thanx for the info



new topics

top topics



 
3
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join