reply to post by tooo many pills
Well you obviously did not read the entire thread, only the first comment/introduction which I posted, so I will help you out with a comment posted
later in that thread:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Was just surprised at the relationship between the two countries, and as stated here:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"As a British company, BP's expanding operation in Iran reflects symbolically the quiet growth of British-Iranian relations after about two decades
of difficulties. Particularly, it indicates the British government's efforts to expand its ties with Iran to catch up with other EU countries with
large and expanding political and economic relations with that country, namely France, Germany, Italy and increasingly so Spain. "
"Given its close cooperation with Iran's arch enemy, the United States, seeking to weaken Iran economically and politically, such efforts
demonstrates the British government's recognition of Iran's importance as a rising regional power." - Asia Times
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I find the analysis interesting, but personally don't happen to share the view of Iran as a rising regional power; and since BP maintains such an
active interest in Iran today, I was wondering if someone from BP might have made an informal/formal suggestion to Iran to offer its help to the U S
in the gulf oil spill.
There are always reasons/motivations behind these kinds of offers, and I am always interested in exploring all avenues of thought on same.
From a military standpoint, can you think of a better way to deflect
American interests away from the possible invasion/bombing of Iran which was gaining strong support about the same time the explosion occured, than to
cause a catastrophe of such a magnitude that the attention of the U S, and the world for that matter is focused on, and away from Iran?
And to possibly use a company, or an individual who is working within that company who's interests are mutually shared with yourself, such as
B.P.?
And then, as a possible shield, throw out an offer to help the U S in
this crisis, assuming that there is a chance that it is discovered that
the accident was actually sabotage, and the finger points to Iran.
Iran in turn could then say, we are not responsible, we even offered to
help the U S in this matter. Why we would offer such a thing if we were involved?....etc.
I think the president of Iran is clever, no question, but I trust him about as far as I can throw him.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is a question for thought, tooo many pills, not evidence, as defined by the question mark in the title. I believe it is definitely possible, and
would like to see some thought on same, not retorts with no substance please.
Comments welcome.
The thread is here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
[edit on 30-5-2010 by manta78]