I am not posting a comment to give an opinion about this, I felt it necessary however to add some information which seems to be missing from this
This story first broke over a week ago for me, and for others in the form of an email, the email sender is not important to any one other than those
who received it on the day because of content referring to other work being researched, the information regarding this particular story was not what
the email was about, it was added as a point of interest.
It appears some wording has been added and some has been removed from the story as told, take it or leave it that's down to who and what your purpose
is regarding the so called evidence offered up.
The original story never once mentioned Multi dimensional craft, posted here as hyperdimensional craft, I've seen as the story has developed
different versions being sent around the internet some trying to link with the Spirals (Hyperdimensional), and other recent events around the World,
whatever version is seen its changes which are being added, steer it to support some one else's agenda or theory, so please be aware of those
what the original story did report was, the person who took the pictures, who had worked for the White House during several Administrations, had been
getting the heads up from someone inside the Pentagon that these supposed craft where visiting and were well known about, what was reported was, the
objects have been arriving over the Capitol and passing at hypersonic speeds, he was told this information so that it could be set up to catch and
record them as they either passed by, or the part which did confuse me, so they could keep a record of their arrival as they landed close to
important buildings out of sight ( I don't know if it is possible for anything to land at such a speed or be out of sight of anyone) the arrival of
whatever these things are was expected and arranged is the impression I got.
The email went into details about why a record was needed to be kept as to their comings and goings, like any other historical event, destroying the
documentation of it is a big no no and illegal if what I understand is true? whether they are ET in origin I could care less because the story has
been tainted by the information being twisted as it got the attention of different media, and then twisted again as the opinions of self styled
experts got involved, by the time it got to ATS it was a different story altogether from what I can piece together, just by the changing and adding of
a few words, just enough to throw a hint of doubt which was sucked up and then passed on as expert opinions causing quite a lot of deflection onto a
person who really had nothing to do with it in the first place.
What I will say, is what was provided in the OP, is nowhere near all the information the story contained, that is not the fault of the OP, they just
posted what was in the story, I could care less, and I don't intend that to be insulting to anyone, there is no point in destroying the Mountain
which has already been built around this and several other related stories over the past several months, all mostly based on altered information IMO
simply to support another claim or theory put forward by someone else, give their money making spin seem more tangible if you want.
That then leads to the point because one part of the story can be called fake, then it all must be fake, which is far from the real truth, names get
added, then they are linked to someone else who, is then linked to one project or another and as the list grows the story becomes more and more
unreliable, then someone who has information about someone who was added into the story or linked to it by added pieces which were not even related to
the original story, that's when the whole thing is ripped apart, by using bits and pieces and people who never had any involvement in the original
event in the first place, they try and hijack it for their own purpose.
Example would be, a event happens in Mexico, well observed, well recorded, then it gets reported by Jaime Maussan, that would be enough for many on
here to instantly post they have doubts and call it fake or hoax, just because of his name being mentioned, even though he was not present or directly
involved in the event, unjustified IMO having met the man and found him to be pleasant and genuine, I find it hard to believe he would want to defraud
or hoax anything, he is just a presenter who some like and some dislike, yet many are willing to take the word of others that he does nothing but fake
everything, something which I would challenge anyone to provide evidence that he has ever done, its that kind of scenario which happens way too often,
and because some people are willing to accept the word of someone else that he is a problem, when its the problem the person calling foul on all his
work who really has the problem and are all to willing to push that opinion as fact.
If you looked for yourselves, you would see this to be the case, by seeing that you can then go back and have another look at the cases classed as
hoaxes and all the other excuses used which made you push aside that report or event, it would open up a lot of doors you would never have looked
through had you not been convinced he was untrustworthy, IMO Jaime Maussan has done some incredible work, given some fantastic lectures and presented
some amazing footage and images.
The latest kind of misdirection comes when the story breaks from what ever source, then instead of trying to cover it up, the story is simply altered,
adding information designed to raise an eyebrow or two, and other parts of the story removed or reworded to support it, IE Hypersonic changed to
Hyperdimensional, the first we know to exist, the second being just a theory already becoming the butt of many jokes, we know Hypersonic is real, we
don't know Hyperdimensional travel to be real, then add a source nobody knows about and let them have at it, meaning allow them to be ripped apart
just by throwing in a little doubt about who they are and where they got the story.
The picture of the firework for instance, it may be a long exposure of the firework, not however long enough to cover the fact whatever is passing
behind it was moving at an incredible rate of speed, over restricted air space as well? there where a lot more photographs in the original story also,
with analysis and covering different light spectrum's, which made for excellent reading I must say.
As for other events being definitively called Hoaxes, the deeper digging will help there also, you just need to keep in your head who claimed it a
hoax, on what information did they make that claim, and their questions and claims that if something like that was seen they would have stopped and
got out of the car to take a better video, take a look at the regulations covering where the video was shot from, and the rules about traffic laws in
that area, that will answer those claims right off, and remove the excuses given to support the hoax claims.
Think for yourselves, just because someone makes a claim they are an expert does not make it that way, same goes for me, all I can do is tell you what
I am aware of, that does not make what I am aware of the truth, but knowing the whole story allows everyone to create an unbiased opinion, without
having to rely on the words of a complete stranger to help you find the truth, digging deeper will get you close to what your looking for, just
remember the information will not be jumping out at you in big bold lettering, look for the subtle changes, then ask yourself why would someone change
what seems to be unimportant parts of the story.
Look at the responses to those changes for your answer to that one.
When all is said and done, its really only down to yourselves if you really want to get to what is really happening, rather than claiming to be an
expert, and knowing how an Alien race would act under any circumstance, How people trained in Observation and highly trained in their fields to fly
some of the worlds fastest and most high tech aicraft, people who we have trusted to keep their fingers close to the MAD button and do the job very
well, people who are trusted with technology which could kill millions, even the airliner Pilots who we trust to fly our families around the World as
well as ourselves, why when they come forward with what they have seen, are they then thrown into a class which would have them locked away for being
insane if some had their way.
Why are their reputations then thrown into doubt, when right up to the moment they opened their mouths they where trusted with jobs and information
only a few could be trusted to carry out that work? yet report something strange and describe it in detail, they then become dangerous and
untrustworthy, and don't forget my favourite, how the witnesses should have reacted, why didn't they have a camera with them, why didn't they have
a tripod, why are they shaking?
Many different ways and wants, different ways to approach the subject, to deal with the subject, or not to deal with the subject, all have one thing
in common, either way they need an answer one way or another, its how they get their answers that I find most important, something all of us need to
take into account IMO.
The evidence is out there, sadly most of the good evidence is put away in a drawer somewhere, because those who have it, are not ready to have their
lives ripped apart and their respectability called into doubt because someone has an issue with the subject matter, and has to find fault at all
costs, and the unwillingness of many to look at it without bringing the answers with them before even looking at it first, or by accepting the word of
a complete stranger on the internet, we have all seen the "NOTHING TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG" comment right?
Just how many of you did move along?