Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by Esoteric Teacher
You are determined to keep this thread alive.
You claim that since a phrase can have about 50,000 anagrams made out of it, finding one that makes sense with the original phrase points to the truth
easy, truisms from perspectives perhaps. an honest opinion from someone's view, i think.
try to look at it this way:
why am i bound to absolutley follow the gramatical rules i was taught in school all the time?
now, how many laws, rules, and ordinances exist in your society/nation?
Can you tell me the specific number of laws that are at this moment "on the books"?
if you are unable to even count them, how can you prove to me you are following them all without breaking them?
if i can't possibly live long enough to learn all the laws your society expects of me before i die, why do i have to live according to them?
ignorance of the law is no excuse, but ignorance of the law is manditory, isn't it?
i'm convinced this is a phenomenon that does exist, and i am certain there are those in positions of authority that know of this phenomenon as
That since out of 50,000 (or even more) just one phrase relates, that it is proof of anagrams being special.
not really just one phrase, i can usually accept more than one as having truth in it from certain perspectives. sort of like you have certain natural
skills and abilities that may serve you near perfectly in some circumstances, but not serve you well in other situations.
i know it is easy to look at some of them and think since it isn't gramatically correct, it can't have any truth in it.
However, people who say they can understand a man who doesn't speak at all (steven hawking) is a genius. Yet, even though his oration may be
negligible, am i really suppose to believe some cripple in a wheelchair is one of the smartest people on the planet?
Those huge numbers of anagrams from just one phrase is proof to me that they are NOT special. With those odds, I would be nearly shocked if there
wasn't one anagram that related to the original phrase. Searching through such huge numbers to find only one related phrase makes it highly
actually, i think the odds are against the results holding any truisms at all, especiallywhen some anagrams only manifest themselves as truisms when
something happens on a certain date, like when a "discovery" is made.
case and point, "dinosaurs", means "thunder lizard" in latin, and we named them "dinosaurs" hundreds of years ago.
now, in the past 15 years we "discovered" that fossilized evidence proves feathers came from the raptor class of dinosaurs.
so, did they die
out and go extinct?
they evolved into birds, and they soar
through the air like an eagle.
dinosaur = die? no! soar.
And these "special" anagrams are often mis-spelled and use poor grammar, or need an outside clarification or explanation to make them
why would this require "outside clarification", when it is being generated from internal mechanisms within yourself, as others, same as i am
contributing to the words and communication, and utilizing language now?
how are you seperate from the words you use to define everything you can define, with words?
sometimes i think they are just "cliff notes", like occahms/ocams razor. short with key words. like spead readers who just "skip" over all the
the, and, but, ..
when they read.
This is why I say it is so unremarkable. Why anagrams don't inherently hold a deep truth. It's random. It's chance.
i have experienced things which make me not believe it is random or chance, however random chance is one of the ingredients contributing to the
phenomenon, i believe. to discount the "wild" and "natural" within us would be to abandon individualism altogether, which would be a little
inconsistant with what my senses are telling me, that we are individuals.
Not a mystical subconscious hidden message of truth.
maybe not "mystical", but perhaps a technology or natural phenomenon we misinterpret because we look at it from only one perspective, ours.
now try to look at some of those anagram sequences from another perspective, like being scared, or angry, or sad, or victimized, or ... well, you get
the picture, maybe moods themselves have some level of input into it ....
maybe it started long ago in some garden....
nude [reversed] edun
how different is the pronunciation of eden
and, yes .... there is a truth in those two words...
reportedly, they were nude
in the garden of edun
according to some book that has been floating around for some time.
also, it is an accepted fact that the ancients used codes to keep knowledge from their commoners, or move information safely without letting their
enemies know what is being said.
like the atbash cypher
, an ancient way of coding which is known to exist in some words of the bible.
uh oh! are we almost having a "civil" discussion here?
and thanks for sharing,
[edit on 31-5-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]