i am thinking in this , and i ahve noticed a question:
if we are debating the possible theory that "Nessy" can be a basilisk, we must assuming too that a basilisk have a "stoning eye gaze"!,
so,,,don't you think if "he" his that we must had discovered "stoned animals"!? nobody never had related nothing, in the lake shoore there are
not a colection of "animal statues"!
neither the bottom of the lake have "fish statues" or something like that.
dont you think this is a good question? petrifing eye gaze is the primal characteristic of a basilisk, its because of that we dont call it a lizard
or something....i think.