Since the chemtrail debate (or argument) seems to have picked up, I thought I would share a study conducted on aircraft contrails and discuss the
results of this study.
Firstly, a link to the study (pdf):
The article makes for good reading and explains how and why contrails form.
What I'd like to concentrate on though, is this graph:
Two contrail cases are presented here: one contrail generated by the 757 aircraft on 7 may 1996 and one generated by the DC-8 itself on 12 May
1996. Both contrails were visible to the human eye. The 757 contrail was sampled about 22km behind the aircraft, and no natural cirrus was present in
the immediate environment.
To keep it simple I'll concentrate on the 757's figures due to the fact that it is a commonly used passenger jet, and has been spotted numerous
times as a "chemtrail plane".
5.2% of the sample consisted of soot particles.
fairly obvious as to why soot was found coming out a jet engine.
Metals found consisted of Iron, Chromium and Titanium and made up 12% of the samples collected.
All three of these metals can be found in components of aircraft engines, so again, nothing out of the ordinary.
As the above graph states, the mix indicates sulfur was found amongst the three metal particles.
Sulfur is used in jet fuels to help with lubricity, as a side note, many groups are pushing for fuels which contain little to no sulfur in them due to
Many of the unidentified volatile particles contained carbon peaks with areas at least 2-3 times above background noise level, suggesting that
these were organic compounds.
Unidentified non-volatile particles often had small amorphous shapes, which could be soot, or large angular planar shapes, which could be
silicates (which could not be positively identified since the grids were SiO coated).
MINERALS AND MINERALS MIX
Minerals found consisted of Sodium, Aluminium Potassium and/or Iron and made up 20% of the samples collected, the mix again contains sodium in the
These minerals are all crustal in origin.
So what does all this mean?
Well it shows what should be found in a typical sample of an aircraft contrail.
There will be a few variables, such as air borne particles and the like but these figures can be used as a benchmark for other samples of contrails
and yes, chemtrails.
As this experiment shows, contrail experiments can and have been done.
Now, why can't any pro-chemtrail people do this?
I speak in particular, about the ones that make money off the chemtrail myth.
Cliff Carnicon and the like.
Photo's and videos aren't proof of anything, patents aren't proof of anything, pseudo-science isn't proof of anything and the words of charlatans
aren't proof of anything.
Someone needs to put their money where their mouth is and get up there, after all it's yours and your families lives at stake isn't it??
This poisoning HAS to stop right? That's what most of the chemtrailers say at least...
So, chemtrailers are you all bark and no bite? The above experiment is the only way to prove chemtrails exist.
It is the ONE and ONLY way to prove chemtrails exist
Make it happen!