posted on May, 26 2010 @ 07:45 PM
Look, you might see this as a defeatist attitude, but lets get down to brass tacks here. What really is the worst that could happen if we just said
screw it, take it, lets get on with it already.
I am talking about this one world government, new world order crap that has been stirring about since FDR first started talking about it publicly and
echoed by Bush, Sr. If they want the freaking world, lets give it to them. Its not like they plan to kill everyone or enslave the human race.
Look, lets say it is in fact the mission of the Bilderburg group to take control of the world through domination of the financial system. Let them
have it. The sooner they get it, the sooner we can get past it and on with life. As it stands, the road is paved with bumpy opposition and they have
to create this ever changing state of the world financial market that just depresses the hell out of most people and makes life impossible for others.
Give it to them. Let them come up with their single world currency, place in effect national officials to deciminate their desires, distribute
wealth as they see fit, collect a measure of return from every country on the planet and be able to sit back on top of their mountains of gold and
laugh at their success.
Lets Pro/Con this.
Pro: equal distribution of wealth brings third world nations up to a measure of equlity and a fair chance at a productive life
Con: wealthy nations balanced out with 3rd world nations, bringing their status and quality of life in line with what many consider an inferior
Pro: centralized world government puts limitations on global conflict through the use of a globalized judiciary
Con: centralized world government's potential abuse of power to rule the planet in a martial state, versus limited freedom state
Pro: unity of science and discovery among various nation states can lead to much faster and broader leaps in scientific advancement
Con: I really dont see a Con to shared discovery advances
Pro: shared medical research without the controversy over who owns this/that can lead to extreme solutions
Con: truly productive medical advances lead to longer, healthier lives which leads to population concerns
Pro: centralized government means fewer controversies within nation states, as they are now only figureheads, reciting the directives of the global
Con: directing every nation on Earth will lead to streamlining in areas that will not be favorable to long term productivity and happiness, as well as
oversite of the smaller nations that may suffer in the short term from lack of leadership
I could keep going, but you see where this message is leading.
Personally, I am just tired of the Ups and Downs and Fearmongering Doom/Gloom that goes on every time someone sneezes. Get it on with and make it a
publicly done issue and let everyone just get used to it and get on with their lives.
Currently, we are living like we are free in a nation that has stealthily removed almost every single freedom once promised. Why keep disguising it
as "weez from da guv'ment, weez he'a ta hep".
I am sure more will be against than for this and plenty will say that I have just given up the fight. No, there is no fight. There is US v THEM in a
showdown where we are bringing a stick to a nuke fight. Rather than continue to suffer in relative silence for years and generations, just move on to
the next phase.
The alternative is less pleasant and leaves us all at odds with one another.