It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mikelee
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Its the title of the story from the source as yourself and the moron who starred your reply obviously missed.
[edit on 6/5/2010 by mikelee]
Originally posted by ThaLoccster
Just to clarify, for weedwhacker and 767doctor...
Would it be possible to do what the planes on 9/11 did by remote control, just not viably do a "e-hijacking" of a plane remotely?
Originally posted by ThaLoccster
reply to post by 767doctor
I have a video I believe from 1981, I'm sure its easily available on youtube. But I believe its NASA crashing a plane to test a type of fuel additive for fire suppression. I'm not sure of the type of craft.
But I believe it was taken off, flown and crashed all by remote control.
I don't know the type of craft its been awhile since I've watched the clip, I also don't know of any or what kind of modifications might have been made to the plane.
You familiar at all with what I'm referring to?
Also, with GPS capabilities of 2001 would my reference in my other post be more plausible or still on the same plane (no pun intended)?
...the antnnas(sic) for a remote control are larger and sometimes painted orange and can be seen on the undersid(sic)...
Originally posted by LaBTop
And it could be that the hijackers were all patsies, inspired by some agency acting as Al Qaida, who told them to fly the planes into their targets.
I suppose "they" took over only at the last seconds, to not alarm the patsies too early.
In New York.... the second plane performed quite an interesting spiral down hit at the South Tower.
Flight 93 could also have been taken over in the few minutes which are left out of the cockpit recordings.
Flight 77 could have been taken over also in the last seconds.
Patsies could have been ordered to fly low over the Pentagon.
Just a little dip of the stick..... in all cases.
Just leaving all other arguments to the side, would it be possible for a remote controlled 747 to do what was done on 9/11?
Could a remote 747 take off, fly the supposed flight plans from 9/11 and then crash at their respective locations?
Could a remote aircraft "injected" or "swapped" mid air ala Operation Northwoods...
...fly the supposed flight plans and then crash at their respective locations?
... you mention at least on a commercial airliner that some things are just impossible to do remotely, landing gear, flaps, anything you have to physically move a knob or lever for...
Are you familiar with how this is implemented on a drone?
I covered that, up above. The hijackers' activities are well documented, in the AAL 77 and UAL 93 DFDR. THEY (the hijackers) turned the airplanes, and selected the areas to fly towards (the DC area, in this case. Would have been the NYC area for AA 11 and UAL 175, obviously).
In New York.... the second plane performed quite an interesting spiral down hit at the South Tower.
That's a new one! Don't recall any "spiral" involving UAL 175!!
Flight 93 could also have been taken over in the few minutes which are left out of the cockpit recordings.
More unsubstantiated speculation? Show these "missing" few minutes. Where is the 'gap'?
Originally posted by mikelee
Its the title of the story from the source as yourself and the moron who starred your reply obviously missed.