It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Apps - The 21st Century Suburbs?

page: 1

log in


posted on May, 24 2010 @ 03:24 PM
The open web has always been a threat to the establishment. Information is power. So when people have too much access to information they have too much power.

What to do about the problem of the world wide web? The PTB can't take it away and can't really tame it. It's too big, too everywhere.

Why not just declare it dangerous and dirty and offer a "safer" alternative?

Added bonus: Make tons of money off of "safer" by making it aesthetically attractive and pander to elitism and fear to sell it. Just like the suburbs...

Conveniently, "safe" is more trackable. More controllable. More marketable.

Which brings us to apps. Application software. Are apps the new suburbs? The parallels are kind of creepy...

The Death of the Open Web

The Web is a teeming commercial city. It’s haphazardly planned. Its public spaces are mobbed, and signs of urban decay abound in broken links and abandoned projects. Malware and spam have turned living conditions in many quarters unsafe and unsanitary. Bullies and hucksters roam the streets. An entrenched population of rowdy, polyglot rabble seems to dominate major sites.

People who find the Web distasteful — ugly, uncivilized — have nonetheless been forced to live there: it’s the place to go for jobs, resources, services, social life, the future. But now, with the purchase of an iPhone or an iPad, there’s a way out, an orderly suburb that lets you sample the Web’s opportunities without having to mix with the riffraff. This suburb is defined by apps from the glittering App Store: neat, cute homes far from the Web city center, out in pristine Applecrest Estates. In the migration of dissenters from the “open” Web to pricey and secluded apps, we’re witnessing urban decentralization, suburbanization and the online equivalent of white flight.

The parallels between what happened to cities like Chicago, Detroit and New York in the 20th century and what’s happening on the Internet since the introduction of the App Store are striking. Like the great modern American cities, the Web was founded on equal parts opportunism and idealism. Over the years, nerds, students, creeps, outlaws, rebels, moms, fans, church mice, good-time Charlies, middle managers, senior citizens, starlets, presidents and corporate predators all made their home on the Web. In spite of a growing consensus about the dangers of Web vertigo and the importance of curation, there were surprisingly few “walled gardens” online — like the one Facebook purports to (but does not really) represent.

But a kind of virtual redlining is now under way. The Webtropolis is being stratified. Even if, like most people, you still surf the Web on a desktop or laptop, you will have noticed pay walls, invitation-only clubs, subscription programs, privacy settings and other ways of creating tiers of access. All these things make spaces feel “safe” — not only from viruses, instability, unwanted light and sound, unrequested porn, sponsored links and pop-up ads, but also from crude design, wayward and unregistered commenters and the eccentric ­voices and images that make the Web constantly surprising, challenging and enlightening.

When a wall goes up, the space you have to pay to visit must, to justify the price, be nicer than the free ones. The catchphrase for software developers is “a better experience.” Behind pay walls like the ones on Honolulu Civil Beat, the new venture by the eBay founder Pierre Omidyar, and Rupert Murdoch’s Times of London, production values surge. Cool software greets the paying lady and gentleman; they get concierge service, perks. Web stations with entrance fees are more like boutiques than bazaars.

The far more significant development, however, is that many people are on their way to quitting the open Web entirely. That’s what the 50 million or so users of the iPhone and iPad are in position to do. By choosing machines that come to life only when tricked out with apps from the App Store, users of Apple’s radical mobile devices increasingly commit themselves to a more remote and inevitably antagonistic relationship with the Web...

Suburbs have worked to divide and stratify this nation not just in geography but in economics and education.

When you designate something as "safe" then you inherently make something else seem "unsafe." When something is deemed "unsafe" then it invites criticism and attention that can often result in misconceptions, over-regulation, strict policing and ultimately abandonment.

Not unlike many inner-cities...

posted on May, 24 2010 @ 03:51 PM
I was just thinking this morning that the openness of the web as we know it today will surely not last forever. TPTB know the threat of easily accessable information, and are most certianly working hard to put an end to that. It will most likely come in small doses to set off as few alarms as possible. It is important that we continue to fight for net freedom, not matter how small the fight.

Support Anonymous


posted on May, 24 2010 @ 03:56 PM
reply to post by MysterE


I totally buy the analogy being made in the article. I view it as yet another way in which we are constantly being divided and our collective power marginalized.

ETA: still lovin' your gator duck...

[edit on 24/5/2010 by kosmicjack]

posted on May, 24 2010 @ 04:20 PM
reply to post by kosmicjack

I guess it is no coincidence that breaking the software restrictions of an iphone is called "jail breaking"


P.S. Have a HippoCrab!

new topics

top topics

log in