It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yes he has, I was just reading about his astute career. Again, this is quite troubling.
This man is in fact a hero. He's sure to have done well for himself fincially over the years, after all he practiced in Beverly Hills and won some very high profile cases.
But then again if you have people that will not follow the laws of the land then the law would be a joke and we cannot allow that either.
So it seems this may be one of those sticky areas.
And as far as the court petitioning for all of this guys financial statements, if his lawyer has them and has been compelled to give up the ghost, then why should the gubbment spend extra tax dollars to acquire what should be easy to get.
That is unless someone has something to hide.
Personally I don’t understand why someone would try to hide their financial records if they have done nothing illegal.
No doubt someone will say “IT’S NOT ANY OF THE GUBBMENTS BIZNISS”!!!
According to a judge there seems to be a valid reason.
This tyranny of corruption has not broken Fine, nor will it break the citizenry.In 1776, the citizenry faced the same problem with a king who was paying the judges and ensuring their tenure.The citizenry sent him a message, the Declaration of Independence. Two hundred and thirty-five years later, another message will be sent to the judges and the politicians who have engendered the tyranny of corruption.They will be voted out of office.Within six years, all of the Superior Court judges can be replaced.Within twelve years, all of the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court justices can be replaced.Within four years, all of the politicians who voted for Senate Bill SBx2-11 can be replaced. The citizenry will no longer tolerate the corruption of our democratic system and the “Rule of Law” by those whose moral and ethical standards place their own personal greed over their sworn oath to uphold the Constitution.
writ of mandamus (an extraordinary writ commanding an official to perform a ministerial act that the law recognizes as an absolute duty and not a matter for the official's discretion; used only when all other judicial remedies fail)
Originally posted by g146541
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Star upon ya, and I really hope you are found to be correct.
Git em tiger.
In a best case Revolution scenario, the only deaths will be a few Pencils.