1. Apollo 14 astronaut Allen Shepard played golf on the Moon. In front of a worldwide TV audience, Mission Control teased him about slicing the ball
to the right. Yet a slice is caused by uneven air flow over the ball. The Moon has no atmosphere and no air.
-They "teased". 'Nough said.
2. A camera panned upwards to catch Apollo 16's Lunar Landerlifting off the Moon. Who did the filming?
-They had TV cameras on the surface. You can see them on some of the pictures.
3. One NASA picture from Apollo 11 is looking up at Neil Armstrong about to take his giant step for mankind. The photographer must have been lying on
the planet surface. If Armstrong was the first man on the Moon, then who took the shot?
-lol, the pictures (stills) were taken by Neil of Buzz coming down. This is common knowledge.
4. The pressure inside a space suit was greater than inside a football. The astronauts should have been puffed out like the Michelin Man, but were
seen freely bending their joints.
-If they were on Earth
5. The Moon landings took place during the Cold War. Why didn't America make a signal on the moon that could be seen from earth? The PR would have
been phenomenal and it could have been easily done with magnesium flares.
6. Text from pictures in the article said that only two men walked on the Moon during the Apollo 12 mission. Yet the astronaut reflected in the visor
has no camera. Who took the shot?
-They both had cameras attached to them.
7. The flags shadow goes behind the rock so doesn't match the dark line in the foreground, which looks like a line cord. So the shadow to the lower
right of the spaceman must be the flag. Where is his shadow? And why is the flag fluttering if there is no air or wind on the moon?
-In EVERY pic I have seen, the shadows were correct. So unless I missed one...
8. How can the flag be brightly lit when its side is to the light? And where, in all of these shots, are the stars?
9. The Lander weighed 17 tons yet the astronauts feet seem to have made a bigger dent in the dust. The powerful booster rocket at the base of the
Lunar Lander was fired to slow descent to the moons service. Yet it has left no traces of blasting on the dust underneath. It should have created a
small crater, yet the booster looks like it's never been fired.
Taken from the on the surface TV camera: www.solarviews.com...
I think someone said this before but, in order to hoax something so perfectly like that, they would need more money and technology than it took to get
to the moon. So why not go to the moon?