It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Oddly shaped UFO sighting

page: 14
9
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 25 2010 @ 06:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
Also, the EXIF data confirms it's been through PS (see below as per my previous posts).

The OP has confirmed that he resized the image in Photoshop.




posted on May, 25 2010 @ 06:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by NASA is ASAN
Well, that does it. OP, get your stuff together and get the original - completely unedited - copy of the photo uploaded. Anyone asking for a copy of a photo of his windshield is wasting time and diverting energy. It's the original photo we all need, not a picture of his windshield. It's not the time of day he saw it, the direction he was traveling, the time of year, etc... (etc.. etc...), it's the God loving original photo.

That's it, that's your task. If you don't do that, well then this thread is pointless and your amazing sighting is going to be (rightfully) sh!t canned as a hoax. We all get that you're depressed and don't give a # about a lot of things or whatever, but if you truly witnessed and photographed advanced craft moments before it went inter-dimensional, well then do the right thing and get it verified. If real this is bigger than you, bigger than all of us.

All you need to do is upload the original photo. Being depressed is not an excuse, let's verify your amazing encounter or at least let us off the hook (if it's a hoax).


NASA is ASAN.....

I agree, as per my previous post & my many earlier requests to the op.

This will head in a negative direction without the original image from the phone.

I don't know what else to do at this stage.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 06:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by FOXMULDER147

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
Also, the EXIF data confirms it's been through PS (see below as per my previous posts).

The OP has confirmed that he resized the image in Photoshop.


FOXMULDER147.....

Yup.....he sure has.

So, if we don't get that image e-mailed from his phone.....

.....what next?

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 06:45 AM
link   

NASA is ASAN.....

I agree, as per my previous post & my many earlier requests to the op.

This will head in a negative direction without the original image from the phone.

I don't know what else to do at this stage.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not


There's nothing we can do but keep asking for a short period of time, then sh!t can the thread and sighting as a hoax. There's so much deflection going on in this thread, plus the fact that it's been through PS (you can only tell me it's because you wanted to resize it once, I won't believe it until the original is released) raises a whole bunch of red flags.

So he's spent hundreds of dollars on photo manipulation software, but can't get an original photo off of his phone? Ok, maybe he just pirated the software, but it's still fishy.

Anyways, I love the backstory and it's a pretty good hoax (just look at the interest so far), but until the original untouched data is up for scrutiny, I gotta go with hoax.

Even if it's actually real, there's too much BS surrounding the whole thing for me as a logical human to except it. To except it given the circumstances would be an insult to everyone's intelligence. Let's say your brain had genitals, it'd be like kicking it square in the pills from behind.

Let's put this issue to rest, TS, do the right thing and give us that data. I'll get on my e-knees and apologize.



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 06:55 AM
link   
reply to post by NASA is ASAN
 


NASA is ASAN.....

Well, let's see how the op goes tomorrow.

Maybe.....

.....he can e-mail the file directly from his phone.....

.....maybe not!

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 07:21 AM
link   
...and don't forget 14 pages in and we still don't have the phone model, just a battery number. I called hoax on page 3 and I'm only persuing this through all these other pages to be sure of my original reaction.

But yes original photo is a must. If that can't be produced anytime soon I think this should be moved to hoaxes or skunk works until the OP can provide the needed material, because it's getting some of us worked up



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 07:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by markymintBut yes original photo is a must. If that can't be produced anytime soon I think this should be moved to hoaxes or skunk works until the OP can provide the needed material, because it's getting some of us worked up


True, you can only be dinked around for so many pages before you start shaking your head. The whole idea of resizing the photo is ludicrous.

"So like, I took this amazing picture of an alien space-craft entering a worm hole, you guys want to see the picture?! Here, hold on, let me set the photo to '1999' and drop the resolution and take out as much detail as I can before I send it to you. I can't believe my phone takes photos in such a high resolution. Hey Samsung, it's only a picture of an alien space-craft entering a worm hole, I don't need to see every detail."



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 07:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
You've got to ask - what are the chances of capturing a UFO at the very instant it hits a wormhole?


Pretty slim, since wormholes are purely theoretical. The OP doesn't sound like a theoretical physicist, so even if he were the first human to directly observe one, I highly doubt he'd be qualified to identify it as such [catching a couple of episodes of Star Trek Voyager doesn't count].

Capturing a UFO on his phone is, however, entirely possible. But I don't believe that's what happened here. He's being deliberately evasive, and there are problems with the photo and the back story.

If I had experienced what he claims to have and was lucky enough to capture it on camera, I would be more than willing to send the raw photos for verification... and I'd be a lot more excited about sharing them. And I certainly would remember the details of the event [time, date, location, what I was doing]... I'd go out of my way to supply info.


[edit on 25-5-2010 by draknoir2]



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 07:56 AM
link   
reply to post by BlueFireWolf
 





So the phone comes with a crappy cord and program that takes the weird filetypes off the phone and on your computer. It lets you kind of resize them, which is what I do because they're huge; and then I print screen cause there doesn't seem to be the option to save.
So, it's a cheap $0 phone, yet it takes 200 megapixel photo's? Give me a break. Why is anyone still listening after this guy after the exif data has shown these photo's were edited in photoshop?

EDIT:

The OP has confirmed that he resized the image in Photoshop.
Oh, ok. Well, then it seems we're still waiting for the OP to figure out how to get images off a phone, which doesn't really seem like a very daunting task for someone who uses Photoshop for Gods sakes. He has been tip towing around doing this entire time, and I got real sick of it a while back. I was willing to believe these photos were real, but I really don't see how it could be so hard to to get the original images off the phone, no matter how cheap it is. There's no point in this thread even continuing until we have something real to work with.

[edit on 25/5/10 by CHA0S]

[edit on 25/5/10 by CHA0S]



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 08:06 AM
link   
i agree with much that has been said it would be nice to see this as not a hoax but we must be provided with the original unedited photos. the op said he could only get the photos onto his pc via the samsung software fair enough this process would not auto edit the photos would it?



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 08:16 AM
link   
If the OP ran the photos through photoshop to resize them, then it stands to reason he has the unresized photos on his machine.

Why not just email those?



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 08:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by elitelogic
If the OP ran the photos through photoshop to resize them, then it stands to reason he has the unresized photos on his machine.

Why not just email those?


Why not? Probably because it's harder to take a dump on all our heads if he did that.

Again TS, provide us with what we need and I will be the first to man up and e-pologize.



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 08:42 AM
link   
For whatever reason (whether depressed, confused, uncooperative) the OP seems to be unable to produce the original photo and phone model at this time. Hopefully he'll be able to be more helpful today but let me ask you something.

Can someone re-create this effect on their computer in the meantime?
I'm sure there are many talented computer graphic artists/novices on this forum, so if for nothing else: entertainment purposes, while we're on this break, can someone replicate this image......edges and all?

My feeling at this time is, the OP is either laughing at us for perpetrating this thread or........... may be deeply disturbed and I mean that in an innocent way. For all we know, he might've been part and witness to these events his whole life hence why he may be so despondent and detached to the world. That's a common behavior with some contactees/witnesses.

So....we shall see!



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 08:52 AM
link   
Just a thought experiment:

If *you* took a picture of an alien spacecraft caught during it's jump into hyperspace...

...would you "aww shucks" about the phone model? "shrug and "i dunno"" about the time, direction, location, date?

would you pull a "i can't figure these infernal cell phones out.." about getting the raw data/model # to experts?

If this picture is real, it would be world wide famous, you would be world wide famous, it would be a land mark day in human history..

Wouldn't you:

Leave no stone unturned in widely disseminating the raw photos to any and all interested agencies?

Scour the web for your exact phone model and software capabilities?

Get the EXACT lat/long as to where the photo was taken? Including all direction/wind/ weather conditions?

Or would you be like "meh, i got a hyperspace photo..oh well..oh shucks.."



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 08:59 AM
link   
i dont know the guy seems a bit stressed/depressed maybe not thinking too clearly. if you were hoaxing it would not be too hard to get your story straight before you posted .if this is fake why go to all the trouble of photoshopping the images and then not bothering to get a logical story planned?



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 09:07 AM
link   
reply to post by dashdespatch
 


reply to post by elitelogic
 



That's what makes this all the more intriguing. His behavior (in my opinion) is odd, at best.
The fact that he admits to being morbid and depressed, is an unusual trait to admit out loud.
He may be a clever hoaxer, knowing how to string the audience along or....he may be programmed. (Well hell, we are ALL programmed but with him, I mean....recently tweaked).

Although it's hard to discern mannerism via the internet, my impression of OP is, he's way too nonchalant and that brings me back to my two opinions of him. Either a real cool cyber hoaxer or...a disturbed individual looking for help.
Could go either way. Man, telepathy sure would come on handy right about now, huh?



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 09:12 AM
link   
so a hoaxer either way?



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 09:30 AM
link   
reply to post by dashdespatch
 


Not sure who you're directing that to or why you're saying that but, of course not. How can you be a hoaxer either way? It's like calling someone a liar, either way.
Hoaxer is purposeful and cognitive (as is a liar)
Programmed/conditioned/brainwashed is unintentional and unknowing.

There's still room for #3 too come to think of it where: OP is deeply disturbed too (without outside intervention/programming) with psychopathic/sociopath behavior where he knows what he's doing, believes what he's saying (doesn't mean to lie) and.....doesn't give a crap.


I think those are the three categories he can fall in at this time.



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 09:33 AM
link   
OP,

To establish some credibility. Can you take two photos with your Canon still camera and post them in this thread.

Photo 1: A picture of your cell phone with the first picture of the object that you took visible in the screen.

Photo 2: A picture of your cell phone with the second picture of the object that you took visible in the screen.

This will add validity to your sighting and maybe some members have the same phone as you and can offer suggestions on how to get the image files directly from your phone in a .jpg or .img format for you to upload.

Thanks,
M



posted on May, 25 2010 @ 09:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by dashdespatch
i dont know the guy seems a bit stressed/depressed maybe not thinking too clearly. if you were hoaxing it would not be too hard to get your story straight before you posted .if this is fake why go to all the trouble of photoshopping the images and then not bothering to get a logical story planned?



ATS has a much much higher standard for this stuff and has incredible analysts and researchers, than probably anywhere else online. I dont think new member realize this. Thus the reason there have been numerous people trying to hoax here. Most if not all get found out. Most people set out to hoax know they can get away with very little. But not here at ATS.

Again, not saying the OP is hoaxing. Just giving a bit of clarification.



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join