reply to post by kalenga
Well, I dont think the lawyer will get
far trying to challenge the stop & search. The American requirement for "probable cause" is much stricter than the British "reasonable suspicion".
The police can just say they suspected some kind of illegal business transaction, because it was late & in the middle of nowhere.
I'd concentrate on the fact that the law against offensive weapons was not intended to prevent a person innocently carrying fishing gear in the boot
of a car, just as it wasn't intended to stop an athelete driving to their club transporting a javelin. I'd find out what the lawyer thinks about
going to the media before doing so: if the case is as simple as it sounds & your son hasn't got previous, it may get dropped before trial anyway. Too
much attention might not be such a good thing...
I think this is going to hinge on the fishing gear being obviously just that & some evidence that they really were just sky-watching, because I'd
expect the prosecution to try to insinuate that something illegal was going down, just that the police didn't discover what.