posted on May, 24 2010 @ 01:03 AM
If this attempt of the subject of this thread does not work at all next week as it is hoped for, then I am of the opinion that instead of the "just
one" new drilling attempt that is now being done to hopefully seal this leak which may occur in maybe two months from today ( or who knows when ),
then there should be more than "just this one" new drilling attempt being done. For example if there were four new drillings attempts being done
now all at the same time for entering the leak to seal it at different entrance elevation depth levels, then if three of these new drilling attempts
should fail then the fourth attempt would be a good backup that may not fail. The three months total expected time that is required to wait for a
completely new drilling sealing attempt is much too long a period of time to wait for another trial sealing attempt, if a new drilling sealing attempt
does not work. Why have "just only one" new drilling attempt, when you could have four or five or six or more new drilling attempts all at the same
time and then not have to wait totally any longer than just three months for all of these many new and different attempts combined ?
Another reason that Iran may not have been permitted to help out, is that Iran may report something much different and untruthful about this problem
than what the news says. If Iran wants to help out and if Iran has some good ideas of ways to help that are not being tried, then Iran could publish
and communicate these ideas in many ways.