The current theory
of Earth’s moon:
At the time Earth formed 4.5 billion years ago, other smaller planetary bodies were also growing. One of these hit earth late in Earth's growth
process, blowing out rocky debris. A fraction of that debris went into orbit around the Earth and aggregated into the moon.
Let us look at some facts here
. Before we get into moons, first we
must understand planets.
What happens when we model a bunch of dust and debris in space?
Gas-rich planets such as Jupiter and Saturn grew from a disk of dust and gas which eventually crumpled like a piece of paper under its own
gravitational instability -- or so one theory goes.
Now a computer simulation suggests that this idea falls apart under the turbulent forces within early protoplanetary systems.
The old, favored theory relies on the protoplanetary dust disk becoming denser and thinner until it reaches a tipping point, where it becomes
gravitationally unstable and collapses into kilometer-sized building blocks that form the basis for gas giants. But 3D modeling has shown for the
first time that turbulence prevents the dust from settling into the dense disk necessary for gravitational instability to work
on planet formation theory.
Six exoplanets out of twenty-seven were found to be orbiting in the opposite direction to the rotation of their host star — the exact reverse of
what is seen in our own Solar System. The team announced the discovery of nine new planets orbiting other stars, and combined their results with
earlier observations. Besides the surprising abundance of retrograde orbits, the astronomers also found that more than half of all the so-called "hot
Jupiters" in their survey have orbits that are misaligned with the rotation axis of their parent stars.
Hot Jupiters are planets orbiting other stars that have masses similar to or greater than Jupiter, but which orbit their parent stars much more
Planets are thought to form in the disc of gas and dust encircling a young star, and since this proto-planetary disc rotates in the same direction as
the star itself, it was expected that planets that form from the disc would all orbit in more or less the same plane, and that they would move along
their orbits in the same direction as the star’s rotation.
Further, space.com notes
…Like many alien worlds found after it, 51 Pegasi B was a "hot Jupiter," a gas giant as close or closer to its star than Mercury is to our
sun, unlike "cold Jupiters" that orbit farther away such as Saturn or, naturally, Jupiter.
Of the 429 exoplanets discovered to date, 89 have been hot Jupiters, likely because their large size and proximity to their stars makes them easier to
spot by current techniques.
It is impossible that planets form out of dusty pro-planetary disks for a number of obvious reasons, so let’s go through them.
1. Dust in space does not aggregate into solid bodies; it disburses if it is not ionized.
2. Dust that is ionized acts as a dusty plasma, giving us ring systems such as Saturn's that do not devolve into planets or moons.
3. Of the exoplanets that we can observe around other stars, we find many of them to be orbiting far too close to their star for "proto-disk"
theory to account for them. All the dust should have been sucked up in the formation of a star leaving nothing left to create the gas giant.
4. As the article points out, we find planets in retrograde orbits and off axis, a totally unexpected phenomena in "proto-disk" theory.
5. We have an asteroid belt - where did this come from if asteroids supposedly aggregate into planets?
6. Oort cloud? How come those pesky comets decided not to aggregate into planets? Were they just being rebellious?
7. The "roving planet" theory is a flaming joke using Einsteinian gravity only as an explanation. While it is clear that the planets did not
magically form in their present locations, it’s also clear that they didn't form elsewhere from proto-disks and magically migrate to their present
locations due to gravity. Since planets can't form from proto-disks, they obviously can't migrate from there to their present locations.
I'll get back to the moon in a minute, but first we need to understand how these gas giants can be observed orbiting so closely to their parent
There is one blatantly obvious solution to this problem that even a 10 year old can see.
-Gas giants are born from stars; they are electrically ejected from stars.
This resolves all manner of problems dealing with where gas giant planets come from and is totally consistent with everything we observe about them.
Of course, such a simple solution poses several problems for the criminal looters you call state funded cosmologists. Their precious BS theory of
stars would need to be drastically revised. Such a theory would also create all manner of problems dealing with big bang models due element abundance
issues (which they already have problems with, but I digress.) However, I have faith they could make the ejection theory work within the mainstream
context. I’ll bet they could come up with a way to make a standard theory star squirt out a gas giant, yet still conform to Einstein’s retarded
However, such a theory obviously leads to the next step - where moons and solid body planets come from.
If one were to accept that gas giants were ejected from stars, the obvious next step is that solid body planets are ejected from gas giants (brown
dwarf stars.) This is simply too much for the standard theory to deal with. Physicists would have to accept that element creation in brown dwarfs is
only possible with an electric model of stars. An electric model of stars is only possible in an electric universe. That element abundance for big
bang models is totally wrong.
You want to know where the Earth’s oceans came from? They came from Saturn. That’s right. Saturn was the brown dwarf star that ejected the
Earth, and it was within the plasma coma of Saturn that the Earth received its water.
Brown dwarf stars spectra
is a freaking ocean of water. In an electric model of stars,
gas giants that are placed outside the influence of the Sun’s heliosphere will light up in a glow discharge (a brown dwarf star). At one point
Saturn was located outside of our Sun’s influence and was glowing just like the other brown dwarfs we see in space.
It was within this cool diffuse plasma coma of Saturn that Earth acquired its oceans.
Our moon most likely either came from Saturn or Jupiter as Saturn swung into our solar system. The planetary orbits we see today are not a product of
gravity; they are a product of charged bodies being aligned with the electrical field of the Sun. Planets do not collide; they electrically interact
with each other until stability of orbits is achieved.
It is only with in this context that a rational explanation of Earth’s moon and oceans can be achieved. All other theories of proto-disks,
accumulation models, cometary bombardment, etc.. etc.. etc.. have been clearly disproven by the known laws of physics and our observations of
There is only one theory that meets all observations without violating any laws of physics and agrees with all our observations.
Planets are born – just like everything else in this universe.
If you would like to review a full working theory of the Earth's history from this perspective, look
More articles in favor of this theory of Earth's history:
More articles detailing electric cosmology:
Technical journal articles on electric stars:
A technical article detailing a massive list of Einstein's failures:
[edit on 21-5-2010 by mnemeth1]