"Source A revealed!" : Secret UN meetings on disclosure, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 68 times


reply posted on 21-5-2010 @ 12:20 PM by Mr Lurker
reply to post by Mr Mask



Ha, well ive always considered myself a member ive been on here so long reading at least every post making it to front page every day. ATS, is my homepage, and ive made it defualt home page on every PC ive built for customers for many years

Anyway, i really want to know the widespread implications of this. These guys have countless hours on radio, tv, podcasts, conventions and project camelot directly quoting this "Source A" skip to 4:50ish of the conversation.

I feel embarrased for Mr. Theilmann, i could only imagine what hes thinking/going through. To those thinking exposing his life's skeletons is too harsh, lol all i can say is, they started it. Humility is part of our life's learning exeriance and this is his reward for a job well done lol.

I cant wait to hear what their "Source B" info has in store for us!

[edit on 21-5-2010 by Mr Lurker]



reply posted on 21-5-2010 @ 01:48 PM by Mr Mask
Originally posted by EvolvedMinistry
As exciting as this may sound, I REALLY don't think that there is going to be disclosure anytime soon, or even...ever.



Let it go. Just...let it go.


Annnnnnnnd anothet person who has just skimmed the title (and then moved along to the post button) shows up.

Um...so you know, this thread and the information presented in the OP is all about breaking news on showing that a "disclosure promising fraud" was caught red-handed being a fake.

THIS THREAD IS NOT PRO-DISCLOSURE or even "anti-disclosure".

It is recently breaking information that resulted from a private investigation on a source that claimed to be "someone he wasn't".

I really do not understand when someone is "too busy" to read something, but seems to have enough time to share his two cents in a written reply.

It just shows that you do not take information serious enough to actually "look at it" before you speak about it.

I mean, the artical in the OP is topnotch! You should go read it. It is an epic tale that sweeps across the sceen with everything from dominatrix-male-slaves to fake-alien-claims!

And it ends with a step-by-step butt-kicking for a "criminal" who lied to everyone from the start.


But thanks for not reading it...it gave me a chance to bump this thread once again.

I really want a lot of "open minded folks" to get a good eye-full of this.

It may save their lives one day...or at least their wallets.




[edit on 21-5-2010 by Mr Mask]


reply posted on 21-5-2010 @ 01:55 PM by Son of Will
Originally posted by Beamish
With reference to Unity_99’s classic reply in this thread:

reply to
post by DoomsdayRex



reply to post by Mr Mask



reply to post by Chadwickus



and to the inimitable IsaacKoi for bringing this to our attention. And to quote our pet barrister:

There seem to be plenty of people within the UFO communit that are prepared to pay for books/conferences/seminars/DVD etc etc etc by hoaxers (not to mention inflating egos by listening to such people regardless of their failure to provide any supporting evidence for their claims)


Our Unity_99 is the epitome of the target audience such hoaxes are aimed at, ie., unquestioning believers.

Make even the most extravagant claims about UFOs in a serious and seemingly covert way, add evocative organizations and clandestine meetings and bingo, the gullible will flood to your support.



Wow, how many people are going to claim mental superiority over another ATS member? This is a bit distasteful. I can recall multiple embarrassing comments made by literally every member who has felt it necessary to showcase the embarrassing paragraph left by Unity_99. It's not exactly hypocritical, but it's quite offensive and completely uncalled for. Making a reasonable point, and attacking someone in the same sentence, is probably the worst way to get that point across.

[edit on 21-5-2010 by Son of Will]



reply posted on 21-5-2010 @ 02:03 PM by Mr Lurker
reply to post by Mr Mask



I know Mr Mask, what is going on? This should be talked about to death right now, i joined purely to discuss the wide spread implications of the original article.

I seriously took the day off to talk about this and even came outta a 5-6 year lurking craze and created an account just to post and discuss. I want to know who else has been using this Source A. Its referenced all over in many threads on OMF.

Im an avid listener and collector of the disclosure project information and they all seem to have a "Source". Its only clay and Shawn Pickering that ive really heard the term "Source A". But ive heard countless other refer to sources, like wilcock, greer, well the list goes on, its all of them.

I want a list of all these guys who have used this Source A for information. Source B is gonna have big shoes to fill now lol.


reply posted on 21-5-2010 @ 02:10 PM by Mr Mask
Originally posted by Mr Lurker
reply to
post by Mr Mask



I know Mr Mask, what is going on? This should be talked about to death right now, i joined purely to discuss the wide spread implications of the original article.


Hence why I keep bumping it. Ha!


I seriously took the day off to talk about this and even came outta a 5-6 year lurking craze and created an account just to post and discuss. I want to know who else has been using this Source A. Its referenced all over in many threads on OMF.

I joined to tell people to roll their own ciggeretts...

Somehow, your reason seems way more important then mine.

Oh, and I also was a lurker for a long time...I know how hard it is to join, so I applaud you (unlike moderator applauds, mine are worth nothing).


I want a list of all these guys who have used this Source A for information. Source B is gonna have big shoes to fill now lol.


Very good question there...I have only heard Pickering use the "Source A" title, but as you said, all of them have a "source".

I'm with you! I'd like to know how far this worm has worked his way into the bad-apple that is the "mini-celebrity disclosure circle" of the internet.

But, lets face it, if anyone else was using this guy before this...they will not be admitting to it any time soon.




[edit on 21-5-2010 by Mr Mask]


reply posted on 21-5-2010 @ 02:19 PM by Mr Mask
reply to post by rdube02



So you were involved eh?

Cyber-high-5 for you my friend!

OMG, if you dent that Greer jerk, I'll donate 50 bucks to your cause.

Really, good to know there are people working on this stuff. I'm a fan!

I always wonder why people do not get the police involved. These people are a danger to our nation's sanity, and as far as I am concerned what they are doing is criminal.

Thanks for whatever role you played in all this, and tell the team I love them.

Give them a kiss to...

Come on...you can do it.


reply posted on 21-5-2010 @ 02:40 PM by stealthyaroura
reply to post by Mr Mask



I will say one thing MR MASK i'm totally in agreement with you about site's like skam a lot and the complete fraudsters on there. (not all)

i have never read so much nonsense as in that forum.and as for wilcock and the rest like him i know they have there followers but they are either in it for the money or they have sad lives and love the attention as they would be insignificant people otherwise.

only time i go on there is for a good laugh at the sad fools,it makes me feel normal and superior LOL

Back on track,Im glad this source " A" has been outed as a hoax even if i never read his claims.(dont think so anyway)
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Curiosity rover has photographed a new UFO
  Posted 13 days ago with 10 member flags
Criticism of Israel now a crime in California.
  Posted 2 days ago with 9 member flags
The power of greed can make you misspell even your own name...
  Posted 11 days ago with 7 member flags
Research into the Prophecies & Predictions of Billy Meier
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags
Sky Portal Appears Over Arctic Facility
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags
Strange Wormhole Portal Appears Over Arctic Facility?
  Posted 4 days ago with 2 member flags
The nuclear attack on the moon-did it REALLY happen?
  Posted 3 days ago with 2 member flags