It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Millions of Americans arrested for but not convicted of crimes will likely have their DNA forcibly extracted and added to a national database, according to a bill approved by the U.S. House of Representatives on Tuesday.
By a 357 to 32 vote, the House approved legislation that will pay state governments to require DNA samples, which could mean drawing blood with a needle, from adults "arrested for" certain serious crimes. Not one Democrat voted against the database measure, which would hand out about $75 million to states that agree to make such testing mandatory.
"We should allow law
They arent talking about arresting people for a dui and taking blood samples, they are more than likely talking about asasault and other highly aggressive offenses.
AND if you are arrested falsely... its something you can sue the nation for... and you will make a lot of money... so this is a win win for you if you are innocent.
Originally posted by rjmelter
being a criminal justice major myself, I do not see a problem with this.
Violent offenders tend to get worse until they actually kill somebody. I was interning at a local sheriffs department and there have been people in that jail atleast 18 times... 18 times! and their offenses got progressively worse or just repeated the same offenses. Getting one blood sample may actually solve more crimes that haven't been caught yet.
They arent talking about arresting people for a dui and taking blood samples, they are more than likely talking about asasault and other highly aggressive offenses. AND if you are arrested falsely... its something you can sue the nation for... and you will make a lot of money... so this is a win win for you if you are innocent.
Maybe it's a win/win for you, but I doubt it will be considered one for the innocent person. Could you provide some links to stories about people who have been falsely arrested and have made a lot of money off of it ? You can't sue the nation for false arrest, unless you are arrested by the nation. Most people are arrested by their local police department for cases like assualt, etc.
Originally posted by TarzanBeta
Firstly, the article does not specify "violent offenders". As well, how can you say, "they are more than likely talking about assault..."?
I'm pretty sure they're making it clear that it will be everyone who is arrested who gets a needle stuck in them.
Wonderful.
Originally posted by exlibertateveritas
reply to post by rjmelter
I would agree with you if it was convicted a serious felony, but this is just being arrested. They could just go an arrest anyone, take their dna, then decide they had the wrong person and let them go. However, you dna, which should be considered both life and property, has already be taken from you, most likely against your will. This is another bad bill passed by the bozos.
By a 357 to 32 vote, the House approved legislation that will pay state governments to require DNA samples, which could mean drawing blood with a needle, from adults "arrested for" certain serious crimes. Not one Democrat voted against the database measure, which would hand out about $75 million to states that agree to make such testing mandatory.
Originally posted by Raustin
Let's say that my neighbor gets shot. The police come and see me standing over the body, trying to offer assistance. I would probably be arrested as I am generally carrying a pistol, even though I would also probably be released in a matter of hours. In this little scenario I would then be forced to submit a DNA sample. I don't want to do that, and find it very sad that an above poster said if you have nothing to hide, you shouldn't be scared. The fact that above poster is pursuing a CJ degree is also rather worrisome.