Peruvian Air Force pilot shoots at UFO. , page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 96 times


reply posted on 20-5-2010 @ 03:10 PM by karl 12
Originally posted by Unknown Origin
One aspect of this report makes me think it's bogus that is the part where the pilot was ordered to fire on the object.



There's another incident
here where a pilot was ordered to open fire on an unidentified object - the documents in this report are worth a read as well.




Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Or the gun-camera footage. If he was within 300 feet of the object, the gun camera footage would conceivably be among the best of the UFO ever captured.



That is a good question -maybe the CIA and NSA were asking (or could answer) the same question whilst compiling reports about a subject they pretend to have no interest in.


reply posted on 20-5-2010 @ 03:26 PM by 12voltz
reply to post by cavscout11cav



The su-22 is the export version of the su-17 "fitter" which has a service ceiling of 59,050 ft so its possible to attain the claimed height of 63,000 as he was low on fuel(less weight)and also used up ammunition ,again less weight .Remember he is chasing a ufo so some discrepancies in altitude could be attributed to the fact he was excited and scared.


reply posted on 20-5-2010 @ 03:30 PM by kindred
reply to post by dragonsmusic



What you said maybe true to some extent, but we only have his word to go on, which for most people, especially the scientific minded types just isn't enough. How do you know he's not making it up. There's no evidence, just his word. Where's the cockpit video recordings of the encounter, where's the tesimonies of the other 1800 men including the commander who all saw this object? Surely they can't be too difficult to track down.

[edit on 21-5-2010 by kindred]


reply posted on 20-5-2010 @ 03:47 PM by Everwatcher33
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by yeti101
so wheres the photos, video , radio communications you know Evidence? Peru hiding it? 2 hours nobody got a telescope and took a photo? The peruvian gvt may have the best evidence ever in their possesion.


Or the gun-camera footage. If he was within 300 feet of the object, the gun camera footage would conceivably be among the best of the UFO ever captured.


You know if people had the evidence (if it's real) and wanted to release it it would already be known to us. Coming to a post about someone's account of what happened and asking where is the footage, photos, radio comms...is almost like asking that we make some footage of what his brain saw. The guy had a story and Karl was kind enough to post what the guys story was. If you believe it fantastic, if not great too...but to all the people asking for evidence stop and take it for what it is...a guy telling people of an experience that happened to him.

Doesn't mean it's true, but if you are coming to these forums for proof of UFO's you're probably in the wrong place. Sorry if it seems like the post is just aimed at you two, but it's aimed at a lot of people who straight up ask for proof. If the thread was about proof we would be hitting national news not the ATS forums... It's a story/account like most things in this forum.

Edit: Also thanks Karl I like reading your posts, you provide interesting reading material while I'm at work.

[edit on 5/20/2010 by Everwatcher33]


reply posted on 20-5-2010 @ 05:01 PM by Shadowfoot
reply to post by Skellon



You beat me to it. It does seem silly to believe that the performance numbers found through civillian channels ie the internet etc.. on military craft and weaponry would be anything other than a number impressive enough to propogandize the ignorant masses. Of course the ceiling on the s22 is greater than that reported.

I mean why spend billions in top secret development to turn around and tell your potential enemies your hardwares capacities.


reply posted on 20-5-2010 @ 05:03 PM by manta78
reply to post by Everwatcher33



Quote:

"Doesn't mean it's true, but if you are coming to these forums for proof of UFO's you're probably in the wrong place. Sorry if it seems like the post is just aimed at you two, but it's aimed at a lot of people who straight up ask for proof. If the thread was about proof we would be hitting national news not the ATS forums... It's a story/account like most things in this forum."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Actually if I was a retired military person, government official, or even
an EBE, with something to disclose, I would probably disclose it here "first" before it either was ignored or laughed at by the MSM; knowing that at the very least, it would be paid attention to by persons who
are genuinely interested in these topics.... and even if it was only done as a "test" to determine reactions to same, before hitting the MSM.



[edit on 20-5-2010 by manta78]


reply posted on 20-5-2010 @ 05:21 PM by bagari
reply to post by Shadowfoot



You and Skellon are exactly right. Specifications for military aircraft are always grossly underestimated. Why would you want your enemy to know exactly what your aircraft can do? For example, about the only published information that is exactly right regarding the aircraft type that I flew on for 20 years is the number of crew members. In addition, the aircraft manufacturers lay out self-imposed limitations which equal about 80% of the aircraft's true capability (to prolong component life) which can be exceeded if deemed necessary.


reply posted on 20-5-2010 @ 05:47 PM by NoFilter2323
reply to post by Everwatcher33



Great response, I like the way you think!

I am all for that kind of mentality, when it comes to dissecting stories like this. I mean how many posters, requesting for more evidence, Photos....etc... does it take to get that point across. I am down for skeptical thinking but, no need to over emphasis the point. He was just presenting this pilots case and letting everyone check it out for themselves, don't expect to come in here and find the holy grail of UFO evidence!

But, this story and many more like it are very interesting, but you truly don't know the validity of this man. None the less, i think it sounds legit, as far as I am concerned... But, then again who knows what the agenda the governments of the world are pushing....


reply posted on 20-5-2010 @ 05:47 PM by karl 12
reply to post by SLAYER69



Slayer, thanks for posting that one mate -it's certainly an interesting watch and they go into quite some detail about the object's flight characteristics and government documents.


Incident 1:28





Government documents 1:19



Cheers.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



UFO Filmed From Avebury Crop Circle, UK With Multiple Witnesses
  Posted 19 days ago with 89 member flags
The Men In Black(OPs) The Aviary & UFOs
  Posted 12 days ago with 83 member flags
Did a RAF Tornado crash during a UFO intercept mission in 1997?
  Posted 14 days ago with 39 member flags
What is this comming out of our star?
  Posted 9 days ago with 33 member flags
Huge Unknown Objects orbiting the Sun for months...?
  Posted 8 days ago with 29 member flags
The CIA and the UFO Mythos
  Posted 16 days ago with 26 member flags
UFO Reporting for the 21st Century!
  Posted 12 days ago with 26 member flags