It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, (When men had become a larger population, capable of sustaining itself, and far to large to allow to live for hundreds of years like Genesis states earlier)
2That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.(E.T. breeders are sent down to father a new type of humans. These individuals would this time have LESS E.T. DNA in them. They had put too much in and it was causing us to live for 500-900 years as Genesis 5 clearly states.
3And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. (Now that the E.T. breeders had fathered children with less E.T. Genes, their life expectancy would fall to 120 years without the stronger mix from first experiments)
4There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. (NOW THIS IS WHERE IT GETS ODD. WE GO FROM ANGELS (E.T.) sleeping with our human daughters, to God seeing man as wicked? Now how has God made this decision? Shouldn't he find his own "Sons" as the bible calls them to be Wicked? For mingle with his Creation? Why would he let the angels mate with Humans? Answer: He wouldn't.
5And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
7And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them (With so much E.T. Genes) .
8But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD. (He had the lowest E.T. Genes)
9These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations (Perfect in his generations...I read the translation for the word generations can also mean Genealogy...To me this reads as...NOAH was JUST A man and perfect in his Genealogy(Genes)...meaning he had the lowest percentage of E.T. genes of all peoples) , and Noah walked with God. ((He was perfect in his Genes, and just a man...yet he walked with the E.T....to understand why they were doing what they were doing...AKA Flooding the Earth as a reboot in terms on the Human DNA...no longer could we live so long like those in Genesis 5.
Originally posted by Loken68
reply to post by ElijahWan
Listen friend, I saw Star Trek 1st contact too and it didn't happen that way. ((Never saw it...All these thoughts are self-considered...Based on Logic...Not faith.))
Noah and his family were saved just as Lot and his family would be later. Again in Sodom the same thing was going on as in Noah's day and that's unnatural moral behavior. ((And again God couldn't find a single other person as morally/spiritually enlightened as Lot was? Doubful. Again why is our God favoring single specific individuals? Isn't that ungodly?))
Also I think you can agree that if God were mad at the World...He would just kill everyone...and restart...But what kinda God KILLS?...Loving.... my butt...If I lived during Noah's time and was who I am now...I'd think I'd be more entitled to Noah's deal than Noah was...But no...My innocent "Good moraled" butt would be sitting under 5000ft of Water...Ya again...Not logical.
We now are at the appointed time. Who will you believe? Jesus or ET?
What appointed time. Your god specifically states he won't ever do the same thing.
Genesis 8:20-21 (New International Version) 20 Then Noah built an altar to the LORD and, taking some of all the clean animals and clean birds, he sacrificed burnt offerings on it. 21 The LORD smelled the pleasing aroma and said in his heart: "Never again will I curse the ground because of man, even though [a] every inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
So god saves Lot and Noah... 2 Peter 2:7-8
[God] rescued Lot, a righteous man in anguish over the debauched lifestyle of lawless men, (for while he lived among them day after day, that righteous man was tormented in his righteous soul by the lawless deeds he saw and heard )
So here's a question...Will God spare me because I'm a modern righteous man? Or do I had to believe the entire bible to get passage?
Originally posted by ElijahWan
So Genesis has it that God creates animals first on the Earth, THEN he creates the Human. Human's are created in god's image yet we share 99% of our DNA with Chimps. Is god 99% a Chimp then? There's only so far I can stretch my faith...And this is coming from a 19 year old, baptized, and confirmed Catholic. One who was taught Catholicism from the age of 5 till I renounced my faith at the age of 16. I understand the Catholic viewpoint....I have the same...I'm scared for the end times and I wanna be with my creator if they (the end times) come. (which God says he'll never do again btw). So we try our HARDEST to believe what the bible says...But is there any FACTUAL evidence that supports a God creating man? No there isn't. Is there evidence to suggest that the missing link could be as simple as and E.T. Gene splice? Yes there is. I'm not posting this topic up to have an argument on religion, or faith, or anything like that. My argument is based on pure and sounds LOGIC.
Originally posted by ElijahWan
reply to post by Loken68
Never again will I curse the ground because of man, even though [a] every inclination of his heart is evil from childhood. And never again will I destroy all living creatures, as I have done.
Curse the ground....Putting fire on it...Is cursing it....In that sentence...God is saying he won't kill destroy humans again in a by "Cursing the ground, because of man" Now must would interpret this as. He won't do something like Revelations because of MAN, even though every inclination of our hearts are evil from childhood.
Adam lived 930 years
Seth lived 912 years
Enos lived 905 years
Cainan lived 910 years
Mahalaleel lived 895 years
Jared lived 962 years
Methuselah lived 969 years
Lamech lived 777 years
Originally posted by ElijahWan
yet we share 99% of our DNA with Chimps. Is god 99% a Chimp
Apart from the fusion of chromosome 2, visible differences between chimp and human chromosomes are few and tiny. In thirteen chromosomes no visible differences of any kind exist. If you select at random any “paragraph” in the chimp genome and compare it with the comparable “paragraph” in the human genome, you will find very few “letters” are different: on average, less than two in every hundred. We are, to a ninety-eight per cent approximation, chimpanzees, and they are, with ninety-eight per cent confidence limits, human beings. If that does not dent your self-esteem, consider that chimpanzees are only ninety-seven per cent gorillas; and humans are also ninety-seven per cent gorillas. In other words we are more chimpanzee-like than gorillas are.’4
The two species are only 95% identical when insertions and deletions are considered,8 showing that the estimate of divergence depends mainly on what type of DNA is being compared. A number of differences between humans and chimps were named that are difficult to quantify in an estimate of sequence divergence (that is, the differences in bases between the human and chimp genomes), including shorter telomeres in humans, a 10% larger chimp genome, and great differences in chromosomes 4, 9, 12 and the Y chromosome, for example.
We also share about 50% of our DNA with bananas and that doesn’t make us half bananas, either from the waist up or the waist down.’24 Evidence has certainly emerged that ‘DNA is not everything’; for example, mitochondria, ribosomes, the endoplasmic reticulum and the cytosol are passed unchanged from parent to offspring (save for possible mutations in mtDNA). In fact, gene expression is itself under the control of the cell.25 Some animals have undergone extremely dramatic genetic changes, and yet their phenotype has remained virtually identical.26 Such epigenetic marks ‘can dramatically affect the health and characteristics of an organism—some are even passed from parent to child—yet they do not alter the underlying DNA sequence.’27 This evidence lends great support to reproduction after kinds (Genesis 1:24–25; 1 Corinthians 15:39), as structures present within parents are preserved in their offspring.