It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
“I am not a huge, but I am a substantial, skeptic of human spaceflight,” Rockefeller told Armstrong, Cernan, and Norman R. Augustine, the chairman of the Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee.
“We’re approximately the same generation, but that’s where I am,” Rockefeller said. “I cannot support going into space as an end in and of itself. I agree with the president that we need a measured, nationally, globally relevant and sustainable human space flight program--not one solely bound by place and time in space.”
Originally posted by dethduck
When asked why he climbed Mt. Everest. Sir Edmund Hillary replied,
"Because it was there."
Screw you Mr. Rockefeller.
By 2525, the president says that a new spacecraft will be ready for travel that can go beyond the moon. The United States will start by sending astronauts to an asteroid for the first time in history.
“By the mid-2030s, I believe we can send humans to orbit Mars and return them safely to Earth. And a landing on Mars will follow,” he said.
“We’ve been there before,” Obama said. “There’s a lot more of space to explore.”
Originally posted by Intelearthling
It's very obvious that he doesn't know that Mars is closer to Earth than the asteroids in these quotes.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Originally posted by Intelearthling
It's very obvious that he doesn't know that Mars is closer to Earth than the asteroids in these quotes.
Are you sure he doesn't mean asteroids that come close by? The thing about those buggers is that they move around vs. mars which has a steady orbit.
Originally posted by frankensence
Just to play the Devil's advocate here, can not all this be accomplished with robotic exploration? With the budget crisis America faces, and as extremely expensive as manned space flight is, I say let them fund a manned space program with a special tax. You'll see how quickly citizens in manned space flight lose interest.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Intelearthling
You have quoted a typo in your quotation. The year is 2025, not 2525. Just a point of information.
Originally posted by PsykoOpsAre you sure he doesn't mean asteroids that come close by? The thing about those buggers is that they move around vs. mars which has a steady orbit.
Landing on an asteroid and giving it a well-timed nudge "would demonstrate once and for all that we're smarter than the dinosaurs and can avoid what they didn't," said White House science adviser John Holdren.
While Apollo 11 took eight days to go to the moon and back in 1969, a typical round-trip mission to a near-Earth asteroid would last about 200 days, Crawley said. That would demand new propulsion and life-support technology. And it would be riskier. Aborting a mission in an emergency would still leave people stuck in space for several weeks.