Engineering SEXLESS Humans tommrows tek, page 2

reply to post by andy1033

---

Both. I read it a while back and wanted to post it. The thread seem to go well with it.

reply to post by Helig

---

You could as well get rid of the relationships formed between pairs, and leave the sex for the fun and the physical and mental health of the people.

Same result

Originally posted by Dynamitrios
reply to post by Helig

---

You could as well get rid of the relationships formed between pairs, and leave the sex for the fun and the physical and mental health of the people.

Same result

What I'm saying is that without the sex the relationships would honestly be better because they wouldn't be based on things like sexual attraction and appearance. You wouldn't have pairs that split up later in life because one suddenly loses interest in sex or suddenly stricken with impotence (largely a male problem). Or better yet look at the incidents where say a woman wants children by X age, but her bf/husband/whatever isn't ready yet; she issues an ultimatum and he either capitulates or the whole relationship falls apart -- if they weren't even concerned about reproduction it would be a non-issue.

reply to post by Romantic_Rebel

---

I personally see it as one of the outcomes for our race as humans, to someday leave all this rubbish behind.

reply to post by Dynamitrios

---

I would highly disagree and suggest you read up on evolution.

It an organism accepts the genetic engineering, as in, it doesnt die, then it is acceptable. BECAUSE that mutation could of happened naturally. for example, making an apple smell like a lemon (ate one) is not evil, as it doesnt kill the apple. An apple could of naturally evolved to smell like a lemon, and vice versa. However, you couldnt make an apple say,, grow a nose. That wouldnt work and would therefore be evil.

Its not Speeding up evolution, its just testing out the possabilities, moving sideways maybe.

Originally posted by VonDoomen
reply to post by Dynamitrios

---

It an organism accepts the genetic engineering, as in, it doesnt die, then it is acceptable. BECAUSE that mutation could of happened naturally. for example, making an apple smell like a lemon (ate one) is not evil, as it doesnt kill the apple. An apple could of naturally evolved to smell like a lemon, and vice versa. However, you couldnt make an apple say,, grow a nose. That wouldnt work and would therefore be evil

You are kind of contradicting yourself. Humans are intrinsically with sex, they could not exist (or have evolved in that matter) without it. Because there is no closed transformation which would remove sexes from a cybernetic standpoint, as you say engenieering a human without sex would be evil.

Pokemon discovered in Venezuela
  Posted 14 days ago with 47 member flags

89-Year-Old Man Develops Bladeless Bird-Friendly Wind Turbine
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags

Amazing snowflake images that you have never seen before.
  Posted 14 days ago with 44 member flags

Energy Solutions THEY don\'t want you to know about
  Posted 14 days ago with 35 member flags

High speed video reveals the bizarre physics of an ordinary water droplet
  Posted 4 days ago with 32 member flags

Does this video show a working self propelled magnetic engine?
  Posted 7 days ago with 31 member flags

Viruses: alive or not?
  Posted 11 days ago with 30 member flags

NASA reveals secrets it has hidden on the Curiosity rover.
  Posted 17 days ago with 29 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: