EU nations override UK on hedge fund rules, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 18-5-2010 @ 09:40 AM by Misoir
news.yahoo.com...

European Union governments overrode British objections — and U.S. worries — by agreeing Tuesday to tighten rules for hedge funds, a move some fear will block American funds from the region and cause the lucrative industry to flee London's financial district.

The decision reflects Europe's new-found resolve to tighten oversight of financial markets and crack down on speculators with a heavier hand, though the final law may be softened as a concession to Britain's new government and its prime minister, David Cameron.

Hedge funds are lightly regulated investment vehicles that cater to rich and institutional investors. They promise high investment returns and tend to use complex trading strategies that can involve large amounts of leverage, or borrowed money.

The new EU rules would regulate managers of hedge funds, private equity, real estate and commodity funds for the first time, requiring them to register with regulators and hand over information on their trades. They will also have to set aside capital to counter risks — as banks do.

Crucially, the proposed rules don't give funds the automatic right to sell across the 27-nation bloc. U.S. Treasury chief Tim Geithner has complained that this was a "protectionist" move that could shut American funds out of the EU.

To finalize the law by July, governments must now seek a compromise between their version and one voted by the European Parliament. The result is likely to give more rights to foreign funds to do business across Europe.


Well I guess it is a good thing in the end, I still oppose them overriding the UK but atleast there will be tougher regulations.

[edit on 5/18/10 by Misoir]


reply posted on 18-5-2010 @ 09:52 AM by Misoir
reply to post by woodwardjnr



I completely agree with tough regulations, but they are overriding the UK when they decided to do these regulations. They act like the UK has no say in what happens to their own country.


reply posted on 18-5-2010 @ 09:59 AM by pieman
reply to post by Misoir



They do have a say, they can leave the EU.

I don't see any reason why the rest of Europe should have to put up with a vulnerable ecconomy so that the UK can allow white collar criminals to carry out their shady deals for the benefit of a few rich people who immediately move the cash to countries that allow them to avoid paying tax.


reply posted on 18-5-2010 @ 10:06 AM by Dermo
Originally posted by Misoir
I completely agree with tough regulations, but they are overriding the UK when they decided to do these regulations. They act like the UK has no say in what happens to their own country.


**I would like to point out that the UK are already introducing a levy on their bankers so its not like it is completely against their will**

online.wsj.com...

The thing with Pan EU decisions like this is that each country gets a vote depending on their population.. Obviously the UK was on the losing end of that vote..

And the fact also remains.. If the UK started acting more in the EU, they would get an awful lot more power.. Instead of always being the antagonists, they could shape the union..

Which I feel many UK citizens want seeing as Clegg got so many votes and one of his big policies was to move Britain closer to the rest of the EU..
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Memorial day thoughts.
  Posted 3 days ago with 11 member flags
Global governance and the challenge to the American Constitution
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags
Abraham Lincoln Filed a Patent for "Facebook\' in 1845..? (HOAX)
  Posted 19 days ago with 3 member flags
Explosive Scoop on Obama from Breitbart.com
  Posted 10 days ago with 1 member flags