It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Utopian
Firstly may i state that it is not my intention to offend anyone with this thread and if you find such philosophical discussions offensive i apologize.
The reason for creating this thread is to debate the seemingly closed mindedness of Atheism in relation to most other belief systems.
Originally posted by PowerSlave
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
Those who claim their god is just beyond our discoveries face the challenge of constantly and eternally moving the goalposts as human knowledge advances
Isn't this essentially what "science" does? Not to mention almost everything in life, even Darwins theory requires life to move its own goal posts, ie adaptation, survival.
When man/science makes a new discovery or "creates" a new theory, the goal posts must be moved to accomodate new knowledge.
Our sentience
Our need to know
Our need to know why and how
Our love our hate
Our incessant search of creation/origin
Our incessant need to explore the unknown from the depths of Earth and its oceans to the far reaches of the universe.
The perfection of physical life
The conscious/sub-conscious and un-tapped spiritual mind
These are the reasons I would never rule out an intelligent creator/god/designer/entity or whatever name you prefer.
Originally posted by faceoff85
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
Apology accepted even though I kinda knew it wasn't meant that way... just felt it that way but thanks for playing along with me
But anyway would you mind rechecking my previous post and give me you POV on that subject I presented in the edit? Im curious what your take on that is.
damn you're populair, wonder if you even have time to check it
[edit on 18-5-2010 by faceoff85]
Originally posted by Conclusion
Lol. They cannot explain why the earth revolves around the sun. lol. Science cannot even explain the how of gravity.
Originally posted by noonebutme
reply to post by Conclusion
While I have no evidence of it, I would wager a guess that not everyone "assumed" God was real and believed in that position. I'm sure there were atheists or agnostics back then as well.
And a widely-held belief doesn't make it fact or truth. Why should the non-believer have to prove X doesn't exist when all immediate evidence already lends itself to that fact.
It's the job of the believer to prove that such abstract, unobservable phenomena exists. Because otherwise, anyone can say anything tenuous and it's defacto "true" unless successfully disputed otherwise when regardless of position, there's no facts to use as evidence, either for or against.
Originally posted by Conclusion
Atheism's only explanation for everything is randomness.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Conclusion
Atheism's only explanation for everything is randomness.
That's the common misconception that's already been addressed in this thread. Atheism is strictly the lack of belief in dieties, nothing more. Neither atheism or science claims that "everything is randomness". It seems that both you and the OP operate on faulty assumptions. Perhaps you should do more research in the areas of atheism and science.
Originally posted by noonebutme
Originally posted by Conclusion
Lol. They cannot explain why the earth revolves around the sun. lol. Science cannot even explain the how of gravity.
Well, not yet. But that's the beauty of science over religious faith; empirical testing and data collecting in the search of truth.
Science can admit it's wrong, adjust itself (theories/hypotheses) accordingly and continue onwards looking for the truth. It allows for change and new evidence. It's about learning.
Religious faith is based strictly on belief - not evidence or facts.
Sure, science cannot explain everything - but it's at least trying to. While science isn't happy-clappy and feelgood like a religious faith might be, it is at least "real". And I prefer real over fantasy.
Originally posted by faceoff85
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
So where is your undeniable truth that a Creator does not exist?
One cannot prove a negative. The burden of proof is on those that claim invisible and/or absent entities exist.
WRONG
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Conclusion
Atheism's only explanation for everything is randomness.
That's the common misconception that's already been addressed in this thread. Atheism is strictly the lack of belief in dieties, nothing more. Neither atheism or science claims that "everything is randomness". It seems that both you and the OP operate on faulty assumptions. Perhaps you should do more research in the areas of atheism and science.
Originally posted by damwel
Originally posted by faceoff85
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
So where is your undeniable truth that a Creator does not exist?
One cannot prove a negative. The burden of proof is on those that claim invisible and/or absent entities exist.
WRONG
No I am afraid he is correct. Under the rules of logic a negative cannot be proven and does not have to be. If you believe in a creator it is up to you to prove it. He doesn't have to prove there isn't one. Have you ever taken a course in logic. This is like the first thing you learn. Look it up before you makes claims that he is wrong.
Originally posted by Conclusion
Well first off the belief of a creator was a common held truth through out the world until the accusation that a god didn't exist came into effect.
Man's first gods were the forces of nature. Terrifying and unpredictable, they were feared rather than revered by our ancestors. Yet while much of the world was in darkness, worshipping cruel incarnations of natural forces, a river valley in Africa held a people who followed a different path. They worshipped gods that were beautiful to behold, luminous beings that walked the earth, guiding the human race to Paradise. They had human forms but were much more powerful; yet like humans, they got angry, despaired, fought with one another, had children, and fell in love. They lived lives that were very much like those of the people who worshipped them, the ancient Egyptians.
They were gods to be feared yes, as all gods are, but they were also gods to be loved. What's more, the Egyptians enjoyed talking about the gods. Like the gods of the Greeks and Romans, the Egyptian gods seemed to be made for storytelling. There were tales to educate, tales to entertain, and tales with morals, and in those stories, the gods didn't seem so far away and unreachable. It was comforting to hear that the gods also wept for those they had lost, to hear about the gods laughing, to learn that the gods faced many of the same problems that the people did, albeit on a grander scale. In learning about the gods on such an intimate level, the Egyptians could better relate to the universe around them.
Originally posted by Conclusion
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Conclusion
Atheism's only explanation for everything is randomness.
That's the common misconception that's already been addressed in this thread. Atheism is strictly the lack of belief in dieties, nothing more. Neither atheism or science claims that "everything is randomness". It seems that both you and the OP operate on faulty assumptions. Perhaps you should do more research in the areas of atheism and science.
Interesting. What is an atheist's view on how life began then?
Originally posted by Conclusion
You know I agree with you about science changing. It seems to change almost yearly. You see that is the thing. I do not view it as science vs religion. I love science. It explains HOW some things work and that is great. Science cannot admit it is wrong. Only the people who call themselves scientists can admit if they wrong. Sadly when it comes to archaeology that is not the case. You prefer real over fantasy? Me too. I know that I will not live long enough to know everything. Oh and scientific theories are also based upon belief.