It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Atheism is commonly described as the position that there are no deities. It can also mean the rejection of belief in the existence of deities. A broader meaning is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist. Atheism is distinguished from theism, which in its most general form is belief that at least one deity exists.
Agnosticism is the view that the truth value of certain claims—especially claims about the existence or non-existence of any deity, but also other religious and metaphysical claims—is unknown or unknowable. Agnosticism can be defined in various ways, and is sometimes used to indicate doubt or a skeptical approach to questions. In some senses, agnosticism is a stance about the similarities or differences between belief and knowledge, rather than about any specific claim or belief.
Evolutionism refers to a theory of evolution, specifically to a widely held 19th century belief that organisms are intrinsically bound to improve themselves, and that changes are progressive and arise through inheritance of acquired characters, as in Lamarckism. The belief was extended to include cultural evolution and social evolution. The term is sometimes also used to refer to acceptance of the modern evolutionary synthesis, a scientific theory that describes how biological evolution occurred. In addition, the term is used in a broader sense to cover a world-view on a wide variety of topics, including chemical evolution as an alternative term for abiogenesis or for nucleosynthesis of chemical elements, galaxy formation and evolution, stellar evolution, spiritual evolution, technological evolution and universal evolution, which seeks to explain every aspect of the world in which we live.
Originally posted by Utopian
The reason for creating this thread is to debate the seemingly closed mindedness of Atheism in relation to most other belief systems.
I must admit though i will never feel comfortable with the theory that creation is random and that the universe in all its complexity has not been created by some form of intelligence.
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
So where is your undeniable truth that a Creator does not exist?
Originally posted by SentientBeyondDesign
But much like rowdy religious nuts, there are also obnoxious and just really unpleasant atheists that try to create this "my beliefs are fact" thing. And it really makes them look no better than those they criticize. (From a SCIENTIFIC perspective.)
Originally posted by faceoff85
uhmmm... here the OP posts his message in such a way that nobody can take offence
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
So where is your undeniable truth that a Creator does not exist?
One cannot prove a negative. The burden of proof is on those that claim invisible and/or absent entities exist.
Originally posted by faceoff85
WRONG, the burden of proof lies with anyone claiming ANYTHING including the calim that there is no god
Originally posted by faceoff85
then are you saying you do not reject the possibility of a god being real? If so... do you believe there is a way for believers to prove to you his existence?
BTW Its pretty easy to find out wether there are invisible entities out there... this site holds tons and tons of intel on them.... so I guess folowing reasonable deduction isn't it very possible for there to be some form of main-invisible entity out there?
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by faceoff85
WRONG, the burden of proof lies with anyone claiming ANYTHING including the calim that there is no god
Not believing in deities is not a claim that there is no god. Maybe there is. It's up to those claiming there is one to supply the evidence.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
If I am a proper skeptic I won't dismiss the possibility of gods/deities/creators. However, there exists no evidence of such and the universe does not require any for it to work. Reasonable deduction is insufficient as evidence: it is always disputable because it is intangible and untestable.
Originally posted by SentientBeyondDesign
I personally believe that a mixture of faith and science is needed.