It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by Esoteric Teacher
I think looking for truth in anagrams is looking the wrong direction. .
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by Esoteric Teacher
I think looking for truth in anagrams is looking the wrong direction. .
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by Esoteric Teacher
"bye bye good luck convincing everybody that anagrams and whistleblowers go hand in hand" ( )
Originally posted by reeferman
Fact... I have no Idea why I looked this up...
Deny Ignorance....
Angry done nice
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
What the heck is this thread really for?
Addressing (acknowleding and reckognizing) obstacles that deter us from acceptance of what REAL tools we have at our disposal when determining what avenues and paths exist which lead us to viable, sustainable truisms, that remain truisms regardless of ridicule, criticism, and personal delusionary choices.
provide truisms capable of being truisms after your opinion is done with it's judgments, or isolate a statement or phrase that is not true and demonstrate the flawed logic you can identify, and share it with this thread and it's contributors
does this provide any clarification as to the intent of this thread?
was i unclear in the OP?
anagrams provide truisms, to include intimate knowledge of future events.
truisms that become true later in time existed prior to their full understanding. Or, at least your military top brass are convinced of this.
Originally posted by argentus
reply to post by kinda kurious
..... while others see signs of ancient civilizations.
I, personally, cannot vet the correlations without being there, in the OP's head.
.... perhaps they don't speak so loudly when a person is not looking for them? Just a thought.
I'm open to learning more though. Always open to more information that is conclusive.
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
STOP LYING YOU DISINFORMATION AGENT!!!!
If you produce lies, you fit the description of a Disinformation agent.
STOP LYING YOU DISINFORMATION AGENT!!!!
As for grammical inconsistancies in the anagrams ....
Sorry, i don't recall anywhere in my life where i became convinced that those who taught me grammar had a strangle hold monopoly on the truth.
why should i trust your version of grammar?
who taught you what you know about grammar?
your teachers never lied to you, or withheld known information?
[edit on 19-5-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]
If i did discover a theory of everything, i don't think i would want to. Then what would be left for anyone else to accomplish?
- Steven Hawking
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
reply to post by Esoteric Teacher
I do not understand you at all. What is this thread about then? The title would lead us to believe you have something to say about disinfo agents on ATS. What do you have to say about them? Who are they? What does it have to do with anagrams?