It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Canada denies Quantum free energy company the right to become a public company due to being 'danger

page: 4
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in


posted on May, 18 2010 @ 01:51 PM

Originally posted by Pankreas
This guy hast 2 interesting sounding patents:

Transition of a substance to a new state through use of energizer such as RF energy, US 5,537,009 (16.07.1996); link
Methods and systems for generating high energy photons or quantum energy, US 6,936,971 (30.08.2005) link

[edit on 17-5-2010 by Pankreas]

couldn't that first one include simply putting a glass of water in a microwave oven until it boils? Glanced at it and that's the first thing I thought of. Although now I see he says rf freq of around 1 MHz. Home Microwave ovens are significantly higher I think.

It also kinda seemed odd that a few of his employers and/or associates/people who can verify he did what he says are no longer around (either out of business or dead). Convenient? Or CONSPIRACY??!
I can guess which will get more votes...

posted on May, 18 2010 @ 02:16 PM

Originally posted by TrueBrit
I have heard everything now. Rather than co opting the scientist, the company he is involved with, and therefore the technology that they are offering , the Canadian government have slammed the entire idea because it threatens the status quo.

Not surprising. The canadian electricity board will never entertain this and I am talking from experience.
Neither the US doE will entertain, again from experience


posted on May, 18 2010 @ 02:18 PM
reply to post by beebs

His site was written in Bulgarian and not Russian.

I'm only letting you know

posted on May, 18 2010 @ 02:28 PM

Originally posted by PPGrocks
I'm not sure what we are looking at does this machine create such an energy to power anything...If this is like fusion by creating a plasma and heating it to 100000000 degrees the amount of energy put into this process far outweighs what is recieved in the end...I can't see how this is some great miracle free energy...its not free... energy is put into this machine, and probably a lot of it, and who knows what is recieved in the end...

This Magnetic machine is not hooked up to any power source, and in one of the videos he takes it apart to show it's GUTZ! He has 180 small magnets in cylinders, which rotate much like a rotisserie oven, there are about 7 slots for a cylinder of magnets to fit into. The motor is started with a crankshaft that only needs to be turned once, once it has been turned the magnetic fields generated by all 7 cylinders is enough to catch the next row of cylinders therefor making it spin. Kinda like putting north and north magnets together - they repel each other. He is using this concept to make a motor and he has seemed to get its calibrations correct. No induction is needed, no battery is needed, and certainly no electric cord was needed. The only problem with this machine is creating enough "spin" to actually spin the gear of a electric generator, therefore having output with no input.

[edit on 18-5-2010 by SneakAPeek]

posted on May, 18 2010 @ 02:35 PM
sorry, double posted trying to edit:::

[edit on 18-5-2010 by SneakAPeek]

posted on May, 18 2010 @ 03:33 PM

Originally posted by NWtoHide
It seems there has to be someone out there that has the funds available to make this technology widely available to the public that has their head in the right place. We just need to find this person and bring information like this to their attention before people start "disappearing".

Tony Stark!!(IronMan) He's got the money and the means... LoL sorry had to say it. Saw Iron Man 2 last weekend guess thats why my mind went there first.

posted on May, 18 2010 @ 04:10 PM
reply to post by crezo

is there any independant evidence for his claims ?

posted on May, 18 2010 @ 05:47 PM
Make no judgment until you see some actual evidence folks. All you've got to go on is a rant on some guy's website. Now, if he is able to provide the documents that prove this conspiracy, then go right ahead. Seems like it would be easy enough for the guy to scan the letter he got. Why didn't he do this? (Probably because it's not true).

posted on May, 18 2010 @ 07:10 PM

Originally posted by SpectreDC
And now people know how Nikola Tesla felt.


But the fact that people are reluctant to fund, is almost better than it being bought out under him by an evil man, like in teslas' case, and shelved. That broke my heart.

posted on May, 18 2010 @ 09:37 PM
I know that a lot of people wouldn't like what I'm going to say. I don't like it to but it is true, imagine if we have free energy, not cheap I mean free than the people that work in the oil industry, the ones that extract the oil, that drive the trucks, that fly the planes, helicopters, oil tankers will become jobless. These companies are huge and have many employees. Also the stock market will crash, which means that the other companies will go down. Imagine how many gas stations are there or how much from the infrastructure will need to change. I think all of it actually. Every job I can think of is connected somehow with the oil industry. These things take many many years so they can change without catastrophic consequences.
You can see that we are switching to electrical power now. I'm sure it can be done faster if there aren't any wars present. But it will still need major infrastructure change.
My opinion is that if we don't have a system that can include free energy. If we try harder all of us we will find a way to integrate it into the society. Not with capitalism though. We need a system that isn't based on money. These inventions shouldn't disappear as the governments do now, there is no need for them to be that scared, they should continue ti develop them publicly as some form of motivation to the humanity so it will want to change faster.

posted on May, 19 2010 @ 01:13 AM
reply to post by crezo

Very beautiful I can't wait to see these types of things shatter our economy and send us toward a new society.

posted on May, 19 2010 @ 01:23 AM
reply to post by crezo

I'm surprised he even got this far, usually by even going to a patent office that alerts the PTB about your invention. The US I've heard has something like a cavet saying that if your inventions poses undue hardship on the economy (this would believe me) then they can stop you from launching it into the economy and pay you for keeping it off the market. If you have a technology like this it would enable people not to have powerlines or be on the grid. Lets imagine something else, that they invented not only quantum free energy from the space around us but can convert energy into matter like some form of replicator. You could replicate your own food, free energy and even replicate water if needed, along with clothes and what you need. So if your able to do all that, then what do you need the govt. for truly. In all actuality the power structure of the world and the country would change from a handful of power centers to thousands. You could literally get a group of people and form your own society without the help of centralized govt.. What this will do is essentially throw a jump ball up in the air and groups will have to fight.

posted on May, 19 2010 @ 03:05 AM
but they ARE a danger, free energy would mean lots of greedy companies with heavy taxing would be rendered obsolete.
That is all it boils down to really, If it doesn't generate money then it isn't worth using.
I am just waiting to be taxed on the air I breath...*enter pollution/global warming tax*

posted on May, 19 2010 @ 06:11 AM
I think its about time our world should sacrafice our present for the sake of our species future !

if we jump to free energy then develop[ing nations wouldnt be using fossil fuels !

We need to stop thinking about dollars and think about our species survival!

posted on May, 19 2010 @ 08:04 AM
I agree with all of you. I want to have replicator home and free energy and to take the flying car to mars. But I cant see it happening in the next 50 years. Maybe I'm wrong. I hope so.

posted on May, 19 2010 @ 12:27 PM
This guy is going the wrong way with patents and multinational companies.

He should open source it.

Explain EXACTLY how to build a small 3-5kw version for home and vehicle powering, a list of materials needed, perhaps even a kit form job.

He could ask for donations for the information, and i mean donation, not sell the info. A kind of 'shareware' deal for the technology.

If just 10% of the people that use the technology, gave $1.00 per year, he'd have more money than he'd know what to do with.

Plus of course, he'd have the moral satisfaction of knowing he'd just saved the planet, and his technology will continue to save millions of people every year, and take us to the stars and onwards.

Open source is the way to go...patents are old hat.

posted on May, 19 2010 @ 03:08 PM
Well that's surprising that Canadian authorities can be so frank. At least they DO admit, now, that free energy devices go against the political system that focuses around exploiting people with crappy technologies and non-renewable energy devices and practices.

posted on May, 20 2010 @ 03:35 AM

Originally posted by Echtelion
Well that's surprising that Canadian authorities can be so frank.

Where did canadian authorities make any such statement.

At least they DO admit, now, that free energy devices go against the political system that focuses around exploiting people with crappy technologies and non-renewable energy devices and practices.

Where did they admit that?

Do you have reliable sources.

First... A patent does not guarantee that the patented invention actually works as described or even at all.

Second... The assumption that having an investor means the technology is real, is outright dumb.

look up some of the claims about compression of random data, where a 5 minute meeting with a math professor from the local school, could have saved many investors millions.

Third... When someone claims that the government is suppressing them or their technology, you should be very careful, as history is littered with examples of people using that excuse to fleece investors. Remember that the hidden implication is that the technology is so revolutionary that it would turn the whole world upside down, making YOU, the investor who were smart and savvy enough to invest is that technology, a gazillionaire. They are playing on your greed and ego at the same time.

[edit on 20-5-2010 by aaa2500]

posted on May, 20 2010 @ 03:53 AM
This free energy thing sounds a bit too good to be true. It really reminds me of the Phantom video game system (we all know how well that went over). Could he be trying to get some press and more money? Only time will tell. I am hopeful though.

posted on May, 20 2010 @ 11:10 AM
reply to post by defiler

The skills which make the people you speak of good at what they are employed to do , are not exclusive to the job roles which they currently occupy. Needless to say the persons who are flying choppers too and from rigs, are quite capable of getting any old piloting job, and contrary to opinion , there are not a small number of vacancies in that regard in other sectors. Similarly , if you can drill oil, then there are SEVERAL jobs you could go out and get without a moments hesitation. It takes a hell of a lot of qualification , and expertise, and therefore anyone employed in that role will be highly sought by all sorts of geological, and engineering firms to do work which doesnt have a catastrophic end result for human kind.
Further more, I have heard others worry about infrastructural support staff, like cable layers, call centre employees, electrical engineers and power station employees. In my opinion, this sort of technology should only be handled by engineers and scientists ANYWAY , so there would still be power stations, just more effective, less environmentaly damaging, and more cost effective ones. Therefore, there would still have to be cables, and call centres and call out engineers and the paperwork that goes with them. The only difference would be that instead of paying through the nose for fuel as well as customer support, the service provider would only need to/ be moraly capable of charging for, the customer support network which runs the system.
The only people who wouldnt benifit from this inovation would be the suits who control the oil. The men who do battle on paper, and destroy lives by way of bank balances. They neither need, nor deserve our consideration in any way.
For the first time in history , access to power could be affordable for EVERYONE no matter how poor (in Britain people have died in the winter, because they were afraid of getting big power bills if they turned on thier heating. They were mostly OAPs and therefore some of our most vunerable citizens). With this technology in place, the people of the world would be MUCH better off, and able to put a more significant portion of thier income into things like the schooling of thier children, feeding thier families wholesome good quality (read :expensive) food, and some of them being able to afford to get away from thier desks for the first time in a decade. In other sectors, the governments of the world would be able to power thier installations for peanuts, saving everyone money in tax. Every street lamp, saved on. Every office block, saved on. Every hospital, police station, every single facet of government,and authority , making savings they can pass on to the citizens of the nations of the planet.
There are so many reasons to end our dependancy on fossil fuels, that to NOT take this technology for a ride is completely and utterly insane. Even if you dont agree that global warming is partly human in origin, you must know that the fumes from vehicles are damaging to the health of the young? If electricial power were cheaper, then more research would be undertaken by the car industry into its use as a primary , or sole power source for vehicles, thereby creating a cleaner safer environment for our young, preventing carbon dioxide and monoxides from attacking our offspring at thier most vunerable. Another reason to end our carbon dependancy is that politicaly speaking, it makes no sense to allow the price of oil to dictate what happens to whom when. Wars have been fought, under banners of freedom, or vengance, over oil. Innocent people have died so that others might benifit from a better supply of it, and others have died to deny oil to thier enemies. Should this stop now ? Or were we secretly enjoying the barbarism ?
The oil spill of the Gulf Of Mexico, ought to show that oil is , although easy to use, not a safe and therefore not a viable fuel source for the future.
If this Quantum Free Energy can be proven, reproduced, and industrialised, we could see a world where having the power to get up and go, to run a home, run a nation, wouldnt see huge pitfalls in terms of danger to the environment , danger to the health of the young or those with cronic respiratory problems, and wouldnt involve dependancy on unstable governments and territories, and further more would not depend on a minted few dragging every last cent and penny from the pockets of people just trying to keep thier families healthy enough to one day leave the nest and make a home of thier own.
The real question is, do you love oil that much that you fail to see the benifits of a fuel source which cannot be exploited? Do you love it that much that even when it is running out, and costs you a hundred dollars or pounds to fill your car, are you still going to love it? If not, why the hell arent you more in favour of this new tech and the potential it has? Wake up and smell the ...Oh wait, is that FRESH AIR ?

[edit on 20-5-2010 by TrueBrit]

new topics

top topics

<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in