It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Once again, you are being racist...and it's sad, whether or not you
are brown, white, green or purple......
It is about numbers. If you have for example 14,000 + illegals crossing over the Texas/Mexico border in a month, do you not believe that in those 14,000+ people that the chances are higher that one of them could be carrying a nuke in their briefcase??? versus say 14,000 people crossing in one year? Once again, you are not thinking logically.
Who is making belitting and racist comments now?
Are all examples you posted in response to various comments made
here.
Using the race card is a racist act in itself.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by prionace glauca
I thought you were for border security?
But only on the southern border...right???
This only confirms what many of us already think...it isn't about "border security"...it is about brown people.
If you want border security and walls built everywhere...then be prepared for the governemnt to be doing this all along the northern and southern border.
Originally posted by prionace glauca
reply to post by manta78
To some tackling border priorities where they are needed the most is an act of racism. These people do not think with their minds but only bellow the bigot hatred they have grown accustomed to.
Vermont to be recognized as danger zone or a hot spot is ludicrous. This administration looks like a fool everyday whenever they believe they are trying to protect this nation.
These people do not think with their minds but only bellow the bigot hatred they have grown accustomed to.
Vermont to be recognized as danger zone or a hot spot is ludicrous.
This is a silly race bait. they need to start on the Southern border because that is the biggest threat. More people are killed by illegal mexicans than illegal canadians. to argue otherwise is stupid.
First of all, I would think that they would want to deal with the worst spots first, then, work on those areas that may be a problem in the future.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by prionace glauca
The people of the southern border have already given the government land, how do u think they were able to build a fence in the first place?
I didn't ask if they have or not already. I am asking if you support the government seizing land from American citizens to secure the southern border.
There were plenty of lawsuits about this very topic when they were building the "fence" (joke).
I'm just curious if you support the government seizing property on the southern border because you seem very against them doing it on the northern border.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
It is the same idiocy as searching old ladies at the airports, while letting obviously Arab people to walk through unabated.
Sure, it is politically correct. But it is also stupid. Very stupid.
So what would be the logic in NOT plugging a hole that they see as a weak spot?
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
This is a silly race bait. they need to start on the Southern border because that is the biggest threat. More people are killed by illegal mexicans than illegal canadians. to argue otherwise is stupid.
No one is arguing that.
If you read the article their reason for doing this is that it is a potential weak spot where terrorists could sneak in dangerous material.
What is more of a threat to national security...illegal immigrants where the majority are coming to work and then you have a small percentage that have killed an American citizen.
Or the possibility of a terrorists bringing in a briefcase nuke and in 6 hours being in New York City???
I have no problem with the governemtn securing either border...my problem is with those that spout off about all this being about "border security"...and then complain when they are trying to plug a hole in a location they deemed a weak spot....just because it is on the northern border and not the southern border.
To me...this just diplays that their true intentions aren't "border security"...it is just "keep out the brown people".
Call it a "race bait" if you want...but nothing I said is untrue.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Ah...you must be privy to the that intel as well that shows where the most dangerous spots are...right?
Again...the government can multitask...just because they are doing this in Vermont doesn't mean they can't do something on the southern border as well.
So what would be the logic in NOT plugging a hole that they see as a weak spot?
You ever hear of the phrase "low hanging fruit"...this is a quick one to fix for them...I don't understand why anyone of you who support "border security" would be against this.
It is all very funny to me.