Video of girls dancing in lingerie causes internet row

page: 14
16
<< 11  12  13   >>

log in

join

posted on May, 23 2010 @ 10:13 AM
link   
Sex sells. Sexual suggestion pays more. Women do not really understand why sex is such a big market when they give it up for the husbands and boyfriends, heck, they even give it up for a stranger on occasion. Yet this is not enough to fill the appetites of those insatiable perverts, voyeaurs, and pedaphiles.

On the other hand, these videos do keep some vaginas safe (old and wrinkled) while endangaring others (the fresh untapped). Don't take it personal: It's just business.

Heck, why not put all young fresh virgins on the market. It's what we do and pays the bills, right? It's not like pornography because these tikes have strips of covering so that means it can't be wrong. Anyways, the moveie industry already prooved that naked girls (the younger the better) sells tickets! Not their problem if some of the audience is a bit demented and goes after these young girls (or boys for that matter!).

Parent's responisbility to protect their child on the first line of defence. Like not making the tike undress in public could be a good place to start.

Our children have always been marketed as our ticket to the American Dream of prosperity. We are all slaves and sex slaves pay the most. Dress up our little ones to mimmick whores and strippers, cash in, and then scream at our government for allowing these sex criminals to move into our neighborhoods!

Sorry guys...If you have testicles, I have already discounted your opinion! This is a case for women and our offspring.

Is this really what our ancestors in the civil rights movement was hoping to accomplish? Freedom of the prostitution of our children? Boys or girls does not matter since there is a market for both. yeah, I know...it's just business!

My proposal is to remove all the Amber alerts and milk carton ads if parents are going to continue to parade their children in front of criminals. Oh, did I hear a protest or perhaps a half of a million protests against this policy? Okay, how about making child pornography illegal? Oops, sorry, it is already illegal. Then why is it not more detailed despite the child's parent pimps? Money? It's just business, right? So is child traficking and forced prostitution.

It's a sick world, why change it in the middle of a boom in income for the pimps of children? It is what America wants to see otherwise there would be laws against it!

I so want to throw up now (for real) after having reguritated all these so-called reasons and excuses! Excuse my spelling and grammar...no time for checks...vomit on the way!




posted on May, 23 2010 @ 10:19 AM
link   
reply to post by peggy m
 


Just in case any of you want to take on reasons...My young son is dead so don't even go there with me when you defend these little girls in stripper costumes! I went through the legal battle and found out it was my fault. Now I am on the jury.



posted on May, 23 2010 @ 10:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by peggy m

On the other hand, these videos do keep some vaginas safe (old and wrinkled) while endangaring others (the fresh untapped). Don't take it personal: It's just business.


You think this and you are woman??

Your entire post nearly made me


I take it you are not a mother??

Only someone who has zero understanding of the joy of instilling in your own children your thoughts and feelings, values and principles and helping them grow into productive members of society, could write a post like yours.

In fact I may go further and say your post was pro pedophile...

Very sick very sick indeed!!!



Korg.



posted on May, 23 2010 @ 10:38 PM
link   
Anyone, without a sick mind, will respect these little girls for their routine. They are a product of their environment, the music industry, and the competition judges. They are doing what it takes to win. Most can respect that, unless they have a perverted mind.



posted on May, 24 2010 @ 09:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by LooseLipsSinkShips
Anyone, without a sick mind, will respect these little girls for their routine. They are a product of their environment, the music industry, and the competition judges. They are doing what it takes to win. Most can respect that, unless they have a perverted mind.

So you are OK with them doing the dance nude, just as long as people observe it with a sense of the art it is?



posted on May, 24 2010 @ 09:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by earthdude

Originally posted by LooseLipsSinkShips
Anyone, without a sick mind, will respect these little girls for their routine. They are a product of their environment, the music industry, and the competition judges. They are doing what it takes to win. Most can respect that, unless they have a perverted mind.

So you are OK with them doing the dance nude, just as long as people observe it with a sense of the art it is?


It's part of the dance routine and parent approved. I think you may just have a dirty mind...



posted on May, 24 2010 @ 10:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by earthdude

So you are OK with them doing the dance nude, just as long as people observe it with a sense of the art it is?


Firstly they are not in the nude. Secondly I agree with the post above this one. Nothing wrong in this at all, it's totally innocent and if you think otherwise you may want to examine your own thoughts about these girls.

Peace out,

Korg.



posted on May, 24 2010 @ 01:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Korg Trinity
 


I agree that it is innocent. Where do you draw the line? I would not be sexually stimilated if they were nude. You did not understand my point. At what age is a sexual dance permissible? What makes it sexual to you? It would be nice if we lived in a country where women could dance nude everywhere, but we don't. When would this dance become offensive to those who think it is innocent? G-strings?



posted on May, 27 2010 @ 02:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by earthdude
reply to post by Korg Trinity
 


I agree that it is innocent. Where do you draw the line? I would not be sexually stimilated if they were nude. You did not understand my point. At what age is a sexual dance permissible? What makes it sexual to you? It would be nice if we lived in a country where women could dance nude everywhere, but we don't. When would this dance become offensive to those who think it is innocent? G-strings?


Yes it's innocent. Different parents can draw the line at different places I guess. For my 8-year old daughter the line is at the bikini, and G-strings or thongs are over the line. And basically that's what one of the girls mothers told a reporter who covered the story, that her daughter is allowed to wear a bikini at the public beach (like many 8 year olds are) and the dance costume covers more than the bikini does.

But what I didn't know until I read this is that a mother attributed the dance moves to Alvin and the Chipmunks!!

www.popeater.com...


Melissa Presch, mother of one of the little dancers, told 'Inside Edition' that the girls got their moves from the 'Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel' -- not Beyonce's music video.


I haven't seen that movie, but can anyone confirm if they really got those moves from that movie as the mom claims?

If that's true, what's next? Calls by angry parents to ban the movie 'Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel' because the dance moves in it are corrupting their kids?



posted on May, 27 2010 @ 03:38 AM
link   
reply to post by Dark Ghost
 


The first thing I have to say to you is the sarcasm button was screaming so loudly I had to take cover, so obviously I did not have to realize it was on.

Secondly, wouldn't it be more helpful if you spelt things out to people?

Like - DO NOT PUT YOUR LITTLE KIDS IN MAKEUP AND ENTER THEM IN BEAUTY PAGEANTS?

That is NOT a healthy thing to do - let them discover the world, discover their own personality, and discover what they need to do in this life. Do not put your wishes onto your children.



posted on May, 27 2010 @ 04:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by catwhoknows
The first thing I have to say to you is the sarcasm button was screaming so loudly I had to take cover, so obviously I did not have to realize it was on.

Was just making sure that all those who read the post knew it was sarcastic. Sometimes it is difficult to tell on the internet when you have not read previous posts in the thread.


Secondly, wouldn't it be more helpful if you spelt things out to people?

Like - DO NOT PUT YOUR LITTLE KIDS IN MAKEUP AND ENTER THEM IN BEAUTY PAGEANTS?

You would think this was common knowledge. This thread seems to indicate otherwise, so maybe you have a point there.


That is NOT a healthy thing to do - let them discover the world, discover their own personality, and discover what they need to do in this life. Do not put your wishes onto your children.

Well said and I agree. It seems many people in this thread also agree with that message. But I guess the reason we feel this way is because we all have "sick" and "dirty" minds...



posted on May, 27 2010 @ 04:32 AM
link   
reply to post by Dark Ghost
 


NO, it is because a lot of other people have sick and dirty minds.

And these women who do that to their daughters are abusers, plain and simple.





new topics
top topics
 
16
<< 11  12  13   >>

log in

join