posted on May, 16 2010 @ 06:32 PM
Ok, Here is my idea -
Lets put together the rules of engagement for divide and conquer techniques. What i mean by this is lets develop a hypothetical agenda and develop the
rules that we would use to define a divide and conquer technique on a group of people.
This is kind of a counter intelligence approach.
Lemme try to come up with a few rules as an example -
1) A set of rules - If we create a set of rules, there will be reason for them to create and fight over the rules. What we need to do is convince them
that rules are necessary. What this will do is subconsciously implant into their head that they need to be told what to do.
2) A New Religion - Lets take those set of rules and apply them to 3 different sets of religions. Lets word them differently and apply them to
different deities in different languages so that now instead of just having rules, they have a ruler, and a set of rules to defend. This will also
make them more comfortable with the idea of having a ruler subconsciously.
Now i am not suggesting that my examples are correct, they are just simply what i have chosen to use.
Can anyone constructively add to this list? Can we come to fully understand the techniques used against so we can now begin to thwart these and have a
more comprehensive way of exposing them? For instance...
Using the topic to prove a divide and conquer mechanism is fruitless. I say this because it is still the topic/idea that is being presented that is
actually being used. So people will still be fighting over the idea of the mechanism rather then the mechanism itself. If can identify the mechanisms
and plan out a rules of engagement type of scenario in an applied model, mybe we could shed more light on the origins of all these
Lets call it reverse engineering the conspiracy to uncover the truth.
I hope i have conveyed my idea properly. Please feel free to add constructive criticism, and or ideas.