reply to post by sdocpublishing
I agree with you.
When the news is in unison, it is rigged, because as we saw with the Fort Hood incident, and the NYC Car Bomb incident - to name two - the media are
When the story is different on every channel, especially when it is breaking news, you can bet your bottom dollar that no one is spoon feeding the
The thing that got me about 911, for instance, was how they all had the same video feed, the same information, and almost at the exact same time. One
video block was used by every news channel, because it was the only one available in the media pool.
That should have set off alarm bells, as it rightly did at a later point in time.
Inconsistencies in the media are a good thing, IMO, because it prompts one to dig deeper into the issue to find out the real story. Eventually it
comes out, but it can be days, weeks, or even months later.
Some people will probably claim the exact opposite - or say do not trust the media at all, but I think inconsistancies prove they are talking to
different sources rather than to only one source.
As the days went by following the NYC Car Bomb incident, you can see that a real story came to fruition. Some people may doubt the veracity of it
because they are in denial about terrorism and run around screaming False Flag about everything, but if you saw the media play itself out it became
They started out almost immediately with the "white guy in his 40's" and rapidly went to homegrown tea party terrorist. In the end, when certain
media groups openly expressed disappointment it was *not* a white tea party terrorist, you can see a job well done as far as the real story coming
It does take common sense, but it also takes a lesser degree of paranoia that everything is a flase flag or some secret dirty government conspiracy.
Part of what makes it so fun is the discovery of a conspiracy!
[edit on 16-5-2010 by Libertygal]