It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fallow the light
well that all depends on you level of "bad". if you compare nickelodeon now to nickelodeon 15 years ago, the nickelodeon now has much more adult subject and destructive influence. just because the kids on nick are not dancing half naked on a stripper pole, does not mean they are not acting in a manner which is not appropriate for children of certain ages.
nick use to have allot of wholesome programming but not every thing is mindless entertainment to keep the kids quiet. disney is just evil and does not even need to be addressed.
Why do all the Disney stars turn out bad
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Well, what is your definition of bad? I mean, there was Jamie Spears (Britney Spears little sister) who got pregnant at 15/16 and they had to cancel her nick show because of it.
No offence intended, of course, but considering the reputation of male dancers and theater in general, isn't this comparable to bemoaning the overtly brazen homosexuality at a hair salon or flower shop?
Originally posted by LordBucket
reply to post by Donnie Darko
My impression of the Disney-employee culture was that there was a tremendous amount of overtly brazen homosexuality.
considering the reputation of male dancers and theater in general, isn't this
comparable to bemoaning the overtly brazen homosexuality at a hair salon or flower shop?
It's been my experience that most gay men have no
desire to turn someone's daugther into a little slut.
Is it your contention that the increased sexuality of the youths
of every sexual orientation can be attributed solely to the gays?