It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Do the Russians have the answer to stopping the oil well disaster for good?

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 15 2010 @ 04:04 PM
link   
A low yield tactical nuke placed on the seabed could effectivly plug the leak.



Komsomoloskaya Pravda, the best-selling Russian daily, reports that in Soviet times such leaks were plugged with controlled nuclear blasts underground.

It’s so simple, in fact, that the Soviet Union, a major oil exporter, used this method five times to deal with petrocalamities. The first happened in Uzbekistan, on September 30, 1966 with a blast 1.5 times the strength of the Hiroshima bomb and at a depth of 1.5 kilometers. KP also notes that subterranean nuclear blasts were used as much as 169 times in the Soviet Union to accomplish fairly mundane tasks like creating underground storage spaces for gas or building canals.

trueslant.com...




[edit on 15-5-2010 by In nothing we trust]




posted on May, 15 2010 @ 04:39 PM
link   
More information about the technique.



The technique described involves drilling a hole between 25 and 50 metres from the oil well and setting off a customised nuke. Between 1966 and 1981 it was used five times for four successes, with the failure possibly due to bad positioning.

www.shortnews.com...


Is it possible that BP is pumping tons of harmful chemicals into the area in order to make the scene so environmentally damaged that people will not protest too loudly about a nuke being used?



posted on May, 15 2010 @ 04:47 PM
link   
Really?
Really!
Let's make the water radioactive! Blow a bigger hole in it is going to stop it!

Magma is the answer!
Nature has used it for billions of years!
And it has worked for billions of years.
But the NWO, Globalists, or Powers That Be, will deny that they have the technology to produce a magma plug.

[edit on 15-5-2010 by Violater1]



posted on May, 15 2010 @ 04:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Violater1
 


By using the existing rock and sediment around the site, an electric kiln would melt the rock, and plug the hole.
It can be done.



posted on May, 15 2010 @ 05:28 PM
link   
This is the most worrying:

subterranean nuclear blasts were used as much as 169 times in the Soviet Union to accomplish fairly mundane tasks like creating underground storage spaces for gas or building canals.


They actually used nukes to create canals! Unbelievable!

Let the Russian's nuke the gulf of Mexico, it will be a dream come true for the generals.



posted on May, 15 2010 @ 05:34 PM
link   
That is their big plan? Blow it up?


Wow, those scientists are really working in over drive.



posted on May, 15 2010 @ 05:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by john124

Let the Russian's nuke the gulf of Mexico, it will be a dream come true for the generals.


Oh I don't think they are volunteering for the job. However they may be willing to fly in some of thier experts to act as consultants to the US military.

I think they want America to do it.

[edit on 15-5-2010 by In nothing we trust]



posted on May, 15 2010 @ 05:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Common Good
That is their big plan? Blow it up?


Wow, those scientists are really working in over drive.


It actually makes perfect sense.

I think radiation could be minimized by using the smallest nuke that would do the job.

They could name it something like, "Operation GulfCork", "BlowHole" or "SealTight"


[edit on 15-5-2010 by In nothing we trust]



posted on May, 15 2010 @ 05:39 PM
link   
reply to post by Violater1

underground nuclear blasts/tests do not effect anything outside the "hole" with radioactivity (thats slightly innaccurate, their is a very small amount but nothing very dangerous), this is why nuclear tests are done underground. The blast essencialy seals the hole off as the blast take out so much of the area and the compression of the blast melts the rock which was in the space and this instantly seals the hole off from everything!

underground testing 101!

this is actualy the most sensible idea, BP most likely know this but have basicly tried to put a bandaid over this broken back of a calamity!

my guess is that a nuke costs alot more than anything they have tried to do yet!

in this case, the possible small amount of radiation is probably more worth it than to let the hole continue!

[edit on 15-5-2010 by boaby_phet]

[edit on 15-5-2010 by boaby_phet]



posted on May, 15 2010 @ 05:43 PM
link   
Either they'll let the oil run out or they'll nuke it. It's tried and tested.



posted on May, 15 2010 @ 05:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by boaby_phet

... the possible small amount of radiation is probably more worth it than to let the hole continue!


The area around the well is already envionmentally destabilized. Especially with the chemicals that they are now adding.

Maybe the blast would also be effective at dispersing the dispersant?



posted on May, 15 2010 @ 05:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by rizla
Either they'll let the oil run out or they'll nuke it. It's tried and tested.


It might open a whole new era where people are willing to replace outdated fossil fuel technology with nuclear power.

Just imagine how the benifits of nuclear power could be exalted and sold to the worlds population as the alternative to enviornmentally damaging fossil fuels.

They don't want renewable energy sources to get too much traction because they can't control prices like they can with oil and nuclear power.



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join