It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is Glenn Beck "uncovering" the "Conspiracy" of the Millenium?

page: 9
53
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 16 2010 @ 01:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Siren
 





Everyone knows what's wrong, but, nobody knows how to fix it and any ideas of change get labeled conspiracy.


Well I sure don't know how to fix it, I think it may be beyond fixing, I should just go watch Real Housewives of New York,



WE have nine pages here, and Beck hasn't even started.

[edit on 013131p://bSunday2010 by Stormdancer777]




posted on May, 16 2010 @ 01:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Siren
..........The system as it stands is corrupt. So how does it get fixed. Certainly not more of the same.

..........Everyone knows what's wrong, but, nobody knows how to fix it and any ideas of change get labeled conspiracy.


The tide has turned unfortunately - the good fight is lost. Ask any high school kid what is important - not once will you hear the word "family"; most likely you will see how they covet "things". This is the hook in most people and why many have lost so much in the financial crisis.

Around the world, there are pockets of people trying to resist the tyranny of the market or globalization. They are always marginalized and destroyed. I repeat - the good fight is lost!!



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 01:50 PM
link   
He might just be uncovering the conspiracy of the millenium...If it calls for the crying of crocodile tears and being one proud owner of a big fat bank account from FOX!

The only thing he's good for is spinning a story under the guise of a patriot for TPTB IMO...........



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 01:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Siren
 


Amen and amen!

Glen Beck is leading some of these poor souls down the path of subservance to the NWO. Unfortunately, many who have joined his fan club and received their complementary Glen Beck Kool-Aid can't discern truth.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 01:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by alttracks
reply to post by SpectreDC
 


Opinions do not refute facts. Unless you change the facts.

Still waiting for hard evidence.


See, this is just proof you haven't read anything I posted.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Like here where I clearly point out my questioning has nothing to do with the validity of this conspiracy.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Or here where I kindly ask someone to quote me where I say Beck is wrong about this.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Or here again where I said I don't deny anything Beck has revealed.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Or here where I go into great detail what my point is and what questions I have concerning why Beck is revealing this information and why, while the information is correct, it's being revealed on America's largest corporate news network and one of the worlds largest corporate media conglomerate.


Seriously, do people not read posts anymore?



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 01:56 PM
link   
post removed because the user has no concept of manners

Click here for more information.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 02:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Thirty_Foot_Smurf
I've recently started listening to Glenn Beck. Became an insider. Got my hands on archives going back years. This man has been nothing less than a modern day prophet with his predictions concerning the current financial meltdown.


"Prophet"
I think you meant Profit. :shk:

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 02:05 PM
link   
Its kinda funny how those who hate Beck, love obama, think this is foolishness, etc, etc, keep posting comments thus keeping this in the top of the discussions board so more can see it, thanks.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 02:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by I_am_Spartacus

Originally posted by romanmel
reply to post by Siren
 


Amen and amen!

Glen Beck is leading some of these poor souls down the path of subservance to the NWO. Unfortunately, many who have joined his fan club and received their complementary Glen Beck Kool-Aid can't discern truth.


Wow!! the half witted arrogance spewed by some on this site typing away from their moms basement may be more disturbing than the "truth"


I should point out that personal attacks are not permitted on ATS.

I thought your thread was "Is Glenn Beck "uncovering" the "Conspiracy" of the Millenium?"

Guess I didn't realize that you only wanted those who said YES to respond.

..........
............
.............



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 02:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Stormdancer777
I have posted information on Strong several times on this forum and others.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 033131p://bSaturday2010 by Stormdancer777]


Though as always none of these people go far enough. Maruice Strong runs the Janus Fund. That is his global investment group.

Janus? Where have I heard that name before? Oh yest the Roman God of Commerce and Business.

As usual all Roads actually lead to Rome, though as usual, all the people who want to save us, seem to stop on that road, far short of Rome.

I wonder why that is.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 02:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by romanmel
A little caution to the Glenn Beck groupies may be in order here.

He claimed the Popular Mechanics story to be final proof that 9-11 was not an inside job. He thus silenced and marginalized all 9-11 truthers who thought he was going to be the "great hope" for enlightenment of the "main-stream".

Beck can be counted on to do the same co-intel job on those he claims to represent now in his so-called investigation. IMO Beck is a pawn to TPTB New World Order crowd...


Looking at this quote, I'd say you are in fact saying that because he does not agree with the truthers he is wrong about everything else. In fact you call him a "pawn" of the NWO, do you not.

Or, have you changed your position suddenly. If so, what is your NEW reason?

[edit on 5/16/2010 by Blaine91555]



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 02:25 PM
link   
reply to post by SpectreDC
 


Just went and checked your posts, as you suggested.

I found the following OPINIONS:
"beck is a shill and shouldn't be trusted"
"it's Glenn Beck, proceed with caution"
"he works for the corporate media"
"the Glenn Beck show is coming off the air soon"



This is getting repetitive- WHERE is YOUR EVIDENCE? What do you have to refute him?
And to the OP - your very welcome.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 02:27 PM
link   
I see a number of people saying Beck is "on the inside", but not one person offering examples of why this is the case.

Why does success bring such hostility? My opinion is that if Beck is right and he helps people figure these issues out and do what is best for themselves and their families then he is doing the right thing.

I watched the video's and found them informative. I don't care who the messenger is - if the message helps me then I will use the information.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 02:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by romanmel
reply to post by Blaine91555
 


You sure read a lot into what I said, that I did not say. I think they call that dis-info.

I don't care what you or anyone else want to believe about Glenn Beck.

I meerly stated for the good of those who haven't already "drank the Glenn Beck Kool Aid", my observations of his past manipulations.

I'm fully aware some "fans" find that dishartening...


To remind you what the previous post was about where you clearly play down your own words.

I'm not a Beck fan however. I just don't like the logic where people manipulate like this. Your earlier post was very clear. Don't agree with the Truthers, your in cahoots with the NWO and everything you say is "dis-info".

I don't agree with the Truthers. I'm not in a conspiracy with the NWO. I'm not a Beck fan. So you see where assuming such things gets you.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 02:31 PM
link   
I'll tell you what. To be fair to myself, I'm going to spend this week researching Beck, what he says and whether he backs his stuff up with facts. I've been curious about that anyway. When I first heard him bash both the Left and the Right at the same time, it caught my attention. I guess its time to be honest and check him out.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 02:34 PM
link   
reply to post by I_am_Spartacus
 


Glenn Beck's broadcast = conspiracy theory for morons. I won't get that time back again but at least I can say that I know for sure that he's a shill. I like the way that he waved it in front of the viewers' nose - sometimes "they" pay trusted people to pass on disinformation! Yep and Glenn Beck is your proof.

For any of his viewers with a brain, please switch off the cable TV and start doing some real research. The rest of you, just make some popcorn and enjoy the show until the lights go out.

(Hint - the redistribution of wealth is a fact but it's not going from the rich to the poor )



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 02:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler

Originally posted by Stormdancer777
I have posted information on Strong several times on this forum and others.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 033131p://bSaturday2010 by Stormdancer777]


Though as always none of these people go far enough. Maruice Strong runs the Janus Fund. That is his global investment group.

Janus? Where have I heard that name before? Oh yest the Roman God of Commerce and Business.

As usual all Roads actually lead to Rome, though as usual, all the people who want to save us, seem to stop on that road, far short of Rome.

I wonder why that is.



The Club of Rome

www.clubofrome.org...

I was thinking about you, thanks for pointing out the Janus Fund, I don't know much about it.



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 02:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by alttracks
reply to post by SpectreDC
 



I found the following OPINIONS:
"beck is a shill and shouldn't be trusted"
"it's Glenn Beck, proceed with caution"
"he works for the corporate media"
"the Glenn Beck show is coming off the air soon"


I appreciate you taking things out of context. You're surely making your case.

The first is simple fact; he has changed his views constantly throughout the years, coincidentally when he gets a new employer or a new market.

The second should be the rule of thumb for anyone in corporate media. Why should I trust someone who works for corporate media, which propagates ideas for certain reasons? Where was Beck when Bush was in office and revealing everything Bush did? Where was Fox News? Oh wait, they were supporting Bush. The same guy who created executive orders and pushed forward acts completely unconstitutional, that still exist to this day.

The third....wait, why do I need to prove that he works for Fox News...I mean, he does. That's a no brainier. Asking for evidence on this? Good way to show your credibility.

And the fourth, as I said, is taken out of context. I'll let you yourself to reread the post and actually put this one together.


This is getting repetitive- WHERE is YOUR EVIDENCE? What do you have to refute him?


I'm not trying to refute him. I'm trying to figure out the reasons why Fox News is revealing this information. This would be clear to you if you could read, and considering your inability to understand context, something you should work on a little harder.

Again, why do you trust corporate spin machines? Why is it because Beck is revealing something truthful that this makes him the messiah for truth seekers? I don't trust Beck, people shouldn't trust any talking head on the TV, and because of the medias responsibility of being a tool of TPTB, I don't understand why it is so hard to question the reasoning of why they are revealing it.

If you respond to this post asking again for "evidence" of something I'm not trying to put forward, I'm putting you on ignore. Because you're either a troll who is just trying to waste my time, or you're an idiot who can't read what I post. If you decide to finally understand that I'm not refuting what Beck is bringing forward, but I'm trying to figure out the reasoning for his action, feel free to respond.

[edit on 16-5-2010 by SpectreDC]



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 03:04 PM
link   
Maurice Strong

Source watch,


His current appointments include: [1]

* Under-Secretary General and Special Advisor to the Secretary-General, United Nations
* Special Advisor to the Administrator of the United Nations Development Programme
* Chairman, Earth Council Institute
* Chairman, International Advisory Board, CH2M Hill Group Inc.
* Director, Foundation Board, World Economic Forum
* Director, The Human Society of the United States
* Member, Toyota International Advisory Board
* Director, Zenon Environmental Inc.
* Advisory Council, LEAD International [2]

Past appointments include:

* Special Advisor to the President, World Bank
* 1998-2001 Mamber International Advisory Board, Federation of Korean Industry
* 1992-1995 Chairman, Ontario Hydro
* 1992 Secretary General, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
* 1985-1986 Executive Coordinator, United Nations Office for Emergency Operations in Africa
* 1983-1987 Member World Commission on Environment and Development
* 1976-1978 President, Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee, Petro-Canada
* 1973-1975 Executive Director, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya
* 1970-1972 Secretary-General, United Nations Conference on the Human Environment
* 1970-1972, 1976-1980, Chairman, Board of Governors, International Development Research Centre, Membmer of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum
* 1966-1970 Headed Canada's International Development Assistance Program as Director-General of the External Aid Office, and later as President and Chairman of the Board of the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA)
* 1966-1970 Alternate Governor for Canada- International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), and the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB), Chairman, Bureau of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

"After the Earth Summit, Strong continued to take a leading role in implementing the results of Rio through establishment of the Earth Council, the Earth Charter movement, his Chairmanship of the World Resources Institute, Membership on the Board of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, the Stockholm Environment Institute, the African-American Institute, the Institute of Ecology in Indonesia, the Beijer Institute of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, and others. Strong was a longtime Foundation Director of the World Economic Forum, a Senior Advisor to the President of the World Bank, a Member of the International Advisory of Toyota Motor Corporation, the Advisory Council for the Center for International Development of Harvard University, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, the World Conservation Union (IUCN), the World Wildlife Fund, Resources for the Future, and the Eisenhower Fellowships." [3]

"Mr. Strong founded the Earth Council in 1992 after the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, and is now extending that leadership with a new mandate to unite local councils and affiliated organizations under the Earth Council Alliance with co-founder Tommy E. Short.

"In addition, he is currently spending much of his time in China in his role as advisor to government, business and United Nations organizations. He also is a special advisor to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, as well as chairman of the council, University for Peace, affiliated with United Nations...

"Earlier in his career Mr. Strong served in investment and senior management positions with corporations in the energy and financial sectors. He was president of the Power Corporation of Canada before leaving in 1966 to head Canada’s External Aid Office, later reorganized as the Canadian International Development Agency.

"Mr. Strong returned to Canada as president, chairman and CEO of Petro-Canada (1976-78). He served as Chairman of the International Energy Development Corporation from 1980 to 1983 and of the Canada Development Investment Corporation from 1982 to 1984." [4]


www.sourcewatch.org...



posted on May, 16 2010 @ 03:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by I_am_Spartacus

Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by I_am_Spartacus
 


Exactly...but at least he admits he's a comedian...unlike Beck


Uhhh ok....................so you're agreeing your news source is bogus, thanks.

And no, Stewart repeatedly admits he is a clown, that doesn't mean he isn't reporting facts.




Right back at you



new topics

top topics



 
53
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join