The real reason why Saddam Huessian was killed.

This is my belief on the reason why Saddam Huessian "صدام حسين عبد المجيد التكريتي" was taken out of power of Iraq and then killed. Many of you probably don't know Saddam Huessian was a member of the Ba'ath Party. The Ba'ath party is a secularist Arab nationalism/Pan-Arabism political party opposed to Western imperialism and calling for the "renaissance" or "resurrection" of the Arab World and its unity in one united state. It's motto "Unity, Liberty, Socialism" (wahda, hurriya, ishtirakiya) — refers to Arab unity, freedom from non-Arab control and interference, and Arab socialism rather than to European socialism, or communism. Now America and Israel was never going to let Saddam Hussian influnce neighbor nations in joining him and uniting as one. No, Israel's safety is very valuable to America. Because without Israel there would be no need for the West in the Middle East. Now knowing the true Saddam Huessian we can see he was never associated with Al-Queda. Now I know we never found nuclear weapons. But the real weapon of mass destruction was Saddam Huessian himself. Look at Iraq with him in charge and look at it now. Tell me who was more terrible. Saddam Huessian or the U.S occupation. People wake up and learn the corporations are really in charge of this country and chose your freedom!!

[edit on 14-5-2010 by Romantic_Rebel]

Hi there

I am an Iraqi living in the UK, Now i agree with you that the invasion was not to liberate the iraqi people although thats what we were told, but i think it did more good than bad. sure there was security before the invasion, but there was no freedom, and i wouldnt trade security for freedom at any time.

you are however right, the only reason the USA is in the middle east is to protect israel. thats the only reason and the zionist are crazy about prophecies and fulfilling them

and i would like you to watch this documentary and not forget what saddam hussein did:

He was killed because he was an egotist and "poked the bear" one too many times. He played the dangerous game of boasting about his power for his neighbors while raising the concerns of the west at the same time, and quite frankly took it too far. Plus really he deserved to be held responsible for his atrocities, he got off alot easier than many of his victims. Good riddance.

I think Saddam was killed because he tried to assassinate Bush senior and Bush junior is a vengeful cowboy.
The US is interested in oil and that is why they are in the middle east. Israel is important only if it plays a part in US getting oil.

He was a horrible man, but he was executed so quickly because it would not do to put him on trial fro all his crimes and have Western (CIA) conplicity exposed. He was silenced.

That said, he is not missed

Yes he did do many terrible crimes. But haven't the U.S and Israel did worse around the world? To me yes! I'm not anti-American and anti-Semitic. Don't play that blame game with me.

Originally posted by Romantic_Rebel
Yes he did do many terrible crimes. But haven't the U.S and Israel did worse around the world? To me yes! I'm not anti-American and anti-Semitic. Don't play that blame game with me.

Name me a country that hasn't done terrible crimes throughout it's history. Evil is the part of human nature we all fight against, some lose the fight. Worse or better is entirely relative to your position. The sooner we realize we are all in this together and that we all lose when we treat each other badly the better off we will all be.

reply to post by slane69


You're correct! Every nation is the same down to the last detail. One might have more money or one might have more people. It's all about how people run the country.

Originally posted by Romantic_Rebel
Yes he did do many terrible crimes. But haven't the U.S and Israel did worse around the world? To me yes! I'm not anti-American and anti-Semitic. Don't play that blame game with me.

Just the US and Israel have only done worse, huh?

I think everyone has good points. I think it was because Saddam was a dick and the UN was tired of taking his crap for so many years. I think Bush was pissed off that he tried to kill his dad, and believe the crappy intel about Iraq as a chance to get some payback.

Saddam Huessian is not innocent here. He knew what he did in the past. Same with Adolf Hitler.

Tell em about the petra dollars

Originally posted by slane69
He was killed because he was an egotist and "poked the bear" one too many times. He played the dangerous game of boasting about his power for his neighbors while raising the concerns of the west at the same time, and quite frankly took it too far. Plus really he deserved to be held responsible for his atrocities, he got off alot easier than many of his victims. Good riddance.

Are you talking about GW Bush or sadam because to be frank with you the gap seems very small in what you are saying.

Sorry i'm off hill walking now.

Sorry got to put these two posts togeather and make the link

"I think Bush was pissed off that he tried to kill his dad"

"Saddam Huessian is not innocent here. He knew what he did in the past. Same with Adolf Hitler."

Well it's a bloody good job he didn't try to kill grandad bush because he was trading with the enermy during WWII, thats Hittler to you and me and never mind jed bush was in was a directory on the firm that providing security for the twin towers on 9/11 and thats the day after congress was informed a whopping $2.2tr was missing.

Think i'm wrong then prove it.

Originally posted by Romantic_Rebel
Tell me who was more terrible. Saddam Huessian or the U.S occupation. People wake up and learn the corporations are really in charge of this country and chose your freedom!!

[edit on 14-5-2010 by Romantic_Rebel]

So having his son's rape women, entertaining himself with throwing his countrymen feet first into wood chippers, video taping his people as they climb a set of stairs blindfolded, over the edge of a eight story building, and gassing whole villages of people, is OK with you?
Oh, I'm sorry, I see that this is all Bush's fault (sarcasm).

[edit on 14-5-2010 by Violater1]

“But haven't the U.S and Israel did worse around the world? To me yes! I'm not anti-American and anti-Semitic. Don't play that blame game with me.”

Originally posted by Romantic_Rebel
Saddam Huessian is not innocent here. He knew what he did in the past. Same with Adolf Hitler.

So your comparing the USA with Adolf Hitler, who murdered six Million Jews?
Really?
Really!

reply to post by Violater1


No it's not all of Bush's fault. You seem to be a conservative.

reply to post by Violater1


No, I'm not comparing Adolf Hitler to the U.S. You must be mistaking my comment.

reply to post by Romantic_Rebel


I heard most of what you stated back in 92-93 by a retired pastor. He told me back then that the NWO would have him killed as he was nationalist and would withhold oil from the west.

I guess he was ultimately proven true.

I would say the US is responsible for far more deaths then the nazi regime.

It seems the nazi regime was funded by Americans. Apparently the US helped Saddam in power.

Maybe it's time to forget about the 6 million jews that were killed.
This number is dwarfed by the number of casualties from other parties.

It also seems that there is reason to believe this number is a little exaggerated.

Why was Hussein killed? Well, to understand that you first need to learn a little history courtesy of Mr. Greg Palast:

www.truthout.org...

So you see, the world's largest oil companies had already paid big time money to own portions of Iraq's oil fields and had mutually decided to supress Iraqi oil production way before Saddam came on the scene. By the time 1972 rolled around Saddam was the latest ruler of the oil companies "pressure valve". That was the year that OPEC decided to put the squeeze on the West by raising the price of a barrel of oil from $3 to $22 and the Energy Crisis was born! It was to ultimately cost then President Jimmy Carter his job. As it turns out it also cost the oil companies a whole lot more. Saddam Hussein announced that he was nationalizing the oil fields of Iraq and promptly seized all the oil equipment and drove the corporate minions out. It is my belief that it was this decision that signed his own death warrant.

Over his remaining years Saddam tried in vain the actually increase Iraq's oil output beyond the meager allowance that OPEC and Big Oil had imposed upon the country, but it was tough going. The manufacturers of oil drilling equipment refused to sell him replacement parts for his existing oil rigs and the construction of new ones was out of the question. Embargos went even further to hamper his attempts at boosting production and boosting his personal wealth. Finally, in 1990, Saddam made his final blunder and invaded Kuwait.

There are many theories as to why Saddam chose to do this. It is my belief that it was an "end run", a desperate attempt on his part to finally achieve a substantial increase in oil production. In Kuwait it was all "Drill Baby, Drill", and the seizure of their many oil wells pumping at peak capacity must have surely been a tempting target for Ol' Saddam. Unfortunately, this was the act that allowed the mass media to finally cement the notion of Saddam as a power-mad and murderous tyrant into the minds of the West.

It took a long time but, eventually, with an "oil man" in the White House and in control of America's vast military machine, and with the help of that curiously timed "terrorist" attack in New York and D.C., the oil companies were able to convince the American people to invade Iraq for them, gain control of the oil fields once again and pay Saddam back for his betrayal. There exist upon this planet, a long list of organizations that you do not want to "F" with and the oil companies are very high up on that list.

I know this is an odd comparison but I always think about Laurence of Arabia the movie when I think about the middle east. How Laurence tried to unite the people and after he got them all together in the end all the tribes were sitting around the table bickering and yelling.

He was hoping they would come together but instead they were all fighting and arguing and he just sat there and he realized not everyone wants the same thing. He fought with them and in the end handed everything to them with a bow on top and they still could not come together.

There is allot of strong beliefs in the middle east and the death of Saddam was a good thing in that he was a murdering dog that gassed his people. In the end no matter what we do they don't want to live like Americans. What is good for us is not good for them.