It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

7.7 Earthquake predicted to hit Southern California

page: 1
3
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 14 2010 @ 12:55 AM
link   


7.7 Earthquake prediction for Southern California before the weekend is over

Freedom of speech can go a very long way, however with false reporting in Earthquake prediction can one be held accountable?

Luke Thomas, a resident from Jupiter, Florida, has a site called QuakePrediction.com. His site attempts to predict Earthquakes based on fault friction due to heating of the surface.

Thomas was debunked by ABC7 in Los Angeles as he made a prediction that failed no more than a month ago.

Now he predicts a major earthquake around 7.7 magnitude to strike 100 miles around San Bernardino, California before the weekend is over.

Thomas runs ads on his Web site. The driving reason he does this is so his ads can make money. TheWeatherSpace.com would not like to contribute to this scheme, however there is no choice but to put this prediction in many eyes to see what happens.

Rainbow clouds similar to what was seen over China and Chile before their major quakes were seen over the Los Angeles areas today. These clouds may or may not signal a quake as there is no evidence to support the theory, however people are keeping an eye on supplies.

Thomas' prediction came on May 9th, 2010. He says the most potent days for a quake of 7.7 magnitude would be May 14th through the 15th.

Do you think he is right, or a is "Luke a fluke"


www.theweatherspace.com...



Here is a link to the prediction site:
quakeprediction.com...



EARTHQUAKE WARNING; 7.2 to 8.2 (7.7) earthquake is possible in Southern California May 13-16. More likely to hit May 14-16. Most likely to hit within 100 miles of San Bernardino, CA.




Apparently it has something to do with Rainbow clouds that appeared before the Chile and China Quakes.



Rainbow similar to before China and Chile quake seen over Los Angeles

San Diego residents are reporting shaking continuing in the area. The shaking, according to the USGS, is likely due to the Easter quake this year which rocked the region.

Twitter is rolling with reports of rainbow cloud over Los Angeles today. Reports are coming in that this looks similar to before both the China and Chile quakes where residents reported and took photos of such events in the sky.

While no one can be sure what it means, people should always be prepared for a major Earthquake in Southern California as it is seismically active.

www.theweatherspace.com...



The best part of this prediction, we'll know if it comes true very very shortly. For now, I'll be listening to TOOL.

[edit on 14-5-2010 by Delphiki]

[edit on 14-5-2010 by Delphiki]

[edit on 14-5-2010 by Delphiki]

[Edit]Note: The guy who predicted this quake was already accused of being a hoaxer by the USGS when he predicted a large quake to hit LA about a month ago. Somehow a chain mail was started and caused some panic as it spread through social networking sites. Much like the author of the first article, I thought it important to expose this prediction to more eyes, as it will be easy to prove or disprove within a short amount of time. It has been stated numerous times by scientists that earthquakes are impossible to predict at specific dates and times, only the probability of an earthquake occurring in a particular region can be assessed.

[edit on 14-5-2010 by Delphiki]




posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Delphiki
 

Delphiki,

Rule of thumb, the more capitals there are in a title the less valid the thread is...


Fearmonger much??

Peace

PS: just for clarification, that single flag is not mine!!!

[edit on 14-5-2010 by operation mindcrime]



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by operation mindcrime
reply to post by Delphiki
 

Delphiki,

Rule of thumb, the more capitals there are in a title the less valid the thread is...


Fearmonger much??

Peace


You are talking about validity when responding to a thread in the prediction forum. Think much?

War



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:05 AM
link   
So if this doesn't happen can we use it as validation he is a phony?



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:05 AM
link   
Today is RV Day, i.e. Remote Viewing Day, the 9.2 mag quake in New Mexico prediction.
Where is it?
So much for RVs!

mclinking



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:06 AM
link   
reply to post by Delphiki
 


No....I am talking about all the capitals in the title of this thread.

Why??

Peace



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:08 AM
link   
4.0 2010/05/14 05:11:07 32.675 -115.873 6.1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
3.1 2010/05/14 04:55:34 32.669 -115.873 5.9 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
2.8 2010/05/14 04:13:16 32.699 -115.885 1.9 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

earthquake.usgs.gov...

These are the quakes for Southern California for the last couple of hours.(From around 9:00 p.m./Calif. time)

Just wanted to link this site for those who want to keep an eye on things!



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by Xtrozero
So if this doesn't happen can we use it as validation he is a phony?


He already predicted one that didn't happen according to the article. If something over 5.0 occurs this weekend, I would consider him more credible than I did prior. If nothing happens than I can assume his model for predicting quakes is bunk. He seemingly has confidence in it however, since he made it public. Who knows, maybe just another marketing ploy or maybe the real thing.... >> we'll find out in a few days.



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by operation mindcrime
reply to post by Delphiki
 


No....I am talking about all the capitals in the title of this thread.

Why??

Peace


If I hadn't used capitals you would have never posted. I'm glad you did, I do enjoy our dialogue. Welcome, any comments on the prediction?



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:24 AM
link   
Hmm I posted a thread about a CIA agent that claimed there would be an attack on the US may 14/15....maybe HAARP?
Well if it does happen and any member of my family is injured or worse that white house can expect a knock on the door...



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:26 AM
link   
Well, I suppose it could happen. I have heard a lot of "chatter" from friends of mine that an earthquake is supposed to hit Cali sometime in may, I heard this back in March so I have been watching to see if it happens. So far, nothing, but I am still watching.

I live on the pacific rim, so I have to keep an eye to even the most oddball earthquake prediction. Just to take it into concideration so as I am not caught totally unaware. I am expecting a large earthquake myself on the rim, it will happen.

I also know first hand that people sometimes can and do see things before they happen, so I pay close attention when this kind of information comes from more than one source.

Eventually there will be a really big earthquake in southern cali, will it happen soon, like this month? I'm watching. It is possible, as it will be 10 months from now.....



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:26 AM
link   
Freedom of speech can go a very long way, however with false reporting in Earthquake prediction can one be held accountable?


[edit on 14-5-2010 by Delphiki]

7.7 is still mild to alaskans.



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by ..5..
Freedom of speech can go a very long way, however with false reporting in Earthquake prediction can one be held accountable?


[edit on 14-5-2010 by Delphiki]


7.7 is still mild to alaskans.

The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any law "respecting an establishment of religion", impeding the free exercise of religion, infringing on the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by Delphiki
He already predicted one that didn't happen according to the article. If something over 5.0 occurs this weekend, I would consider him more credible than I did prior. If nothing happens than I can assume his model for predicting quakes is bunk. He seemingly has confidence in it however, since he made it public. Who knows, maybe just another marketing ploy or maybe the real thing.... >> we'll find out in a few days.



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by Delphiki
If I hadn't used capitals you would have never posted.


That makes sense...


I'm glad you did, I do enjoy our dialogue. Welcome, any comments on the prediction?


I'll give it a go.....I think the possibility of this prediction coming true should be ranked as a classic 50/50. Which really isn't predicting unless you consider calling a coin-flip correct as a successful prediction.

You do have the that weird eathquake cloud working for you so who knows. What better way to start the weekend then with imminent doom.


Rainbow similar to before China and Chile quake seen over Los Angeles

Peace



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by ..5..


7.7 is still mild to alaskans.


That's because there is nothing in Alaska to collapse.

I am currently near the predicted area so I'll keep you posted if anything happens. Of course a 7.7 may knock out power, most I've ever experienced was about a 5.


Rainbow Clouds Seen in LA Today (I feel sorry for the dude stuck in traffic)


You should never trust a leprechaun.

[edit on 14-5-2010 by Delphiki]

[edit on 14-5-2010 by Delphiki]

[edit on 14-5-2010 by Delphiki]



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:39 AM
link   
Could the rainbow clouds be formed due to a static charge buildup from tectonic friction?

I doubt it, but that won't stop me from posting this.



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:46 AM
link   
reply to post by JohnnyTHSeed
 


Science @ NASA, August 11, 2003
Nasa Science

"In one laboratory experiment, Freund and colleagues placed red granite blocks under a 1,500 ton press-mimicking in some ways what happens miles below the Earth's surface. A sensitive camera developed at JPL and GSFC monitored the rock and detected infrared emissions. Furthermore, a voltage built up on the rock's surface. This leads Freund to believe the cause might be electrical."

" What causes rocks under pressure to emit infrared radiation? No one is certain. The frequency spectrum of the emissions shows that internal heat from friction-e.g., rocks rubbing together-is not responsible for the radiation."

Don't know if that helps...

Peace



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Xtrozero
So if this /edit DOES OR/ doesn't happen /edit WILL ANYBODY GIVE A #?


My thoughts...



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 02:05 AM
link   
ALL CAPS...

Makes you cool.



new topics

top topics



 
3
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join