Originally posted by manta78
You are the one who posted it. That in itself subjects it to verification as much as the original video here that I posted.
So, because it came from me that is reason to question it?
Once again, can you make any argument about this subject without referring to me? It shows an utter shallowness of your thinking.
Originally posted by manta78
I am merely asking you on what basis, other than a blog post, do you believe the questions and answer session via email actually occured?
And I've already answered. Mr. Bryant's blog was the venue (it appears) through which this video was originally released. Therefore, being the same venue, being that Mr. Bryant has already served as a mouthpiece for Mr. McElroy and those behind his statement, I see no reason to doubt this conversation did not take place.
Do you have any reason to doubt it, other than I was the one posting the information and that it does not support your beliefs?
Originally posted by manta78
I will once again be reserving judgement of the information you have
provided, subject to verification of same.
Interesting at no point do you doubt Mr. McElroy's testimony, as evidenced in your first post...
Originally posted by manta78
Disclosure is coming people. Just one more sign of same.
But when a venue that has served as a mouthpiece for McElroy produces information that may be damaging, you all but declare that it didn't happen but based on what you will not say.
[edit on 19-5-2010 by DoomsdayRex]


