It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by anon72
3 experts insist White House answer new questions about documentation
Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state. In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama's earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice-cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.
Affidavits filed separately in a presidential eligibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia by Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels and Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson. The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.
The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049. "Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office," the Social Security website explains. "The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number."To verify the number was issued by the Social Security Administration for applicants in Connecticut, Daniels used a Social Security number verification database. She found that the numbers immediately before and immediately after Obama's were issued to Connecticut applicants between the years 1977 and 1979.
The question is being raised amid speculation about the president's history fueled by an extraordinary lack of public documentation. Along with his original birth certificate, Obama also has not released educational records, scholarly articles, passport documents, medical records, papers from his service in the Illinois state Senate, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption papers.
"There is obviously a case of fraud going on here," Daniels maintained. "In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly."
Source: www.wnd.com...
So, Conspriacy at it's finest. Personally, I think these people are off-probably due to what they preceive as Obama SS# etc. On the face and the way the article is presented, yes-they are on to something IF they are correct. The info about the database for SS#'s is correct-as far as I understand it when I use such things at work.
Be advised, this report is loaded with details. can get confusing it you don't stay with it to the Kicker at the end. Interesting.
That being said, anyone who knows of such S.S. things can elaborate on? Just more curious things pop up each week or so. Obama should be able to respond to this easily enough-if he has nothing to hide.
I have to say that all of these investigators must feel confident in their results/findings to put in court actions and also risk their professional reputations.
NOTE: I am not an expert on this subject. I just posted an article. Relax. If you have issues with the contents of the article, take it up with them.
when the cia got him the ssn, they just used a random state. whats the problem?
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Seriously y'all need your heads re-examined. He is not employing someone else's social as that is a felony and the DNC would not want anyone with a felony in their national ranks.
Could someone have misread a "9" as a "0"? It seems possible.
his CT SSN was due to a clerical error in the Baltimore SS headquarters. In 1975, SSN were issued based on the zip code of the return address. The President’s house in Hawaii was zip code 96814 and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Seriously y'all need your heads re-examined. He is not employing someone else's social as that is a felony and the DNC would not want anyone with a felony in their national ranks.
I found this speculative explanation for the CT SSN:
www.liquida.com...
Could someone have misread a "9" as a "0"? It seems possible.
his CT SSN was due to a clerical error in the Baltimore SS headquarters. In 1975, SSN were issued based on the zip code of the return address. The President’s house in Hawaii was zip code 96814 and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.
The only thing that seems strange about that explanation is, when they used that misread zip code to mail it back to him, it would have gone to Connecticut instead of to Hawaii, wouldn't it?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
Seriously y'all need your heads re-examined. He is not employing someone else's social as that is a felony and the DNC would not want anyone with a felony in their national ranks.
I found this speculative explanation for the CT SSN:
www.liquida.com...
Could someone have misread a "9" as a "0"? It seems possible.
his CT SSN was due to a clerical error in the Baltimore SS headquarters. In 1975, SSN were issued based on the zip code of the return address. The President’s house in Hawaii was zip code 96814 and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Allrighty then. Since I have an utter appreciation of the absurd, I spent a whole 5 minutes contemplating various simple, logical explanations. If it is in fact true that SSN#'s are issued based on origin of state from which one has applied, here is a brief comparison of strikingly similar zip codes from Conn. and Hawaii.
The inadvertent juxtaposition of the leading digit (0,9) could EASILY explain the discrepancy.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f08abcfc1a2c.jpg[/atsimg]
Zip Codes by State
Defense rests.
The only thing that seems strange about that explanation is, when they used that misread zip code to mail it back to him, it would have gone to Connecticut instead of to Hawaii, wouldn't it?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by kinda kurious
Good job!
I gave you a star!
I didn't read all 20 pages so I was wondering if someone might have posted this already...maybe they read ATS and got the idea from you!
But nobody answered my question about it getting mailed back to the wrong place if they used the wrong zip code.
edit on 6-4-2011 by Arbitrageur because: clarification
USPS maintains lists of all current addresses of every citizen of The USA and if someone screwed up and placed a zip code for CT for a letter meant for Hawaii it would send the doc to Hawaii as scheduled because the address would not match up.
Originally posted by dragonseeker
I see. So, the US government, in a fit of suicidal incompetence, decided that they would give the nuclear launch codes to someone who's identity they weren't sure about, and never checked. Makes perfect sense to me.
But, hey, don't let common sense get in the way of a good conspiracy theory. Carry on
And I’m sure you have proof of this. Can you post Obama’s step sister certificate of live birth, or a link to it?
Originally posted by 173abnbde
Obama's step-sister...from Indonesia, has the same type COLB
Got a source for this?
McCain was forced by Obama, and Clinton to display not only his certified birth certificate before the Senate in 2008, but also other historical records to verify his qualification to run for President of the United States.