posted on May, 13 2010 @ 06:34 PM
reply to post by mryanbrown
I'm not sure how her POSSIBLY being a homosexual could have any difference in her maybe being one of the judges on the bench if "don't ask, don't
tell" were to come up before the Court.
For instance, I am a staunch advocate of same sex marriage and the repeal of don't ask, don't tell. And I mean STAUNCH. But I'm straight. Never
even "experimented". So who's to say her sexual orientation, IF gay, has anything to do with her views?
If her possibly being lesbian and supporting same sex marriage is cause for concern then we should be equally worried if a straight person who opposes
it were selected for the bench. But we don't do that do we? No, we only discuss their position on the issue not their sex, race, religion, creed,
or sexual orientation.