It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DGFenrir
There are countles stellar bodies in the universe. They need to be yber advanced to be able to pinpoint our location. This reduces the odds of a contact even more.
Originally posted by blujay
They are right here.
There are countless numbers of craft with millions of 'off-Earthers' in our area at this time in history. Wouldn't you want to witness the end of a 26,000 year cycle of humans to see how it will turn out?
It's the Blockbuster of the millenia.
Originally posted by Oreyeon
I totally agree with you that sooner or later, whether by choice or necessity, that we as a species absolutely will expand out into the galaxy. We've shown throughout our species history that we're an expansionist species and that given the opportunity to do so, then we definitely will.
We aren't going to last that long. We will kill ourselves off before we can infect other worlds with our poisonous presence. Other civilizations haven't made their presence known to us for good reason. Why would they want to? We have nothing to offer them. We barely even have our humanity left to offer. We certainly can't offer peace. There's no profit in peace. We have nothing they want. UFO sightings? Humans are a spectator sport. They are taking bets on how we will kill each other.
Originally posted by tauristercus
Originally posted by McGinty
Thanks for your hard work on this excellent thread.
Please forgive me for picking bones, but why is this a paradox?
Fermi posits the idea that if the earth were not a freak and there were other inteligent life in the universe, then we'd see the evidence. A valid argument, but a straight forward one - not a paradox...!
Not picking bones at all but a valid question
Fermi was considering the probability of other technological civilizations developing within our galaxy over its 13 billion year existence as extremely high based on reasonable assumptions. The inescapable conclusion reached was that during the period of the galaxy's existence, thousands if not millions of technological civilizations would have had the time and opportunity to come into existence and eventually travel throughout and potentially colonize every suitable star system ... Fermi thought that evidence of the existence of these technological civilizations should have been every where you looked ... but in reality, there was no sign whatsoever that there had ever been any other civilizations in our galaxy besides ourselves.
To Fermi, this was a monumental paradox.
Originally posted by MasterJedi
reply to post by tauristercus
Just didn't see quarantine on your list and its always seemed the most likely...
Originally posted by SmokeandShadow
reply to post by tauristercus
I think the most frightening thought is that we are alone in the universe. What would that mean??? It would have deep theological implications, for sure.
Originally posted by nik1halo
Assuming that these species are more advanced than us, it is reasonable to assume that they have already mastered this technology, which is why we cannot detect it. No radio waves, means no noise.
Originally posted by Silicis n Volvo
Originally posted by SmokeandShadow
reply to post by tauristercus
I think the most frightening thought is that we are alone in the universe. What would that mean??? It would have deep theological implications, for sure.
sure but how arrogant do you have to be to believe we are alone here...can you times billions of trillions of galaxies by the trillions of stars in those galaxies by the trillions of trillions of planets around those stars and get a number? because i cant....how is earth the only one with life? its not.
why do aliens have to find us? the universe is huge they could easily overlook us.
Originally posted by tauempire
Or maybe you are wrong and we are alone....there is no arrogance here. Maybe we are just alone.....i know that might scare you.
I think maybe most of the people who believe in ET's problem is....they believe in ET so much that it almost become a religion to them.
Originally posted by Silicis n Volvo
Originally posted by tauempire
Or maybe you are wrong and we are alone....there is no arrogance here. Maybe we are just alone.....i know that might scare you.
I think maybe most of the people who believe in ET's problem is....they believe in ET so much that it almost become a religion to them.
why should it scare anyone? it makes no difference to my life if we are alone or not. im a firm believer in ET life if another race visited earth id just say "i told u so"
if they didnt id just say "oh well i didnt live to see it" but some lucky sole in the future will get to see it.
theres a big difference between belief in ET life and belief in a god...maths, science, physics and simple numbers all point towards there being ET life somewhere...other than an old book and a little faith there is nothing to prove a religion correct.
any person who believes earth is the only planet with life on it is self centerd.
life only has to be single celled organisms...that is ultimately where intelligent life stems from.
im very stubborn and pig headed when it comes to this subject in the way that ill gladly say...if you think we are alone in the universe then you are wrong! simples
[edit on 12-5-2010 by Silicis n Volvo]
Originally posted by univac500
Here is the Sagittarius Star Field photo.
What can we deduce from this photo? Nothing.
Originally posted by tauristercus
Originally posted by univac500
Here is the Sagittarius Star Field photo.
What can we deduce from this photo? Nothing.
You're absolutely right that the photo itself provides scant evidence by which we can determine the existence or non-existence of extraterrestrial civilizations potentially occupying our galaxy.
My intention in using that pic in my OP was to highlight the unimaginable and uncountable number of star systems just within our galaxy alone.
But even considering that mind-boggling view, the point that I'm trying to ram home is that given the age of our galaxy (approx 13 billion years), even that staggering amount of stars could conceivably be colonized by any technologically advanced civilization that had the means and the will to do so ... there would effectively be nothing to stop them doing so, especially if they were the 1st to develop technology.
It's been estimated that once the decision had been made, that such a civilization could colonize every suitable star system in less than 50 million years ... which is essentially a tiny fraction of the time that the galaxy has been in existence.
And because of the shear amount of time available, if not that civilization, then another, or another, or another, ....
So basically, there's no reason to expect or assume that given the opportunity and the means, that sooner or later at least one civilization would not make the effort to go forth and colonize ... making themselves, their technology, their artifacts and themselves ubiquitous throughout the entire galaxy.
Again ... where are they ?
[edit on 12/5/10 by tauristercus]