It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Rogue Bush Backers prepare Super 9/11 False Flag Terror Attacks

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 7 2004 @ 06:05 AM
link   
I found this article very interesting. Sounds very possible, it may be the reason the ships are being sent out for "training exercises"

Rogue Bush Backers prepare Super 9/11 False Flag Terror Attacks

INN Preview Exclusive -June 2

By Webster Griffin Tarpley

Toronto, May 30 – Intelligence patterns monitored over the US Memorial
Day weekend now point conclusively to an imminent new round of ABC
(atomic-bacteriological-chemical) terror attacks in the United States,
Great Britain, Canada, and possibly other nations. These attacks could
include nuclear detonations, radiological dirty bombs, poison gas and
other chemical weapons, or biological agents, to be unleashed in such
urban settings as New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington DC,
Vancouver BC, or London.

The goal of these operations would be to
produce a worldwide shock several orders of magnitude greater than the
original 9-11, with a view to stopping the collapse of the Bush
administration, the Wall Street-centered financial structures, and the
US-UK strategic position generally. The attacks would be attributed by
US/UK intelligence to controlled patsy terrorist groups who would be
linked by the media to countries like Iran, Syria, Cuba, or North
Korea.

The organizers of the attacks would in reality be substantially
the same secret command cell in the United States which set up the 9-11
events and its associated networks, which have been able to continue in
operation because of the abject failure of all 9-11 investigations to
date to identify them....

Click to continue




posted on Jun, 7 2004 @ 08:24 AM
link   
Although this piece appears well conceived and well written,
there are points difficult to discern between being quoted or being speculated.

From a side-glance found at Bushwatch,
I gather the author has had that problem before:

The most frequently cited and circulated source of Bush-Nazi investigations/conspiranoia, George Bush-The Unauthorized Biography (a biography of George Herbert Walker Bush) by Webster Griffin Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin, published in 1992, while well-documented, is also the most suspect. The problem is that Tarpley and Chaitkin are colleagues of the political cult leader Lyndon LaRouche. Not surprisingly, they insist on overlaying otherwise solidly researched data with wildly speculative interpretations.

Despite this particular weakness, there may be some merit to the concept.
I prefer to believe that none of these conspiracies are conscious.
If you could interrogate each one of the actors one at a time,
you would discover they act in concert without conscious knowledge of it.
The 'conspiracy' is manipulated by memes, not men.
And, as such, the actors themselves are blissfully ignorant of how they are being played.

The naval movements are probably what they are billed to be, however.
The price of being anything else is too high.
Besides, they need to be back in port by September 29 to support Martial Law.



posted on Jun, 7 2004 @ 04:27 PM
link   
The World's Policeman

The Unites States has just put in motion what is called the "Regional Maritime Security Initiative". President Bush announced the establishment of the Proliferation Security Initiative which would result in the creation of international agreements and partnerships that would allow the US and its allies to search planes and ships carrying suspect cargo and seize illegal weapons or missile technologies.

The Navy’s, Pacific Command has undertaken and begun one of the most ambitious and complicated ventures in the war on terrorism as it seeks to prevent seaborne terrorist and criminal assaults on nations bordering the Pacific and Indian oceans. Called the Regional Maritime Security Initiative, it is intended to prevent terrorists from seizing a vessel(s).

The U.S.’s Regional Maritime Security Initiative (RMSI), the forming of a regional peacekeeping force, and the expected entrance of Pakistan into the ARF. In spite of Washington’s attempt to allay regional fears by stating that RMSI is open for change and accommodating to regional desires, the press reaction was mixed. While some welcomed the proposal, Indonesian Foreign Ministry spokesman, Marty Natelegawa, stated that the ‘proposal is one that should be initiated and led by countries in the region.’ Malaysia’s decision to host a maritime security seminar later this year will provide all parties another opportunity to discuss the future of RMSI.

So in other words, the USA has unilaterally undertaken using its Navy to patrol the waterways (first in the waters of S.E. Asia) to stop and search the ships of foreign nationals with the pretext of searching for WMD and fighting the war on terrorism.

I had always been under the impression such an act was technically an ‘act of war’.

But I guess those “treaties” Bush spoke of were mere formalities; that the misunderstanding Rummy speaks of is the ignorance of those who do not understand that “might makes right” and the “ends justify the means”.

Remember 2000 Bush Campaign for the Presidency. Did he not promise that the US would not be the World’s Policeman?

But of course this must be different, I wonder what, as they say in French - crottin de b¯uf – they will concoct.

www.nytimes.com...
quote.bloomberg.com...
www.buenosairesherald.com...
www.globalsecurity.org...



new topics
 
0

log in

join