Planet X Theory Possibly Falling Apart - if so then other theories also falling apart, page 1

Originally posted by kyateLaBoca
BYRD, I think you wrong about a few things. Go to www.Xfacts.com. First of all, I know that the sumerians have said they were used by the annanaki to do manuel labor.

Kayte... I was translating from the Original Sumerian Cuneiform Texts for you. Yes, I can read some Sumerian cuneiform.

Really.

Yes, those are links to the real texts.

Whatever the reason behind those android beings, it has been speculated that those android beings may be the Greys, but again thats only theory and thats what I was trying to point out.

It doesn't say androids. The Sumerians wrote 'Man'. Human. Lu. Homo Sapiens.

Then you talk about the sumerians discovering only 6 planets and contradict the idea that they knew about 10 planets. Why then would researchers such as Zecharis Sitchen, Jason Martell, and many more say that they knew about 10 planets.

There's astronomical observatories in Babylon and Nineveh, and the only planets they list were Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn.
www.ramtops.demon.co.uk...

www.gatewaystobabylon.com... They had excellent math and could predict most eclipses.

They dont just make this up.

Beg to differ, here, but they do. It sells books for them.

You seem to contradict what many of the experts say. Zecharis sitchen along with others have actually went back and looked into the so called myth pile of the sumerians and examined all their claims of the Annanaki and the planets.

I think it would be terribly unkind if I said Sitchin is an expert only in his own mind... but that really is the way I feel. What I'm saying is what people with PhDs in archaeology and Middle Eastern studies say and what astronomers all over the world say. The ones who are the loudest debunkers of Sitchin are not "jealous" people; they're folks who live there, who have dug up the cities and work with museums and artifacts (Sitchin hasn't, to the best of my knowledge), and people who can walk into a room full of tablets and start reading them just as you would read the newspaper.

Sitchin does not read Sumerian. He is a reporter who decided to read the Bible and proclaim himself a Biblical scholar (and if you think I'm harsh, you should hear what the Biblical Hebrew scholars have to say!)

But myth or not, they have said that the sumerians claimed to know about 10 planets.

Only Sitchin and his crew have. Everyone else says Sitchin is mistaken.

Then you talk about astronomers nixing the idea that there is something pulling on pluto in the 1940's. Why then would Zecharis Sitchen(an astronomer)

He's not an astronomer. He's a former newspaper reporter.

... along with many more astronomers be looking for such a planet and still make claims that there is something pulling on pluto.

The real astronomers are the ones debunking this Planet X and they are the ones saying that better observations accounted for the apparent anomalies.
www.badastronomy.com...

You can see just how much of a fraud they think he is in the Planet X discussion section (many of these folks are real astronomers):
www.badastronomy.com...

Then you talk about what planet X is by saying its most likely a brown dwarf star

I was replying to someone else's comment. And I think the idea of a brown dwarf star is pure nonsense.

How do you even know its degree of illumination and the ease with which it can be found considering that we havent even found it! Its only a theory. I've heard of it being a burnt out neutron star, but again thats only a theory, just like it being a brown dwarf. There are also many conspiracies with NASA on this issue, but I said before go to www.xfacts.com.

Well, we know this because we know how bright brown dwarfs are and how bright nutron stars are and how much mass they have. Furthermore, we know that they're good sources of radiation.
chandra.harvard.edu...

Trust me -- these aren't hard calculations. Anyone with a good calculator and the right set of questions can easily calculate out the gravitational well. It doesn't take an Einstein (or I couldn't do it!)

and even if the Australopithecenes would have seen this so called brown dwarf, they'd be too stupid to coment on it.

Oh, I dunno. We homo sapiens tend to think of non-humans (and humans and humanoids from earlier ages) as being nearly brain-dead vegetables, in spite of considerable evidence that animals are quite aware of nature, and in spite of the evidence of sophistication by early people. Can't be proved either way, but I think they would have certainly noticed something like that.