It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
the first photo however is not that of a DC-10 as you claimed; it is a 757 radio remotely flown crash test preformed by Boeing;
Originally posted by MolecularPhD
"How does a craft weighting 220,000 lbs with a wing span of 124 feet; made of component parts most of which are virtually indestructibly ;make such a small hole in the Pentagon; and leave nothing behind to conclusively identify it as a 757?" or for that matter that it was flight 77?
most of which are virtually indestructibly
Originally posted by MolecularPhD
This is a photo of the plane you are talking about (notice the nose cone)
This is a photo of a 757 notice the nose cone.
Originally posted by MolecularPhD
I can only speak for myself; as one who has spent a whole lot of time in those same shadows you are speaking of; not everything that appears kosher is.
Respectfully
MolecularPHD
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
What do you mean, "you'll be contacting them"? You made the claim that some explosives create black smoke while others create white smoke. You're telling me you made the claim without investigating to see whether it was even true yet?
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
...and you STILL evade the point- if not all floors required controlled demolitions, then it necessarily means than none of the floors required controlled demolitions.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
where substancial damage from the impact and the subsequent fires
Originally posted by Six Sigma
There you have it folks. Another truther that will ignore someone that shows them facts.
Originally posted by jthomas
Yesterday, you could not even support your claims about "explosive squibs". It was easy to show that you really had not done any research at all:
Originally posted by jthomas
It's quite remarkable that a photographer hired to take pictures of demolitions and do brochures can become a "demolition expert"
Originally posted by jthomas
I guess real demolition experts who would ever buy into "controlled demolition of the WTC towers" are in really short supply.
Originally posted by pteridine
We have a photographer and hanger-on stating his opinions.
Originally posted by pteridine
Squibs are back in the picture
Originally posted by iamcpc
Why do people like bonez chose to ignore the evidence that points away from demolition
Originally posted by GenRadek
BoneZ, I enjoy that photo of the democharges cutting that coal conveyor belt. All that coal dust.
Originally posted by Six Sigma
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
I do not know how he was verified. You are more than welcome to contact AE911T or KPFA radio and ask them how Sullivan was verified.
Stacey Loizeaux from CDI was contacted and has admitted that she KNOWS him. Tom went to high school with Doug Loizeaux. He is a freelance still photographer. He worked on a corporate brochure for the company and tagged along on a few jobs to get still images for it.
Mr. Sullivan's opinions on 9/11 are just that. He is not a qualified demolitions expert or a Structural Engineer. He is riding the coat tails of other frauds like Richard Gage and DRG.
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
I Know I'm going to get flamed for this and that's fine. I'm just asking an innocent question and hope for a constructive answer:
Let's say if the OS is indeed true, isn't it possible that explosives in the World Trade Center buildings were planted by Muslim terrorists and not by Agents who work for the government like many 9/11 truthers believe. (At least that's what I'd imagine they'd believe in)
Once again, I'm just asking. Thank you!
[edit on 9-5-2010 by GorehoundLarry]
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by daddymax
Or there is ABSOLUTELY no proof that a plane hit the pentagon, be it Cessna, Boeing, or Hot Wheels for that matter.
There's no proof that the moon exists, either. But if you can prove the moon's existence, a "cash reward of $100,000 has been offered to anyone who can send us, by e-mail, conclusive physical evidence of the existence of the moon. This reward remains unclaimed."
www.revisionism.nl...
Go for it.
Originally posted by jthomas Yesterday, you could not even support your claims about "explosive squibs". It was easy to show that you really had not done any research at all
: I actually have: Text
Originally posted by dragnet53
LOL this is why I despise skeptics! You can have all the proof and they still deny it! This is why we are a failed species!
Something this big comes out and oh he has no "true" credentials!
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by jthomas
Yesterday, you could not even support your claims about "explosive squibs". It was easy to show that you really had not done any research at all:
I actually have:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by jthomas
It's quite remarkable that a photographer hired to take pictures of demolitions and do brochures can become a "demolition expert"
Photographers don't need licenses to handle explosives. It doesn't come close to shocking that you would leave out the important part the he was also an explosives tech with a license to handle explosives from the FDNY.
Originally posted by jthomas
I guess real demolition experts who would ever buy into "controlled demolition of the WTC towers" are in really short supply.
Not so much:
demolitionexpertsquestion911.blogspot.com...
Originally posted by daddymax
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by daddymax
Or there is ABSOLUTELY no proof that a plane hit the pentagon, be it Cessna, Boeing, or Hot Wheels for that matter.
There's no proof that the moon exists, either. But if you can prove the moon's existence, a "cash reward of $100,000 has been offered to anyone who can send us, by e-mail, conclusive physical evidence of the existence of the moon. This reward remains unclaimed."
www.revisionism.nl...
Go for it.
Go outside at night
look up...done
Originally posted by NightGypsy
BoneZ has proven his credibility with posts that have research behind them. The closer we get to the day the betrayers of this country are revealed for what they are, the more absurd your arguments become.
Originally posted by MolecularPhD
If asking for a logical explanation to the questions I have posed makes me paranoid; "WOW" there would be a lot of people in this country that are paranoid for thinking? According to certain people posting in this thread we should all just except what is sold to us by the power's to be; and if we do not suspend logical thought in order to do so, we are categorized as "PARANOID CONSPIRACY THEORISTS" which I am far from being.