Lucifer = Planet Venus, not Satan - PROOF, page 12


Pages: <<  9    10    11    12  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 64 times


reply posted on 14-2-2012 @ 01:59 PM by Evildead
reply to post by BeastMaster2012



The devil's in the details.

Sounds plausible to me. Great thread!


reply posted on 15-2-2012 @ 09:21 AM by blocula
reply to post by BeastMaster2012

The templar knights were a religious military order formed in the 12th century,they built "churches" in denmark,italy,england,france and romania.If you connect them together by drawing a line,they actually form a perfectly shaped "Pentagram"...

And now realize that the man made structures and landmarks in washington.dc also form a "Pentagram'...

Just as the orbits of venus and earth do,as you so brilliantly revealed...

Then realize that venus was a comet that entered into our solar system,was slowed down by the earth and then was captured and held into its present orbit by the sun...

But was it by accident,or was it by design?

Now all we have to do is put those pieces together to realize whats really going on in this world...

www.cuttingedge.org...

www.templarhistory.com...
edit on 15-2-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-2-2012 @ 09:44 AM by BeastMaster2012
reply to post by blocula



I don't know much about comets or meteroids, but let's say around 5000 years ago this happened, Venus is supposedly huge, almost exactly the same size as the Earth and is in a perfectly round shape. After a collision, could this huge object form such a shape in a short period of time?

I believe that earth and Venus are locked into some weird relationship and if they collided at some point that would make sense, it's just hard to see Venus forming in such a small period of time. You would think that a huge portion of it would be gone. Also it seems like Venus once had life on it, or atleast water and mountains. It just seems like Venus has been around for a very long time.

I would love to believe that, and it would fit into why the mayans called the beginning of this last cycle to be the "birth of Venus".


reply posted on 20-2-2012 @ 09:58 AM by blocula
reply to post by BeastMaster2012

Thats just it,there was no collision between the earth and venus,just a close pass by from venus,whos gravitational attraction was near enough to tilt the earths axis a little,but more than enough to send massive tsunamis across large sections of the continents,also causing earthquakes,volcanic eruptions and bizarre lightning interactions between earth and the rogue comet venus...

Thats the origin of our myths and legends of the flood,the ancient deluge that just about every country has told about for thousands of years and its also the origin of our myths and legends of titanic battles and cosmic struggles in the earth,on the earth and in the sky between the gods and godesses...

People the world over who witnessed this all happening back then,who lived to tell about it and who passed the memories of it down to their children,would have thought their gods and godesses were at war and very angry...

edit on 20-2-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-2-2012 @ 10:26 AM by St Udio
reply to post by blocula



...Plato,born in 428 bc,pre-dates the New Testament and some of the re-writes of the Old Testament and he wrote in his work called Timaeus...

"First,there was the Moon in the orbit nearest the Earth and next the Sun,in the second orbit above the Earth. Then came the "morning star" and the star sacred to Hermes,moving in orbits which have an equal swiftness with the Sun,but in an opposite direction ...





was Plato correct. that 'Hermes' and 'Morning Star' moved in opposite directions...

on the face of it, it seems Plato is in error in his observation, because both 'Hermes'=mercury
and 'Morning Star'=venus orbit the Sun in the same direction, as with all of the inner rocky planets


but here's the weird thing... was Plato referring to the orbit direction of Morning Star (venus)
or was he being occultist, cryptic in stating that the Morning Star (venus) rotated in an opposite direction?



RE: cseligman.com...


you see... Venus under a dense cloud cover was not known to be rotating on it's axis opposite what the Earth rotates in the 24 hour period we know as a day.

Venus in fact spins to the West at the fantastically slow rate of 1 venusian 'Day' equalling 243 Earth days
...

now, since the ancients, did not have modern astronomy devices or space probes to know the planet spins backwards from every other planet in the solar system...
just how did our ancestors from ~10,000 years ago, at the start of religions...
know to give that 'Morning Star' its designation of 'Lucifer'...a Lucifer that goes counter to God...just as the planet Venus is rotating counter to the solar systems cosmic harmony...

did the ancients have special knowledge passed to them... which became Myth as a way for the human collective memory to embrace these 'facts' which were beyond any historical technology available


your guess is as good as mine...



the opposite 'Day' rotation of Morning Star/Lucifer could not have been seen before telescopes were invented,
even if the dense cloud cover of Morning Star/Lucifer (Venus) was not yet obscuring the surface before 10,000 years ago
So early men, in developing their religions, were purely lucky in selecting Venus to be the Luciferian body in the Solar System... the only celestial body in our inner system to rotate opposite the others

Lucky or inspired?
or just a fluke ?
edit on 20-2-2012 by St Udio because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-2-2012 @ 12:37 PM by Afterthought
reply to post by BeastMaster2012



Excellent thread!
I never knew that about Venus and its cyclical movement.

I have been aware for some time about the elite's obsession with Venus.
You may find this article from The Vigilant Citizen interesting:
vigilantcitizen.com...
In the following scene, we see the result of this simulated gang bang: A pregnant Anna posing in a way similar to the classic painting “Birth of Venus”. We then see a countdown from the year 2012 to the year zero, which is associated with the birth year of Jesus Christ.



reply posted on 20-2-2012 @ 12:43 PM by blocula
Originally posted by St Udio
reply to
post by blocula



...Plato,born in 428 bc,pre-dates the New Testament and some of the re-writes of the Old Testament and he wrote in his work called Timaeus...

"First,there was the Moon in the orbit nearest the Earth and next the Sun,in the second orbit above the Earth. Then came the "morning star" and the star sacred to Hermes,moving in orbits which have an equal swiftness with the Sun,but in an opposite direction ...





was Plato correct. that 'Hermes' and 'Morning Star' moved in opposite directions...

on the face of it, it seems Plato is in error in his observation, because both 'Hermes'=mercury
and 'Morning Star'=venus orbit the Sun in the same direction, as with all of the inner rocky planets


but here's the weird thing... was Plato referring to the orbit direction of Morning Star (venus)
or was he being occultist, cryptic in stating that the Morning Star (venus) rotated in an opposite direction?



RE: cseligman.com...

Venus in fact spins to the West at the fantastically slow rate of 1 venusian 'Day' equalling 243 Earth days

I think that the rogue comet venus has such a slow rotation because its original rotation speed was slowed down a little by the earths gravity as it closely and relatively slowly swept passed and was then captured by the suns gravity,which slowed the rotation of venus even further to aquire its present day rotational rate of 243 earth days...
edit on 20-2-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 20-2-2012 @ 02:45 PM by blocula
reply to post by BeastMaster2012

Its quite possible that most or even all asteroids were once actually comets that have burned off their outer layers and this burning off we see in the night sky as their tails...

Ancient accounts and records from all over the world of massive "fiery dragons with burning tails in the sky" are quite numerous...

According to the information in this and other links,pluto,with a diameter of 1,423 miles,might have once been a comet and theres even a comet thats larger than jupiter > wiki.answers.com...

So could venus,with a diameter of 7,520 miles,have once been a "rogue comet?...Yes...

Earths diameter is 7,926 miles...

Jupiters diameter is 88,846 miles...

Ceres,the largest known asteroid has a diameter of 590 miles...

The distinction between "asteroids" and "comets" has now started to blur seriously...When Do Asteroids And Comets Become One And The Same? > www.spacedaily.com...
edit on 20-2-2012 by blocula because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  9    10    11    12  >>    ^^TOP^^



New Testament Fairy Tales
  Posted 7 days ago with 25 member flags
A Brief Rant On Religion
  Posted 2 days ago with 24 member flags
Obama has declared himself the messiah?
  Posted 3 days ago with 13 member flags