It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
1) I have shown with links, sources and evidence, along with other posters, that Nazism is a religion. Therefore it equals any other religion, especially violent ones.
2)I did not vilify Islam , it vilified itself before I was even born.
And I only took those quotes to contradict what the other poster said about Islam being Peaceful all the time. Just to show there is 2 sides of that coin.
And you cannot interpret "killing" in any other way it is killing. Either they IGNORE the passage, or they follow it and kill people.
3) I never said Christianity was different. I said they just IGNORE Leviticus purposefully with all kinds of silly excuses. Does Islam ignore those sections?
Because I have video tape of so called Islamic people preaching those quotes. Show me some videos of Christians PREACHING LEVITICUS. Good luck on that one. Specifically find this one, people preaching that "if your kids talk back, kill them" which is in Leviticus.
I was not cherry picking your posts. I skipped over your Bible quotes because I ALREADY ADDRESSED THEM. I equated Leviticus with the Islamic Equivalent.
Using this whole "your a cherry picker" is one of the worst forms of debate I've seen today...[edit on 7-5-2010 by muzzleflash]
Originally posted by silencer
When people draw cartoons of Mohammad knowing it will upset even the 'Moderate Muslims', they do it anyway. Majority of people support it too. Yet, the same people are opposed to building a mosque because it will upset people. Double Standards
The Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy began after 12 editorial cartoons, most of which depicted the Islamic prophet Muhammad, were published in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten on 30 September 2005.
This led to protests across the Muslim world, some of which escalated into violence with police firing on the crowds (resulting in a total of more than 100 deaths),[1] including setting fire to the Danish Embassies in Syria, Lebanon and Iran, storming European buildings, and desecrating the Danish, Dutch, Norwegian, French and German flags in Gaza City.[2][3] Various groups, primarily in the Western world, responded by endorsing the Danish policies, including "Buy Danish" campaigns and other displays of support. Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen described the controversy as Denmark's worst international crisis since World War II
Supporters have said that the cartoons illustrated an important issue in a period of Islamic terrorism and that their publication is a legitimate exercise of the right of free speech, explicitly tied to the issue of self-censorship.They claim that Muslims were not targeted in a discriminatory way since unflattering cartoons about other religions (or their leaders) are frequently printed.
...and whether the images of Muhammad per se are offensive to Muslims, as thousands of illustrations of Muhammad have appeared in books by and for Muslims[7]
Amir Taheri on whether or not portraying the Prophet Muhammad is banned:
"There are lots of images of the Prophet Muhammad - we are talking in London [the discussion was recorded in London] and we could take Mr Ramadan to the Victoria and Albert Museum, to the British Library and to many other places where there are hundreds of images of the Prophet Muhammad in books written and illustrated by Muslims and there are many thousands more in museums and libraries in Muslim countries."
Originally posted by nixie_nox
So if the terrorists happened to be Christian, does that mean people can get mad about building churches in NYC?
Originally posted by muzzleflash
This looks way worse than Double Standards to me.
1) So you can criticize Jesus or Krishna or Buddha or Moses, but if someone criticizes Mohammad, death threats fly and people start dying??
2)Muslim texts depict Mohammad and it is ok, but when a "infidel" does it, he deserves to die?
Thank you for bringing up the cartoon subject as it illustrates the type of mentality going on here.
How many New Yorkers are going to send in death threats and start rioting/murdering Muslims over their mosque near 'ground zero"?? None? Figures...
Originally posted by Frakkerface
reply to post by Wondering302
Heading for a muslim country? what does that even mean?? Please explain, I'd love to know. Have you even been to a muslim country? You might be pleasantly surprised.
I could understand some fuss about a mosque if 911 was carried out by muslims but seeing as there is no proof of that I don't see the big deal.
This New York, there must be a lot of muslims in such metropolitan city. Hardly surprising a mosque is getting built. How long is USA going to hang on to the fallacy of 911 and the stigma of Islam?
Originally posted by AndersonLee
Plans to build a mosque two blocks away from ground zero
2 blocks is not near ...2 blocks away is a long ways
[edit on 7-5-2010 by AndersonLee]
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
I'm sorry but anyone who defends the Westboro Church is just as vile and repulsive as the members of that group. A bunch of ill minded creatures they are. I don't care where Fred was and what he did for who, protesting funerals of soldiers and bashing homosexuality only shows your true side: Depraved and Uncivilized.
Sorry, had to get that out there
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
reply to post by muzzleflash
They are indeed a bunch of lunatics, Also, it's hard not to be one sided when it comes to them. How can anyone sympathize with them? I wouldn't be surprised if they preached murder either TBH.