WASHINGTON – A bipartisan Senate coalition has rejected a proposal to limit the size of the nation's largest banks as a means of reining in the
financial sector. The Senate voted 61-33 against a proposal that would have required the nation's giant banks to split up. The Obama administration
has argued that the size of financial institutions was not the root cause of the 2008 Wall Street crisis. The proposal by Democratic Sens. Sherrod
Brown of Ohio and Ted Kaufman of Delaware was staunchly opposed by the bank industry. Brown and Kaufman argued that cutting banks down to size would
end firms deemed "too big to fail." Among the banks that would have been affected were Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and
Morgan Stanley.
news.yahoo.com...
Corrupt bastards!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The top 6 banks own 63.6 percent of our GDP!!!!!!!!!!
And that's not the frickin problem????
Yeah, let's continue to NOT enforce ANTI-TRUST LAWS!!!! Looks like the banks are still TOO BIG TOO FAIL.
The middle class however....they don't give a damn if we fail or not.
Could this explain the plunge stocks took today? A pre-emptive strike if the politicians didn't do what the bankers wanted them too?
Bernie Sanders changed his audit the Fed bill today as well and made it weaker which made the Fed happy.
The banks are winning.
[edit on 6-5-2010 by David9176]